@klyph,
klyph;45987 wrote:Our current president recieved fewer total votes than another candidate, yet still used his power and influence to skew the vote in his favor. Does that sound like free election to you?
Not my words, people who follow the government without questioning it are sheep. As long as you question every decision/policy they enforce upon you before accepting it, you are not a sheep.
It's not those who are anarchist that I'm talking about, it's those that seek to limit govt. authority and keep vital checks and balances in place. Smaller govt. is always better govt.
Do you fail to see the point that elected officials lie while campaigning without any accountability? Do you fail to see elected officials catering to special interest group lobbyists with millions of dollars to push their legislation? I'm not saying that all elected officials are like that, but to say that the majority are representing the working class is ridiculous.
Because it lets terrorists win. They don't care if their plots are thwarted over and over, what they're trying to do is "terrorize" you. To change your life so that you live in constant fear of their attacks. Giving up your civil liberties means that they have succeeded and you are so afraid of them that your level of freedom is decreased.
I have been here so much longer than you, and I STILL cant get that ******* multi quote post to work.
As a popular vote fan, I also understand that we implemented with our popular vote the Electoral College. More population in a state = more electoral votes. The popular vote can NOt be lookin at over all, it has to be broken down state by state, in this case Bush in BOTH hsi elections won the nessesary states to recieve more electoral votes.
I would not be against the idea of doing away with the electoral college, and going to straight popular vote, granted we wont elect a president november, it will be march, but thats okay.
What I think is more realistic to extend the electoral college by district. The district lines are already mapped out, for the lesser elections, (house of representatives) and based on a mid term election time to vote in a representative, we would have our new president by January.
I understand questioning government actions, I dont understand questioning EVERY action. We put them in power as a delegation of certain responsibilities. so we wouldnt have to have a 250 million man vote every time we need the federal interest rate to go down a quarter percent.
Limiting government, and tieing their hands walk hand in hand. IF more people wanted to LIMIT the government, then less would get done than now. I truly believe our government works, and works the way it was intended. I have yet to see anything on scale worth getting ancy about or even blinking at, happen that should cause any other opinion.
Those elected official can in fact lie, AKA not support there electing constituency thats why they are not LIFE TIME posts, that is why we have elections every 2 and 4 years. Case in point. George Bush (the first one) won his campaign based off of "READ MY LIPS NO NEW TAXES" and infact created more taxes than any other president (1 or 2 term) in history. What happened? second term comes around the people spoke, and Slick willy took office. YAY for free elections.
I guess I am one of those that do not feel an injustice if I cant make a phone call without big brother listening. I would rather lose a few civil liberties and have 100 terrorist plots thwarted, than KEEP all my civil liberties, and have ONE terrorist plot succeed.