Op-Ed Obama and the 'They' Sayers

Obama is one of "they" (the Harvard educated political aristocracy), but at least he's not white. :p

like that? that was the first thing I thought when he broke news, he wants us to help Africa, sh-t start with the homeless on our streets first please. Every western world country is helping Africa always have. They need to stay in their country and build from the bottom up. When their people get an education from a western world country they should have to go back home and contibute.

So you lied yet again? "I'm retired, if its any of your business."I prefer not to know you but you seem insistent on gloating about yourself. I listened to some of your music but i'll refrain from giving my opinion on it. Unless of course you think you can take it? If i run across any poetry i'll read it as well. But i'll not pay for it.Trying to stay out of prison, you?
You first, so what were you in for?
I don't know, what your opinion of this post, LOL.

So the token black man has a real shot of shaking up the otherwise 100% white political aristocracy. Sounds like a good reason to vote for him if you ask me.

less than dog poo poo. which is more than my opinion of you.
Would that be considered "an attack"????

Hush, truth....perhaps we'll get the integrity that we've been missing for the past 6 yrs. Oh, before you go there....Clinton was a Ho'....but he was the smartest, and one of the best Presidents outside of FDR, JFK, and Reagan (yes, I said Reagan....surprised? At least, he was semi-honest.)
The Bushes are among the worst, in history. Conventional wisdom

he was semi-honest

LOL, i can prove Clinton lied, can you prove Bush did? I'll be waiting.

So the token black man has a real shot of shaking up the otherwise 100% white political aristocracy. Sounds like a good reason to vote for him if you ask me.

If Bush didn't lie...why are so many calling for his and Cheney's heads? Over 70% of the populace think that the Iraqi war was a mistake...they can't be all liberals or Democrats...Congress is investigating Bush's and Cheney's lies...but they have to be and are being methodical...however Bush is citing executive privilege, to block any investigation of possible wrongdoing. Why? Because he's as guilty as sin...and would serve jail time, if pursued to its' logical end.
And we don't need for you to prove Clinton lied...because he lied, he was impeached...although it didn't go the nine yards, and he was allowed to serve out his term. He lied about sex....Bush lied about reasons to go to war...people have died...last time I checked, no one died from Clinton's lying about his affair.
As Bill Moyers said in his speech in January concerning the media and its' losing ground from being "free press"....the administration is talking about a surge, in Iraq (in terms of military strength and offensives), as though it were an electrical current, increasing the output, instead of the spurting of blood from some troop member's arm.
This administration used the press to promote its mindset to have this war, at all costs...and used slogans to demean and dismantle its' critics, and to bumper sticker the war for the masses....lie upon lie....
Perhaps, in the war against terrorism, you want your fundamental freedoms infringed upon...but I don't...and neither do millions of other Americans...
I'd sooner see them strike us again...and again...perhaps, then, some of you might be "bombed" into common sense...I said it, and I'm here to represent it...A government that doesn't serve me as a citizen, isn't my government...and you can take that to any bank, and cash that check. The Constitution insures the funds.

GW wanted the prick's head on a plate for personal reasons. So, yeah.....there was probably a wee bit of fibbing before the attack. Nonetheless, Saddam was begging for it, and would have taken it in the shorts eventually, anyway.

If Bush didn't lie...why are so many calling for his and Cheney's heads?

Over 70% of the populace think that the Iraqi war was a mistake...they can't be all liberals or Democrats...Congress is investigating Bush's and Cheney's lies...but they have to be and are being methodical...however Bush is citing executive privilege, to block any investigation of possible wrongdoing. Why?

So what your saying is you don't need proof. Your willing to convict him without due process, strange you were complaining about it happening to others but yet your willing to commit it on him?Because he can.

What's this integrity bullshit? We're talking about the Clintons.

Maybe. I kind of like him, anyway. But, I'm Republican.:headbang:

GW wanted the prick's head on a plate for personal reasons. So, yeah.....there was probably a wee bit of fibbing before the attack. Nonetheless, Saddam was begging for it, and would have taken it in the shorts eventually, anyway.

"a bit of fibbing" :eek: now that is a new way of putting it :wtf: