make up imaginary history of the jews? i have mild bouts of :rollinglaugh:CHRONIC:rollinglaugh:
memory loss.. so show me where i did this..
If so, then you will know that it's God's will to bring back the Jews to Israel. You will also know that Ishmael and his descendants didn't create Israel, God did through Jacob. So it's the land of the Jews as much as the land of the descendants of Ishmael. But then you also said you don't believe anything the Jews say, which would include the bible. So either your memory is extremely short or you've told so many lies you can't remember them all.
Monkies don't turn into people you muppet. Nor is stated in [SIZE="7"]ANY[/SIZE] Scientific text that they do.
To make such another incompetent statement like the one about archeology ensures that everyone on this site knows of your ignorance. Well done :thumbup:
Wrong. The Darwin Delusion claims that monkeys apes, or better yet, imaginary animals (since they don't know who the common ancestors are) "evolved" into humans which means they turned into humans. :rollinglaugh: That's what "evolution" means, something inferior turning into something superior. So I agree, humans didn't come from any animal. They were created by God.
[SIZE="7"]FAIL!!![/SIZE]
It states that we have a [SIZE="7"]Common[/SIZE]Ancestor.
Once again you show your incompetence and ignorance.
Edit: I like the way you called it the Darwin Dellusion. You must have read the God Dellusion by Richard Dawkins, if not i highly recommnd it.
The following is how he wrote it:
Common to whom? :eek: No one knows since Darwin couldn't describe them. So the common ancestor is a figment of the imaginations of men.
The Darwin Delusion
When writing a story, an author has to make up his characters before he can go on with his story. Since Darwin had no evidence of his characters in the real world, he had to conjure them up in his imagination. He simply looked for an alternative to the biblical account of the creation of man and said; "If man wasn't created by God, then where could he have come from? I know, something that already exists like...another animal. Hey, yeah...which animal looks like a human? An ape!":rollinglaugh:
So here's how the story of evolution began:
Once upon a time 500,000 years ago... no 750,000 years ago... no 2,000,000 years ago...I'll skip the setting and go on.
Once upon a long time ago, an ape,..no a monkey, no a half-human- half monkey...I'll skip that part too and just call him an ancestor common to...humans...no monkeys..no humans and monkeys...no, humans and some other unknown animal.
Once upon a long time ago a common ancestor, no many common ancestors, yeah, I'll stick with that...mated with a monkey..no an ape...
Needless to say, a story that didn't start well can't end well either. Nevertheless, because people were eagerly looking for an alternate explanation to God's creation, it wouldn't be hard at all for them to accept even a badly written fiction story that never got started.
Since Darwin never described his main characters, then he can't possibly know what they were capable of breeding. But again, since the public wanted even a badly written story, then Darwin left it to the imaginations of his readers to finish the story. :eek: But as expected, one can't finish a story that never even began which is why of course, no one today still knows the main characters (common ancestors) of Darwin's story.
But what makes his story a delusion, is that Darwin actually believed that his characters existed! :rollinglaugh:It's bad enough when an author believes that characters he can describe existed, but when he believes that characters that he himself can't describe existed, then his story is even more delusional. :rollinglaugh:
When God says that the wisdom of the world is foolishness in His sight, nothing proves Him right better than the story of evolution.
Nice Copy and Paste. Used that before have you?
Back up the claims now then please.
It can be backed up by the fact that people today still don't know who the common ancestors were, where they lived, what they looked like, what language the first speaking humans spoke, nor have there been any accounts of people in history of creatures like Neanderthas. So the story of evolution is a fairy tale, and a badly written one as well since Darwin could even describe his main characters. :rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: And a bad fiction story can't make a good true story. But a badly written fiction story is all scientists have to try to deny God. So they'll hang on to the Darwin delusions for some time to come.
Yup many times.
Wrong. The Darwin Delusion claims that monkeys apes, or better yet, imaginary animals (since they don't know who the common ancestors are) "evolved" into humans which means they turned into humans. :rollinglaugh: That's what "evolution" means, something inferior turning into something superior. So I agree, humans didn't come from any animal. They were created by God.
"MISSING LINK" FOUND: New Fossil Links Humans, Lemurs?
Here's one. took me about 30 secs to find. This is a common ancestor.
They thus can claim that the links in the chain are any fossil they want them to be. And people who can't think for themselves, buy it hook, line, and sinker because you worship scientists as infallible gods. :rollinglaugh:
:rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: I've seen the new "missing link" and it looks more like a tiny lizard than it does a human being. :rollinglaugh:
But again, since Darwin never described his main characters (the common ancestors), then they only have one end of the chain and that's "modern-day" humans.
Darwin did not know what the LUCA (last universal common ancestor) was, modern scientists believe it is a primitive form of eukaryote.
That's again, why no one knows who they are because they're the figments of the imagination of Darwin and not even he knew who they were!
Darwin didn't know anything because his claims all came from his imagination. Again, he left it to his readers to keep embellishing on his story because he didn't even know his characters! :rollinglaugh: So there are as many ideas of who the common ancestors were as there are imaginations who conjure them up.
Have you read the Origin of the Species?
Yes. And it's as voluminous both in range and scope of the imagination as "Lord Of The Rings." :rollinglaugh: Tolken came from the premise "What if little people actually existed and wanted to search for a ring?" Then he made sure that he dotted every i and crossed every t to make his story sound believable and consistent within his premise as all fiction writers do.
And that's what Darwin did in the "Origin of the Species." His premise was; "What if humans came from....?" So, Darwin didn't even have a complete premise! :rollinglaugh: So the story can't go anywhere until he can describe his main characters.
At least Tolken knew that his characters came from his imagination. Darwin couldn't even describe the characters that came from his imagination any more than he could describe the setting.:rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: Tolken also never believed his characters were real. Darwin did, even though he had no clue who they were. :eek:
So there's nothing more delusional than the story of evolution.
Then clearly you didn't understand it.
