1
   

Iran could strike the US by 2015

 
 
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 04:41 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;41854 wrote:
I love how you word that. So... neocon-ish.

Abandon the jews? Naah. Stop support for Israel? I think we need to consider it. Not to "appease the terrorists", as you put it, but to let them fight their own fight. Israel hasn't exactly been the follower of non-violence. They *were* the first to break the non-aggression pact with Hamas.

If they want the Temple Mount so badly, let them get it themselves.

No they are the only country of the western influence to know to win one has to be as violent as the enemy. And they hold their own I would say greatly.
Brian764
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 06:54 pm
@Silverchild79,



Another propaganda to justify attacking another Country.
0 Replies
 
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 09:22 pm
@Freeman15,
Got me both ways....loool Maybe I am the fool. :dunno: following Freeman15 post othe rpage.
This just in.
Iraq drawdown to begin in volatile area
AP - 4 minutes ago WASHINGTON - Commanders in Iraq have decided to begin the drawdown of U.S. forces in volatile Diyala province, marking a turning point in the U.S. military mission, The Associated Press has learned.
The top news headlines on current events from Yahoo! News
0 Replies
 
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 09:24 pm
@Freeman15,
Got me both ways....loool Maybe I am the fool. :dunno: Folling Freeman15 post earlier page.........
This just in.
Iraq drawdown to begin in volatile area
AP - 4 minutes ago WASHINGTON - Commanders in Iraq have decided to begin the drawdown of U.S. forces in volatile Diyala province, marking a turning point in the U.S. military mission, The Associated Press has learned.
The top news headlines on current events from Yahoo! News
0 Replies
 
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 10:17 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;41999 wrote:
No matter how you play with the words, it means the same thing, abandon the Jews. Israel was the first to break the non-aggression pact with Hamas?
Hamas has NEVER recognized Israels right to exist, Hamas continues to broadcast from their radio and T.V. stations the need for the Jews to leave. And calling for the destruction of Israel. Hamas is not intrested in any peace as long as the Jews remain in the land of Israel. Hamas continues to talk out of both sides of their mouth, words of peace for us here in the West, and words of war when speaking with their own people.


Israel produces nothing of value for the US and are a strategic liability to us. They have a technologically advanced army, nuclear weapons, and money. They can defend themselves.

Here's a fun thought. If God intended the Jews to inherit the land that is Israel, why not let the Arabs and Jews fight it out and see who wins? If the Israelis are truly granted the land by spiritual decree, surely God will intervene on their behalf if they begin to lose.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 10:18 pm
@mlurp,
mlurp;42001 wrote:
No they are the only country of the western influence to know to win one has to be as violent as the enemy. And they hold their own I would say greatly.


So they're good fighters, awesome, no reason for us to supply and support them then.
0 Replies
 
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Oct, 2007 11:54 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;42055 wrote:
Here's a fun thought. If God intended the Jews to inherit the land that is Israel, why not let the Arabs and Jews fight it out and see who wins? If the Israelis are truly granted the land by spiritual decree, surely God will intervene on their behalf if they begin to lose.


Absolutely fabulous idea.
0 Replies
 
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 01:10 am
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;42055 wrote:
Israel produces nothing of value for the US and are a strategic liability to us. They have a technologically advanced army, nuclear weapons, and money. They can defend themselves.

Here's a fun thought. If God intended the Jews to inherit the land that is Israel, why not let the Arabs and Jews fight it out and see who wins? If the Israelis are truly granted the land by spiritual decree, surely God will intervene on their behalf if they begin to lose.


Now I'm going to tell you what is going to happen. The Islamic nations will align themselves with Russia. Down the road Russia is going to start putting pressure on the U.S. to drop support for Israel. For a period of two years Islamic nations with Russia will be talking about war with the U.S. America will finally back away from Israel, and leave the way clear for the Islamic nations to march on her. I don't see this happening for another 20 years or so, but it will happen.
According the the Scriptures, when Russia and all of the Islamic nations move on Israel God steps in and destroys five sixths of their army. At first Russia does not see this as Gods intervention and believes it is an American trick. Without warning Russia then launches a full nuclear strike at America. According to the Bible, American cities will burn and our nation comes to her end in one hours time. Also the Bible tells us America will refuse to fight and surrenders. Then Europe suddenly becomes the leader of the western world because America no longer exist as a nation. The leader of Europe at first really brings the world together, and for a short time things look like there going to be ok. But the worst is yet to come.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 02:18 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;42065 wrote:
Now I'm going to tell you what is going to happen. The Islamic nations will align themselves with Russia. Down the road Russia is going to start putting pressure on the U.S. to drop support for Israel. For a period of two years Islamic nations with Russia will be talking about war with the U.S. America will finally back away from Israel, and leave the way clear for the Islamic nations to march on her. I don't see this happening for another 20 years or so, but it will happen.
According the the Scriptures, when Russia and all of the Islamic nations move on Israel God steps in and destroys five sixths of their army. At first Russia does not see this as Gods intervention and believes it is an American trick. Without warning Russia then launches a full nuclear strike at America. According to the Bible, American cities will burn and our nation comes to her end in one hours time. Also the Bible tells us America will refuse to fight and surrenders. Then Europe suddenly becomes the leader of the western world because America no longer exist as a nation. The leader of Europe at first really brings the world together, and for a short time things look like there going to be ok. But the worst is yet to come.


:beat:

Please, show us the words America, Russia, nuclear, or Europe in the bible. Take you time.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 04:12 am
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;42066 wrote:
:beat:

Please, show us the words America, Russia, nuclear, or Europe in the bible. Take you time.


The Bible does not often give names. Jesus Christ fulfilled three hundred prophecies of the Old Testament, yet no where will you find the name Jesus Christ in the Old Testament. The Bible describes America, and the result of a nuclear attack on it. There is no less than 14 descriptions to isolate America and there really are more than 14. Yet there is only one nation on earth that fits all 14. Russia is pointed out by ancient tribal names, and also God states that Israel enemy would come from her uttermost north.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 05:26 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;41999 wrote:
Israel was the first to break the non-aggression pact with Hamas?


"On 19 August 2006 Israel launched a raid in Lebanon's eastern Beqaa Valley it says was aimed to disrupt weapons supplies to Hezbollah from Syria and Iran.[142] Lebanese officials "said the Israelis were apparently seeking a guerrilla target in a school."[143] Reports indicate that the Israeli commandos were disguised in Lebanese Army uniforms (thus masquerading as a non-combatant party) and spoke Arabic in an attempt to pass themselves off as Arabs.[144][145][146] One Israeli soldier was killed, another mortally wounded, while 3 Hezbollah fighters were wounded. Hezbollah said it wouldn't respond to the attack. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply concerned" about an Israeli commando raid in eastern Lebanon Saturday, calling it a violation of a U.N.-backed ceasefire. The statement also cites UNIFIL troops as saying there have "also been several air violations by Israeli military aircraft."[147] Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev told the Associated Press that “[t]he cease-fire is based on (U.N. resolution) 1701 which calls for an international arms embargo against Hezbollah.”[142] Regev was referring to article 8 of the resolution which calls for an end to all weapons transfers to Hezbollah."

EDIT: Taken from the 'pedia. There were incidents previous to that which did not cross the borders, i.e. weapons fired inside the respective countries. This is where Israel crossed over and took matters into their own hands.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 05:44 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;41999 wrote:
No matter how you play with the words, it means the same thing, abandon the Jews.

Hamas has NEVER recognized Israels right to exist, Hamas continues to broadcast from their radio and T.V. stations the need for the Jews to leave. And calling for the destruction of Israel. Hamas is not intrested in any peace as long as the Jews remain in the land of Israel. Hamas continues to talk out of both sides of their mouth, words of peace for us here in the West, and words of war when speaking with their own people.


You don't want to "abandon the Jews" because your book says so.

Like I said, this is all because "the Jews" can't bring their messiah back because the Dome of the Rock sits on the site where they need to build their temple. This has been going on long before we were around.

You think "the terrorists" are out for us now? Just wait until Israel decides to take that structure out. You'll get your biblical prophecies fulfilled alright.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 08:48 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;42070 wrote:
The Bible does not often give names. Jesus Christ fulfilled three hundred prophecies of the Old Testament, yet no where will you find the name Jesus Christ in the Old Testament. The Bible describes America, and the result of a nuclear attack on it. There is no less than 14 descriptions to isolate America and there really are more than 14. Yet there is only one nation on earth that fits all 14. Russia is pointed out by ancient tribal names, and also God states that Israel enemy would come from her uttermost north.


http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/anim_lol.gif http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/anim_rofl2.gif http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/abovelol.gif

So, aside from someones interpretation there is no mention of the United States, Europe, Russia, or nuclear? Didn't tihnk so. Sorry, not falling for the fearmongering.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 12:38 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;42070 wrote:
The Bible does not often give names. Jesus Christ fulfilled three hundred prophecies of the Old Testament, yet no where will you find the name Jesus Christ in the Old Testament. The Bible describes America, and the result of a nuclear attack on it. There is no less than 14 descriptions to isolate America and there really are more than 14. Yet there is only one nation on earth that fits all 14. Russia is pointed out by ancient tribal names, and also God states that Israel enemy would come from her uttermost north.


So you want to base foreign policy on a storybook? They already tried that, they called it a "crusade", in fact they tried it three times before figuring out it wouldn't work.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 01:25 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;42083 wrote:
http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/anim_lol.gif http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/anim_rofl2.gif http://glocktalk.com/images/smilies/abovelol.gif

So, aside from someones interpretation there is no mention of the United States, Europe, Russia, or nuclear? Didn't tihnk so. Sorry, not falling for the fearmongering.


You really need to take some time out of your life and consider these prophecies. If someone had just written in names you would of said that nation just used those names to fit themselves into the prophecy. Putting a description of places, nations, and events is far more convincing and would be impossible to duplicate unless true. The fact is the Jews are back in Israel as stated, they took Jerusalem by force as stated, Jerusalems East Gate survived and is buried and now has become the foundation of the Porch Gate and that Porch Gate is sealed, and all attempts to break through have failed as the Bible predicted they would. Why to much going on here to ignore, only the slow of mind would put these facts behind them. It's not a question of falling for anything, it's a question of actually useing your mind to think with and consider.
0 Replies
 
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 01:35 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;42107 wrote:
So you want to base foreign policy on a storybook? They already tried that, they called it a "crusade", in fact they tried it three times before figuring out it wouldn't work.


If the crusaders had actually read their bible, they would of understood it was Jews who would control Jerusalem not crusaders. Also, the crusades was a responce to the Moslems putting Christians to death because they would not convert to Islam. According to the Bible the Jews in the latter days would first take South Israel first, then they would take Jerusalem second. Also at the time of this even the nations of the east would would be able to field an army of 200 million men. I'm not even sure during the crusades if that part of the world even had 200 million men, let alone an army that size. It was not until 1960 when China first announced, and useing that very same number, stated that they now could field an army of 200 million men.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 04:55 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;42117 wrote:
If the crusaders had actually read their bible, they would of understood it was Jews who would control Jerusalem not crusaders. Also, the crusades was a responce to the Moslems putting Christians to death because they would not convert to Islam. According to the Bible the Jews in the latter days would first take South Israel first, then they would take Jerusalem second. Also at the time of this even the nations of the east would would be able to field an army of 200 million men. I'm not even sure during the crusades if that part of the world even had 200 million men, let alone an army that size. It was not until 1960 when China first announced, and useing that very same number, stated that they now could field an army of 200 million men.


Actually, the second and third crusades were both launched against the Muslims during a time in which Islam and Christianity shared Jersusalem and other holy sites.

You scare me. You can't base foreign policy on a book only 1/6 of the world deem significant, especially considering "enemies" of the US subscribe to a book that another 1/6 of the global population. It just doesn't mesh.
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 05:16 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;42055 wrote:
Israel produces nothing of value for the US and are a strategic liability to us. They have a technologically advanced army, nuclear weapons, and money. They can defend themselves.

Here's a fun thought. If God intended the Jews to inherit the land that is Israel, why not let the Arabs and Jews fight it out and see who wins? If the Israelis are truly granted the land by spiritual decree, surely God will intervene on their behalf if they begin to lose.
Israel Information, Income Tax Israel, Agriculture Israel, Israel Import, Israel Export & Israel Employment Information
A simple google serch would have avoided this.
Brian764
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 05:19 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;42128 wrote:
Actually, the second and third crusades were both launched against the Muslims during a time in which Islam and Christianity shared Jersusalem and other holy sites.
QUOTE]

This is a bit off the topic but I thought I would interject here, so forgive me.

Those who use violence to achieve there goal under the banner of Christianity, are not Christians. True Christians, abhor violence; they live by Jesus' words, who said that those who live by the sword will die by the sword. True Christians do not seek to impose what they believe on others, but they preach the gospel/good news of the kingdom of God, and baptize those who believe.

It is hard for non believers to know who true Christians are, but here is one way. The Bible says, "by there fruit you will know them." In other words, if they are involved in or support violence in any form, or support those who do, then they are not true Christian. But if they love and do good to those who hate them, and those who hurt, and kill them, then they are the ones who are truly Christians.
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2007 05:28 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;40744 wrote:
Russia left Afghanistan, and they don't suffer from Afghani terrorism. The Chechens are the only real terrorist group in Russia, and they want independence, can't really negotiate with them. The wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam PROVE my point that enemies don't "follow you home" when you stop occupying their land, they go about their business. In fact, I cannot think of a single historical reference where an occupying army left a region, only to suffer serious violent blowback.

Again my friend Freeman15 you miss the point I am trying to make. And you go back if you care and re-read my post. Seing part of the picture isn't seeing anything if the whole is more dangerous than the part. But each is entitled to their own ideas.
And by the way I do hope I am wrong about Iran and Bush attacking. I really am hoping I am wrong.In fact praying he doesn't.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/08/2025 at 10:37:39