@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;40359 wrote:congressional approval isn't required for a one time air/missile strike, or a 60 day ground campaign for that matter
never has been
Regan never needed approval for Grenada, etc
and contrary to cynical belief we don't need to blame Iran for anything, they've already contributed to more US deaths then Germany ever did before we declared war on them. The Ron Pualer's always ask me for proof, well if you're going to accuse the US of planting evidence on Iran I would like to see some proof because the fact of the matter is that isn't what's happening. Had the US been interested in planting proof the whole "why haven't we found WMD in Iraq" debate would have never happened
Wrong again.
Iranians haven't killed Americans in Iraq, their weapons have. Using your logic, Germany was just in declaring war on the US because we were supplying aircraft to the British during the Battle of Britain. It's botched logic.
We don't accuse anybody of planting evidence, we just want to see something more than a handful of Revolutionary Guardsmen caught inside Iraq. We have spec ops advising paramilitary groups and governments globally, so what makes us special? WHY are you so hell bent on attacking Iran? Do you not know what this would entail? We will eliminate ANY semblance of support for the US abroad, I doubt even the UK will join us, and you bet your ass the Chinese and Russians will veto any Security Council resolution sanctioning military force, so we'll have to rely on NATO. Germany and France won't help us, and outside of Britain, they're the only NATO members with a military capable of legitimately assisting.
Further, what makes you think we can win? Say we invade Iran, and ANOTHER Iraq happens. Or better yet, we bomb Iran, and they increase supply to the insurgency, or perhaps INVADE Iraq. No doubt we would repel such an invasion conventionally, but they'd likely do the guerilla thing, mostly because it works.
Then of course you have the global price of crude oil spiking at over $100/barrel in the event of Iranian production losses, effectively killing what's left of our tattered economy.
You, along with other neocon hawks have not thought this little project through. You're using the same thought-process that got us into this god awful mess in Iraq AND you've got no evidence that:
1. Iran is seeking nuclear weapons.
2. Iran would seek to use nuclear weapons on the US.
3. Iran would GIVE billion-dollar equipment to terrorists (you'll notice Hezbollah doesn't have APC's or choppers).
If you're Iran, even a nuclear Iran, why would you attack a nation with THOUSANDS of nuclear warheads? The USSR has more warheads than we did, and yet nuclear war never happened, why is that? Nations don't go to war unless they think they can win, this is BASIC realpolitique thinking. Iran is NO THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES NOR WILL IT BE SOON.
Edit:
Declaration of War is needed for all military excursions. War Powers Act is unconstitutional in this respect, but it is impossible to challege in court because no tort can be proven by anybody with the ability to contest the law. READ YOUR CONSTITUTION.