Victory in Iraq, the Iran connection, and only the facts

@Silverchild79,

Listening to GW today on TV, I felt proud. The old guy made me proud. He denounced Al Qaeda, and spoke of the great need for the UK to hang tough with America in fighting it to the death. If I were Bush, I would have used much stronger language, but I know and understand he's trying to save the Republican Party. Nonetheless, Bush is a warrior, and won't betray his nation, its people, and their defense, in the face of a savage enemy. Good on ya, Dubya. Ya done good, Boy......real, real good now.

2 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Bush has already sold America to the House of Saud.

1 Reply

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;28478 wrote:

Listening to GW today on TV, I felt proud. The old guy made me proud. He denounced Al Qaeda, and spoke of the great need for the UK to hang tough with America in fighting it to the death. If I were Bush, I would have used much stronger language, but I know and understand he's trying to save the Republican Party. Nonetheless, Bush is a warrior, and won't betray his nation, its people, and their defense, in the face of a savage enemy. Good on ya, Dubya. Ya done good, Boy......real, real good now.

Impeachment hearing are not far off, now

2 Replies

@92b16vx,

92b16vx;28481 wrote:

Bush has already sold America to the House of Saud.

92b16vx,
Hush your mouth...that would make him a whore. .............Oh.

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;28483 wrote:

Impeachment hearing are not far off, now

He'll never be impeached, regardless of how much the liberals want to say "I got you back" it's not happening. The Iraq Intel stuff is past it's relevant prime and I wouldn't look for it to be brought back, even if Reid forced the issue he wouldn't get enough votes to pass it because it's to radical an alligation.

what's actually right around the corner is a budget war and the Dems will atempt to cut off funding for soldiers currently in Iraq (money used for food and bullets) in an effort to "support them".

1 Reply

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;28478 wrote:

Listening to GW today on TV, I felt proud. The old guy made me proud. He denounced Al Qaeda, and spoke of the great need for the UK to hang tough with America in fighting it to the death. If I were Bush, I would have used much stronger language, but I know and understand he's trying to save the Republican Party. Nonetheless, Bush is a warrior, and won't betray his nation, its people, and their defense, in the face of a savage enemy. Good on ya, Dubya. Ya done good, Boy......real, real good now.

oooh, wow...I'd bet that scared the bejesus out of Al-Qaeda, when he said that...and what has the fighting gotten the UK? Hmmm, let's see...several bombings in and around London...guess fighting the war, "over there", didn't do much for preventing it from coming to the UK...maybe if they fought "harder", or something...
maybe, getting the hell off their soil, might make them calm down...but we'll never know, because that option hasn't been tried yet...and the definition of insanity, is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results...the war ain't working.....and we're looking quite insane.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;28485 wrote:

He'll never be impeached, regardless of how much the liberals want to say "I got you back" it's not happening. The Iraq Intel stuff is past it's relevant prime and I wouldn't look for it to be brought back, even if Reid forced the issue he wouldn't get enough votes to pass it because it's to radical an alligation.

what's actually right around the corner is a budget war and the Dems will atempt to cut off funding for soldiers currently in Iraq (money used for food and bullets) in an effort to "support them".

Cam,
I was wondering where you had been hiding.
He will be impeached...along with Cheney (because I pray, every nite, that it be so)...we're waiting for the other shoes to fall...when Bush & Co, stonewall, against Miers and Rove, testifying before a congressional committee, the wheels of justice will speed up...and the likes of you will have your mouths
wide open in disbelief....oh, the writing is on the wall...mark my words. The day is coming.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

I've been terribly busy with work and the GF, summers are busy

I just don't see it, it's been two years since the initial headline and it still hasn't gotten off the ground. How long did Monica gate take to escalate? Weeks maybe?

2 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;28491 wrote:

I've been terribly busy with work and the GF, summers are busy

I just don't see it, it's been two years since the initial headline and it still hasn't gotten off the ground. How long did Monica gate take to escalate? Weeks maybe?

Oh, how telling! That's because Republicans and conservatives are "naturally rabid"....and although a whole slew of them were engaged the similar behavior and "worse", they couldn't wait to tear into Bill and try to bring him down....'cept it didn't work, did it? And now, he's more popular than ever...must hurt, terribly.

Well, the "crime" committed by Bill, "pales in comparison" to the litany of crimes (serious, in fact, and non sexual, in nature...although we can't rule that out, either) committed by Bush and Co....and no matter how many times you tell yourself that the reality is the other way around, won't change the fact that the covers are now off, and people can see the gross mess made, and there is no going back...the only way is forward, and that leads, invariably, to impeachment.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;28491 wrote:

I've been terribly busy with work and the GF, summers are busy

I just don't see it, it's been two years since the initial headline and it still hasn't gotten off the ground. How long did Monica gate take to escalate? Weeks maybe?

And I'd rather slow and sure, than fast and rash, any day of the week.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

well where's all the proof? you have something to share? The only thing I've heard thus far from the media is speculation with no hard evidence and questionable bases.

People say that Attacking Iraq violated UN regulations but under those same regulations Clinton's attack on Milosevic was illegal too. There's much spin requaire to prosecute bill and there's no DNA on any dress, just probably not gonna happen.

1 Reply

@Silverchild79,

you're free to believe as you will, as am I.
All the talk about Bill is moot...he is out of office and the whole affair is over and done with...But, Bush and Co. are in play...and that is what we're concerned with today...not the past, not what could have been, would have been, should have been. It's like you all cannot or refuse to take responsibility for what's happening now...you always have to drudge up Bill and his teeny, tinny faux pas (he perjured himself, behind a dalliance)..whereas, Bush and Co., lied about the reasons for going to war, in which, thousands of lives have been lost, and billions of dollars wasted...I fail to see the comparison.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

again, proof? links?

there isn't any, it's speculation

it's funny how the people who yell "Due Process" in protest to Gitmo throw due process out the window when the topic of impeeching Bush comes up

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

yeah, my prerogative, I guess...I'm just following suit...people on these boards say the most outlandish things, again, with no proof, or links, and it winds up being nothing more than opinion and propaganda...so, when in Rome....
"Due Process, in Gitmo"????? You mean the along with Abu-Gharib, the "stains" on our righteousness and standing on moral high ground? You didn't bring that up as a reference? You just didn't. Funny whom you think should have no rights, and who you think should...there is a such thing as human rights...but you, collectively, don't consider Muslims, and people of color to be quite human, do you? And, therefore, devoid of any rights, you, yourself would claim, as a human being? comment offensive, removed by admin

2 Replies

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;28483 wrote:

Impeachment hearing are not far off, now

For Clinton, right? I agree. They should be coming down the pike anytime now. Break out the Crisco and get in line. Laughing

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;28496 wrote:

People say that Attacking Iraq violated UN regulations but under those same regulations Clinton's attack on Milosevic was illegal too.

The difference between the resolution to go into Kosovo, as opposed to going into Iraq is, that in Kosovo there was an Army raping, murdering and basically attempting genocide of another ethnicity. There were no WMD in Iraq, which is what 95% of the resolution to invade Iraq was based on. Big ******* difference.

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;28502 wrote:

yeah, my prerogative, I guess...I'm just following suit...people on these boards say the most outlandish things, again, with no proof, or links, and it winds up being nothing more than opinion and propaganda...so, when in Rome....
"Due Process, in Gitmo"????? You mean the along with Abu-Gharib, the "stains" on our righteousness and standing on moral high ground? You didn't bring that up as a reference? You just didn't. Funny whom you think should have no rights, and who you think should...there is a such thing as human rights...but you, collectively, don't consider Muslims, and people of color to be quite human, do you? And, therefore, devoid of any rights, you, yourself would claim, as a human being? You people slay me..you have no credibility, no morality...and you're piss poor excuses for human beings. You are, in fact, not American, by definition.

not exactly

when Americans do these illegal things we're prosecuted by our own legal system as in Abu-Gharib. When terrorists do these things they're praised by thier people, that's the difference.

Regardless of your opinion the law under Geneva only extends legal rights to "legal combatants". Insurgents are not legal combatants and therefore may be held legally as they currently are. Trust me I had to take a class in Law of Armed Conflict every year from 99-2005.

And I'll warn you once about personal attacks, to include referring to members as "piss poor Human Beings"

I understand you need me to be racist to justify all your anger, but it's hardly the case

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;28502 wrote:

yeah, my prerogative, I guess...I'm just following suit...people on these boards say the most outlandish things, again, with no proof, or links, and it winds up being nothing more than opinion and propaganda...so, when in Rome....
"Due Process, in Gitmo"????? You mean the along with Abu-Gharib, the "stains" on our righteousness and standing on moral high ground? You didn't bring that up as a reference? You just didn't. Funny whom you think should have no rights, and who you think should...there is a such thing as human rights...but you, collectively, don't consider Muslims, and people of color to be quite human, do you? And, therefore, devoid of any rights, you, yourself would claim, as a human being? comment offensive, removed by admin

Since my comments were taken as offensive, by some, so much so, that they were removed...I hope, in kind, attention will be paid to the "personal attacks" leveled at me....perhaps not. Perhaps, it's do as I say, and not as do....and that's fine, too.

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

any offensive posts should be referred to the moderators, that red yield sign with the black vertical line will do the trick

0 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Aaron, thanks for highlighting my over-the-top manner. Seriously, I need to simmer down a bit. See? Even rednecks can 'see the light', once in a while. Yipper. Dang it.

1 Reply

Victory in Iraq, the Iran connection, and only the facts

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know