1
   

Victory in Iraq, the Iran connection, and only the facts

 
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:17 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;25736 wrote:
Siding with big money oil contracts


have you read any of my threads on green energy? How on earth could you think I'm pro big oil?

oh that's right, you don't know what you're talking about
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:20 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;25738 wrote:
well hell, let's just give up then. Apparently we've ***ed up so bad we can't even justify protecting our own way of life

which way is East? :beat:


Are you coming from the north or the south?

When America starts taking care of itself then our foreign affairs might not be so bad, but since we continually play chess in the middle east when we can't even win a game of checkers at home it stinks.

And Dranal, there's plenty of gas in Canada, Mexico and the US for my Honda, unfortunately, oil execs need tankers of gas for their H3's, so we will be on the M.E. nipple for a LONG time to come.
0 Replies
 
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:21 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;25739 wrote:
have you read any of my threads on green energy? How on earth could you think I'm pro big oil?

oh that's right, you don't know what you're talking about


Than stop bleeding black for Saudi. Stop excusing them because the guberment tells you they are a ok, because we get a million+ barrels of oil from them a day. Wake the **** up.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:22 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;25736 wrote:
Post something that makes sense, or just don't post. I know, I know, you have to maintain that uber post count so you have a reason to get out of bed in the morning.



Too bad we are still dealing with yesterdays problems, hell we're still dealing for problems from the 50's.



No, they actually weren't. CIA and 9/11 commission said that, so you can take it up with them. Maybe they were there on vacation or something, or trying to get something going, but they didn't.



You have only offered appeasement for big money oil, and that we turned a blind eye to Saudi because they are our biggest supplier of oil in the middle east.



Not the problem, A problem, but good try.



Was no terror connection, that changed when we invaded, and occupied, you can take up the CIA and 9/11 commission for pointing this out, and once again, good try, but fail.



Now you get it. If we weren't in Iraq, and had never invaded, Saddam would still be thumbing his nose at htem like he did before.



The only failure here is you. Siding with big money oil contracts, and offering excuses as to why we didn't deal with them as they should have been seeing as how this "war" we are fighting was catalysted by mostly Saudi who have "cleaned up their act" (that gets funnier every time I read it)
Quote:
Post something that makes sense, or just don't post. I know, I know, you have to maintain that uber post count so you have a reason to get out of bed in the morning.
Your the only reason i need. Mornin sunshine.
But to answer your question. Some thing your not used to doing.

You keep saying we are fighting an ideology correct? Then you say that ideology causes 9/11. Most of the ideology for 9/11 came form Saudi at the time. See the contradiction? Which is it, either we are fighting a ideology or a country? Our troop are in Iraq fighting a country or ideology? When we go into Iran, will we be fighting a country or ideology? Think before you answer?
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:28 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25742 wrote:
Your the only reason i need. Mornin sunshine.
But to answer your question. Some thing your not used to doing.

You keep saying we are fighting an ideology correct? Then you say that ideology causes 9/11. Most of the ideoligy for 9/11 came form Saudi at the time. See the contridiction? Which is it, either we are fighting a ideoligy or a country? Our troop are in Iraq fighting a country or ideoligy? When we go into Iran, will we be fighting a country or ideoligy? Think before you answer?


Nice try, but no, that's not a contradiction. We are not talking about the ideology, or trying to nail it down, we are talking about the physical terrorist themselves, and states that sponsor the ideology of terrorism, Saudi being one of them. One that we have choosen to as you guys say "give a pass" to.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:30 pm
@Silverchild79,
Now your not talking about it becuase it don't suit you, to bad. Stay on your side of the fence.
Quote:
we are talking about the physical terrorist themselves,
Your forgeting the reason they do what they do, ideoligy anyone?
Quote:
Saudi being one of them.
Prove it, lap 23 coming up.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:32 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25747 wrote:
Now your not talking about it becuase it don't suit you, to bad. Stay on your side of the fence.Prove it, lap 23 coming up.


You prove they don't. They provided the majority of attackers for the single most devastating terrorist attack in history...your move, or are you just going to babble on about laps or something?
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:33 pm
@Silverchild79,
By "they" who are you talking about and can you prove your statement? Or is all you are about to claim is an opinion? Your move?
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:39 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25750 wrote:
By "they" who are you talking about and can you prove your statement?


The US government "proved" it for me. They are the ones that threw together the list of attackers, unless you want to say they are lying about it.
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:44 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;25741 wrote:
Than stop bleeding black for Saudi. Stop excusing them because the guberment tells you they are a ok, because we get a million+ barrels of oil from them a day. Wake the *** up.


my support for Saudi stems from the fact that they've proven they're commited to distancing themselves from terror post 911, and they've provided our military with the land resources we've requested.

We have to buy our oil from somebody, do you drive your car to work? If you aren't willing to park your car maybe you should stop complaining who we buy our oil from. Better Saudi then Venezuela or Iran
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:45 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;25752 wrote:
The US government "proved" it for me. They are the ones that threw together the list of attackers, unless you want to say they are lying about it.

Got link? Just as i thought, nothing but opinion!
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 01:47 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;25755 wrote:
my support for Saudi stems from the fact that they've proven they're commited to distancing themselves from terror post 911, and they've provided our military with the land resources we've requested.

We have to buy our oil from somebody, do you drive your car to work? If you aren't willing to park your car maybe you should stop complaining who we buy our oil from. Better Saudi then Venezuela or Iran
Quote:
We have to buy our oil from somebody, do you drive your car to work?
Na, haven't you heard. 92 buys terrorfree oil.
Quote:
If you aren't willing to park your car maybe you should stop complaining who we buy our oil from.
Sorry he likes to complain and buy oil?
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:04 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25756 wrote:
Got link? Just as i thought, nothing but opinion!


You really are an ignorant fool.

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Press Release

FBI good enough for you? Nice yapping, put your tail between your legs and shut up.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:08 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;25765 wrote:
You really are an ignorant fool.

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Press Release

FBI good enough for you? Nice yapping, put your tail between your legs and shut up.
Quote:
FBI good enough for you?
I don't know are they also the ones that gave Bush false info?
I opened your link and the first thing that caught my eye is "The FBI releases 19 photographs of individuals believed to be the hijackers " So much for shuting up i guess i get to keep yapping, LOL.
I guess for some reason there were no witnesses's
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:08 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25757 wrote:
Na, haven't you heard. 92 buys terrorfree oil.Sorry he likes to complain and buy oil?


Like always, you have absolutely zero intelligent response, so you resort to ad homenim, good job. And yes, if we got off the nipple, I'd ride a bike.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:09 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25766 wrote:
I don't know are they also the ones that gave Bush false info?
I opened your link and the first thing that caught my eye is "The FBI releases 19 photographs of individuals believed to be the hijackers "


Take off you tinfoil hat, or put it on correctly.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:11 pm
@Silverchild79,
1) Khalid Almihdhar - Possible Saudi national

2) Majed Moqed - Possible Saudi national

3) Nawaf Alhazmi - Possible Saudi national

4) Salem Alhazmi - Possible Saudi national

Shall i go on?
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:12 pm
@Silverchild79,
You should of read your own link, LOL!
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:15 pm
@Silverchild79,
I counted 11 that they didn't even consider possible Saudi national? Are you sure there from Saudi?
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 02:15 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;25757 wrote:
Na, haven't you heard. 92 buys terrorfree oil.


huh? 5 characters
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/13/2025 at 09:34:54