0
   

Bible Party of the USA

 
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Jun, 2007 05:07 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;20292 wrote:
Recognizing an enemy and raising an alarm is not hate. Recognizing evil and giving it a rebuke is not hate.

Recognizing both and not doing something to defend yourself or those you count as your countrymen is hatred, of self and of your country.


I see nothing wrong with loathing crazy ideas. To me Islam is a false religion and major source of human suffering. That doesn't mean I would discriminate against individuals in my daily life.
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 06:20 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20348 wrote:
Exactly. You're starting to sound like an USAF Targeteer. Or were you a dagum pilot? Lots of pilots in my family. Almost became one myself.


Negative, try again. Pilots are taxi drivers. Sorry if I offend any pilots out there.
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 06:46 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20349 wrote:
I see nothing wrong with loathing crazy ideas. To me Islam is a false religion and major source of human suffering. That doesn't mean I would discriminate against individuals in my daily life.


I agree. All religions other than honoring the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel are false constructs of Satan meant to mislead humanity and cause hatred and chaos.

Definition of bigot - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionarymembers of a group
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 08:25 am
@Volunteer,
Definition of aggressive - Merriam-Webster Online DictionaryAGGRESSIVE implies a disposition to dominate often in disregard of others' rights or in determined and energetic pursuit of one's ends <was taught to be aggressive in his business dealings>. MILITANT also implies a fighting disposition but suggests not self-seeking but devotion to a cause, movement, or principle <militant protesters held a rally against racism>. ASSERTIVE suggests bold self-confidence in expression of opinion <the more assertive speakers dominated the forum>. SELF-ASSERTIVE connotes forwardness or brash self-confidence <a self-assertive young executive climbing the corporate ladder>.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 08:55 am
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;20405 wrote:
Negative, try again. Pilots are taxi drivers. Sorry if I offend any pilots out there.


Combat Control, Security Police or SAR.:headbang:
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 09:53 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20447 wrote:
Combat Control, Security Police or SAR.


___________________PJ
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 12:05 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;20405 wrote:
Negative, try again. Pilots are taxi drivers. Sorry if I offend any pilots out there.



Well I'm married to a helicopter pilot and I assure you when he does a scene call and has to pick up a badly injured person in some rural community and lands on a postage stamp rock and does it safely hardly meets the criteria of "Tax Driver". :beat:
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 03:03 pm
@Red cv,
Red;20501 wrote:
Well I'm married to a helicopter pilot and I assure you when he does a scene call and has to pick up a badly injured person in some rural community and lands on a postage stamp rock and does it safely hardly meets the criteria of "Taxi Driver".


Hi Red,

Sorry, had too many taxi drivers call me and those like me flying med techs.

Ok, let's call him a helo driver. Driver, because most helo pilots fly the roads, not the flight aids or instruments.

By the by, if he lands on a postage stamp rock, he chose the wrong landing pad. He's supposed to maintain a hover with one wheel or skid touching the rock, not land on it.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 09:23 am
@Volunteer,
Not to change the subject, but I am in favor of the formation of a Christian Party of America. I could support that, as long as it remained ecumenical in orientation.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 09:26 am
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;20566 wrote:
Hi Red,

Sorry, had too many taxi drivers call me and those like me flying med techs.

Ok, let's call him a helo driver. Driver, because most helo pilots fly the roads, not the flight aids or instruments.

By the by, if he lands on a postage stamp rock, he chose the wrong landing pad. He's supposed to maintain a hover with one wheel or skid touching the rock, not land on it.



Volly, ground-force aviation tactics vary from those of Navy and Air Force. Give credit where it's due. The Army and Marines know a helluva lot about helicopter warfare, especially the Army, given its vast experience in this regard in the 'Nam.
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 04:31 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20697 wrote:
Not to change the subject, but I am in favor of the formation of a Christian Party of America. I could support that, as long as it remained ecumenical in orientation.


The Bible Party should be a party of all Children of Israel.

This is not just a party for Christians. It is also for Jews. It is a political party for all children of Israel. It is for people who believe the Bible or Torah is the Word of God and are willing to take a risk and witness to that in the public arena. It is not for people who claim to be Christians and refuse to follow the example of Christ Jesus. It is not for Jewish people who refuse to follow David's example and take up arms against people who attempt to profane God and His Word. It is not for Jewish people or Christians who value their own safety more than proclaiming the Word of God and helping to create the conditions in which they can teach and raise their children according to the Word of God.

What is proposed is not forcing Protestantism or Catholicism on anyone. What is proposed is creating a political party that only accepts members who are literate, have read the Word of God, and understand the basic principles contained therein. Member must take tests to ensure they understand the Word of God. If they don't pass the test to the established standards, they can't be can't be officers in the party or candidates from the party. The party contains ethical standards as its basis. If a member or officer violates those standards, they are removed from the party.
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 04:32 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20699 wrote:
Volly, ground-force aviation tactics vary from those of Navy and Air Force. Give credit where it's due. The Army and Marines know a helluva lot about helicopter warfare, especially the Army, given its vast experience in this regard in the 'Nam.


I wasn't saying anything about Army or Navy, let alone the Marine Corps. It's all purple to me.
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 04:41 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;20697 wrote:
Not to change the subject, but I am in favor of the formation of a Christian Party of America. I could support that, as long as it remained ecumenical in orientation.


Romans 11: 1-32, “I ask, then, has God rejected His people? Absolutely not! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew. Or do you not know what the Scripture says in the Elijah section—how he pleads with God against Israel?

Lord, they have killed Your prophets, torn down Your altars; and I am the only one left, and they are trying to take my life!

But what was God's reply to him? I have left 7,000 men for Myself who have not bowed down to Baal. In the same way, then, there is also at the present time a remnant chosen by grace. Now if by grace, then it is not by works; otherwise grace ceases to be grace.

What then? Israel did not find what it was looking for, but the elect did find it. The rest were hardened, as it is written:

God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear, to this day.

And David says:

Let their feasting become a snare and a trap, a pitfall and a retribution to them.

Let their eyes be darkened so they cannot see, and their backs be bent continually.

I ask, then, have they stumbled so as to fall? Absolutely not! On the contrary, by their stumbling, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel jealous. Now if their stumbling brings riches for the world, and their failure riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full number bring!

Now I am speaking to you Gentiles. In view of the fact that I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, if I can somehow make my own people jealous and save some of them. For if their being rejected is world reconciliation, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead? Now if the firstfruits offered up are holy, so is the whole batch. And if the root is holy, so are the branches.

Now if some of the branches were broken off, and you, though a wild olive branch, were grafted in among them, and have come to share in the rich root of the cultivated olive tree, do not brag that you are better than those branches. But if you do brag—you do not sustain the root, but the root sustains you. Then you will say, "Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in." True enough; they were broken off by unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. For if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you either. Therefore, consider God's kindness and severity: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness toward you—if you remain in His kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off. And even they, if they do not remain in unbelief, will be grafted in, because God has the power to graft them in again. For if you were cut off from your native wild olive, and against nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these—the natural branches—be grafted into their own olive tree?

So that you will not be conceited, brothers, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery: a partial hardening has come to Israel until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written:

The Liberator will come from Zion; He will turn away godlessness from Jacob.

And this will be My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.

Regarding the gospel, they are enemies for your advantage, but regarding election, they are loved because of their forefathers, since God's gracious gifts and calling are irrevocable. As you once disobeyed God, but now have received mercy through their disobedience, they too have now disobeyed, [resulting] in mercy to you, so that they also now may receive mercy. For God has imprisoned all in disobedience, so that He may have mercy on all.”
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:12 pm
@Volunteer,
Have you seen this trailer?

It begins to describe what is happening in our schools of higher learning:

Indoctrinate U - Our Education. Their Politics.

Put it on hold for 30 seconds to reduce hicups.
0 Replies
 
One Man Clan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:58 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;10211 wrote:


Hmm...

Yep...

Ok...

Gotcha...

Everything checks out as: utterly retarded.
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:32 pm
@One Man Clan,
One Man Clan;20850 wrote:
Hmm...

Yep...

Ok...

Gotcha...

Everything checks out as: utterly retarded.


Thanks, I'm glad you disapprove. That means something, especially with your name. If you approved, I'd be worried.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:45 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;21034 wrote:
Thanks, I'm glad you disapprove. That means something, especially with your name. If you approved, I'd be worried.


I hope you aren't trying to be that ignorant on purpose, and imply that clan is synonumous with Klan.

Since you had so much fun posting definitions earlier

Main Entry: clan
Pronunciation: \ˈklan\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Scottish Gaelic clann offspring, clan, from Old Irish cland plant, offspring, from Latin planta plant
Date: 15th century
1 a: a Celtic group especially in the Scottish Highlands comprising a number of households whose heads claim descent from a common ancestor b: a group of people tracing descent from a common ancestor : family
2: a group united by a common interest or common characteristics


Main Entry: Klan
Pronunciation: \ˈklan\
Function: noun
Etymology: (Ku Klux) Klan
Date: 1867
: an organization of Ku Kluxers; also : a subordinate unit of such an organization
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 06:18 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;20566 wrote:
Hi Red,

Sorry, had too many taxi drivers call me and those like me flying med techs.

Ok, let's call him a helo driver. Driver, because most helo pilots fly the roads, not the flight aids or instruments.

By the by, if he lands on a postage stamp rock, he chose the wrong landing pad. He's supposed to maintain a hover with one wheel or skid touching the rock, not land on it.


Nope they land the aircraft in Canada and get this the co-joe actually pushes the gourny. IFR in Canada with twin engines is the lawwwwwwwwwww. Nothing wrong in being a med tech an honourable thing it is.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 09:56 pm
@Red cv,
Red;21046 wrote:
Nope they land the aircraft in Canada and get this the co-joe actually pushes the gourny. IFR in Canada with twin engines is the lawwwwwwwwwww. Nothing wrong in being a med tech an honourable thing it is.


PJs rule.:thumbup:
One Man Clan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Jun, 2007 10:46 am
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;21034 wrote:
Thanks, I'm glad you disapprove. That means something, especially with your name. If you approved, I'd be worried.



My name? It kicks ass. It doesn't get any cooler than my name.

The Bible Party? They don't kick ass. It doesn't get any less cool than the Bible Party.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/16/2025 at 02:15:52