Western Acceptance of War

The thing is that the war was declared on the wrong country, and now it is a big mess. Is Iraq any better without Hussin, we shall wait and see, since right now it is unstable. The West likes to be 'peaceful' and yet all the previous peace and prosperity came with a pricetag, the lifes of many people who fought in earlier wars. Fighting is a part of human history, and yet today people think that peace is just possible by protesting enough, by complaining enough, by ignoring enough. These are always those people who have never volunteered or enlisted and those are always people who have not been touched by events like 9/11.
Peace comes with a price, and sometimes the price is to stand by what you believe in and by defending it.
The peaceniks are those who would rather be photographed socialising with other peaceniks, and shouting words in a safe and abundant country, all awhile brave soldiers are protecting and defending the freedom in which they are laughing, sipping coffee, and congradulating each other on how peaceful they are...
It is more convenient to not accept a war, while enjoying the fruits of other people's sacrific.

I wonder what would a peacenik do if someone came to their home, ordered them out and preceded to take over their home. The left on their own free will so in effect they gave their home away. Would the fight to regain their home, or go to welfare and demand another home. I'm guessing the latter because they seem to lack the moral fortitude or spine to stand up for what is right and just.

complacent. Its excessive materialism has bred over-confidence, bordering on delusional, 'other-worldly' thinking. Reality is beyond its grasp, because it so desperately wants to remain in the lap of luxury. No price is too great, so it seems, for it to maintain its momentary, hedonistic lifestyle. The West is lost. It will take a nuclear attack to motivate it to fight for its survival. :no:

well here is one example of what a peacenik will pay, Jane Fonda fought through the courts to get money back she donated to Harvard {l think, anyone one of the big universities} yep, she wanted it back since she was broke...

and so, with the Islamic stance on issuing FATWAS to take over the world, in order for peace we need to hand over the world to them, just roll over and surrender everything...

then, it is not over, for as we allow Islamists to take everything, we have to look at the ancient teachings as they are being taught today...all unmurdered and untortured non_muslims are to be Dhimintude, according to the scriptures...in other words extortion in exchange for life.

examples such as the Imam in Australia for example who, in front of a crowd of five hundred followers, stated that the women deserved it.

examples such as the FATWAS issued to murder all Americans, to wipe Israel off the map, etc, etc.

So these peaceniks are asking for peace, and yet in supporting the war we too are seeking peace.

The difference is the price.

The pricetag of the peaceniks is either not thought out and idealistic rather than realistic, or they are willing to hand over all their homes and worldly possessions...

Which catagory do you think Janie is in?

yikes, l know l read that and thought...l just don't want to imagine this, l will concentrate on how the troops are going to succeed and this will somehow work out...

Really, Jane took your friend to court? My oh my, so it wasn't just university students she has tried to take advantage of...it is funny how she is the first to jump in on a 'peace' march, posing for the cameras etc., and yet be unwilling to pay the price for what she is claiming is the right way...what a anorexic silly nit-whit...

And about the pee, you realize that pee is an anticeptic? In the war they would pee on wounds in order to clean them...an acid. So you in fact kind of made her fence "cleansed", and considering how she treated you friend, that was one dirty fence...HA!!!

And about the pee, you realize that pee is an anticeptic? In the war they would pee on wounds in order to clean them...an acid. So you in fact kind of made her fence "cleansed", and considering how she treated you friend, that was one dirty fence...HA!!!

I am a sworn pacifist, but the non-violent solution does not belong to the USA, the rest of the world needs to step up and help out. I've said it once, and I'll say it again, if radical Islam beats the USA, then who is next? Here in Brazil, 80% of the population is catholic, that alone to them is reason enough for an attack. I do not intend on letting them do as they wish, who holds greater blame, the ones who destroyed to world, or the ones who sat around and let it happen?

I do not intend on letting them do as they wish, who holds greater blame, the ones who destroyed to world, or the ones who sat around and let it happen?

combatting Islam, and fight it with unwavering commitment. There should be TWO fronts -- military, first and foremost, and politico-cultural, whereby Muslim immigration into the Greater West is terminated permanently. This doesn't mean the West should submit itself to Zionist manipulation in the process, however; the West should fight first for itself, and only then the security and well-being of others. Yes, world improvement is the ultimate objective, but first the homefront must be secured. Setting Islam back another century or two, even farther back than it already is, appears imperative to the survival of both the West and Planet Earth, at large.