49
   

Is the Confederate Flag a symbol of racism?

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 02:47 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Posters like you have taken crap for years whilst they down thumbed you for being you...these same senile clowns think they are freedom lovers...no thinking brain in the world would do what they do, it is pure emotion....emotion called hate . They would do well under a Nazi flag but here they are complaining about the Rebel flag...perhaps because it never feels like you have destroyed something if it still has a symbol .


Ya sure, but I long ago learned enough to know that I should only care about truth.

Here I am at over 50 years old but I learned such basic stuff by the time I was 25....based upon the ignorance I find around me I feel blessed actually.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  3  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 12:34 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
That's a good post Bill
Let's take another look at Roof's flag and what it meant when it was designed by the editor of the Savannah Daily Morning News William Thompson.
http://thumbs.mic.com/ZWYxN2U2Y2QxOSMvMWk2Zk9MWHI1TC1hZUtvOE94UE54TW9MRzdvPS80N3gzNzM6NDI0MXgyODQzLzkwMHg1MzAvZmlsdGVyczpxdWFsaXR5KDcwKS9odHRwOi8vczMuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS9wb2xpY3ltaWMtaW1hZ2VzL3NieW9uZnBvdjMxNnUyYjJreGl0aWRnOHM4a2gwZ2hxdzBkdG5tazZpeXhnNmh0aWV6NWNjeG5nMGJiaGp4emwuanBn.jpg
http://images.mic.com/qspq412weu1h5tf6zu6aumwxcb0jfrcwkioo2lpyzyrxqiwiuaddukgddhrsj7mv.jpg
If that's not clear enough
http://images.mic.com/p7t9d1qym1x3bcgzeuom4bsxi3x9dpfjpk3ixoqxxrpgkxw0tpwputz7h1ywggoa.jpg
Quoting Tom McKay
Quote:
Thompson knew what the flag meant. So did the Confederates. So did Dylann Roof. So when right-wingers defend that flag as "just heritage," it seems reasonable to surmise that they know precisely what that heritage (and that institution) means too.

ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 12:40 pm
@panzade,
They know what the "heritage" reflected by the flag means. They don't like being called on it.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 01:37 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

They know what the "heritage" reflected by the flag means. They don't like being called on it.


It is the flag of the losing side of our civil war. Till now Yankees were tolerant of those in the South that wanted to fly it, who wanted t show pride in the losing effort, but no longer are. This is part of a wide program of the thought police to stifle unwanted conversation and the presenting of unwanted ideas, it is part of the program to turn us into the Borg. The LEft has this effort to degrade freedom as being Gods work, but what it is is fear, fear that free men when allowed to think for themselves will be infected by bad ideas and kill the human race. The world is now too dangerous to allow freedom they think.

They are not only wrong, they are a force of evil. They lack confidence in their own species, even after all that we have accomplished. They think that humans need to be put into bondage for our own good.

**** them, I will not cooperate in this bad deed.
engineer
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 02:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

It is the flag of the losing side of our civil war. Till now Yankees were tolerant of those in the South that wanted to fly it, who wanted t show pride in the losing effort, but no longer are.

The flag was never flown to show pride in the losing effort. You couldn't find the flag flying in 1900. It was resurrected to show resistance to efforts to stop Jim Crow.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 02:51 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

It is the flag of the losing side of our civil war. Till now Yankees were tolerant of those in the South that wanted to fly it, who wanted t show pride in the losing effort, but no longer are.

The flag was never flown to show pride in the losing effort. You couldn't find the flag flying in 1900. It was resurrected to show resistance to efforts to stop Jim Crow.


It was resurrected to show displeasure in the fact that the Washington took great delight in rubbing it in the face of Southerners that they had lost. This was about respect. There are costs when a nation tells an entire region that might makes right, when there is no attempt to show empathy or respect to the loser.

This stuff about racism was all tacked on recently, as a justification that would sell for doing what we wanted anyways, telling southerners again to stuff it.
engineer
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 03:03 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

It was resurrected to show displeasure in the fact that the Washington took great delight in rubbing it in the face of Southerners that they had lost.

It was resurrected to show absolute refusal to bow down to legal decisions and public sentiment that said that black US citizens should have equal rights to white US citizens.
hawkeye10 wrote:

This stuff about racism was all tacked on recently, as a justification that would sell for doing what we wanted anyways, telling southerners again to stuff it.

The racism has always been there. That was the purpose. What is new is the refusal to tolerate it without comment.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 03:05 pm
@engineer,
TO render some support to your point with Hawkee Heres a chunk from Yoni Applebaum''s article in the most recent ATLANTIC.its called,WHY IS THE FLAG STILL THERE?

Quote:
After the surrender in 1865, Confederate flags were folded and put away. They were most likely to be spotted at memorials or cemeteries. Even after the hopeful decade of Reconstruction gave way to the violent repression of Redemption, open displays of the flag remained rare. There was no need for a banner to signal defiance; Jim Crow reigned unchallenged.

The flag slowly crept back into public life over the ensuing decades, saluted at veterans’ reunions, promoted by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, even carried into battle by units from the South. By the mid-twentieth century, the flags were also waved by football fans, and sold to tourists.

But as a political symbol, the flag was revived when northern Democrats began to press for an end to the South’s system of racial oppression. In 1948, the Dixiecrats revolted against President Harry Truman—who had desegregated the armed forces and supported anti-lynching bills. The movement began in Mississippi in February of 1948, with thousands of activists “shouting rebel yells and waving the Confederate flag,” as the Associated Press reported at the time. Some actually removed old, mothballed flags from the trunks where they had until then been gathering dust.

At the Democratic convention that July, nine southern states backed Georgia’s Senator Richard Russell over Truman, parading around the floor behind a waving Confederate flag to the strains of Dixie. The Dixiecrats reconvened in Birmingham, nominating South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for the presidency. Sales of Confederate flags, long moribund, exploded. Stores could not keep them in stock. The battle flag became the symbol of segregation.

The flag soon spread. It fluttered from the radio antennas of cars and motorcycles, festooned towels and trinkets, and was exhibited on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line. Some displayed it as a curiosity, a general symbol of rebellion against authority, or an emblem of regional pride. The United Daughters of the Confederacy were split on how to respond, some pleased to see young people showing interest, others calling the proliferation of flags a “desecration.” Newspapers tried to explain the craze, citing explanations from football fans to historically themed balls.


The black press did not find the phenomena quite so baffling. “In a large measure,” wrote the Chicago Defender in 1951, “the rebel craze is an ugly reaction to the remarkable progress of our group.” That was true in the North, as well as the South.

Over the next two decades, the flag was waved at Klan rallies, at White Citizens’ Council meetings, and by those committing horrifying acts of violence. And despite the growing range of its meanings in pop culture, as a political symbol, it offered little ambiguity.

Georgia inserted the battle flag into its state flag in 1956. Two years later, South Carolina made it a crime to desecrate the Confederate flag. And then, on the centennial of the day South Carolina opened fire on Fort Sumter came in 1961, it hoisted the battle flag above its Capitol.

It was a symbol of heritage—but that heritage was hateful. Two state delegations, in Charleston to mark that 1961 centennial, found themselves barred from the hotel where the ceremony was to take place because they included black members. President Kennedy had to issue an executive order moving the commemoration to the Charleston Navy Base. And when the centennial ended, the flag stayed, proclaiming that South Carolina might have lost the war, but that it was determined not to surrender its opposition to racial equality.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 03:24 pm
Resistance to school desegregation . . .

http://cwmemory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/image005-e1314960856839.jpg

During the march on Montgomery, 1965 . . .

http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/22/34/16/4834194/3/628x471.jpg

Response to the voter registration drive . . .

http://www.thehawkeye.com/assets/9231950/IQ517864931.jpg

Supporters at a rally to preserve Jim Crow laws . . .

http://traverse.us.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/17-61_Spider-Martin_confed-flag_738.jpg

Celebrating "White Power" . . .

http://images.politico.com/global/2015/06/26/150626_levine_whitepower_ap.jpg

Another response to civil rights marchers . . .

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-JB217_0623fl_J_20150623130635.jpg

Response to the integration of "Ole Miss" . . .

http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/119/3426/640/olemiss1962whitesupremacistaverageamericansprotestintegration.jpg
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 04:16 pm
@hawkeye10,
Did you skip every single history class?

We know better than that in Canada.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 04:17 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
The racism has always been there. That was the purpose. What is new is the refusal to tolerate it without comment.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 05:13 pm
I have been thinking about this, and am going to weigh in.

Those of you that say the confederate flag is a symbol of racism and must be banned are overlooking another object that must be banned from public view.

It is a symbol ogracism, mass murder, genocide and pure evil.
I amtalking about the Volkswagon.

After all, that car was designed by and built by the Nazis, and the money from that car was used to finance their crimes.

Now, if we use the same "logic" that those whomoppose the confederate flag are using, we must say the following...
Anyone that owns or drives a VW is an obvious Nazi sympathizer, someone that supports the ideals the Nazi regime had.
If you own or drive a VW, you must be a supporter of mass murder and genocide, and you still believe in those ideas, why else would you drive a VW.

The funny thing is,the people that want the confederate flag gone cannot disagree with me, because I am using the same logic that they are.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 05:17 pm
@mysteryman,
But the VW is not being trotted out by Nazi sympathizers while oppressing Jews. White racists wrap themselves in the stars and bars when they engage their racist activities.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 05:36 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

But the VW is not being trotted out by Nazi sympathizers while oppressing Jews. White racists wrap themselves in the stars and bars when they engage their racist activities.


you sound like these idiots who think that we can degrade gang activity by forbidding people in certain places and of a certain age from wearing certain colors. Yes, we can always choose to take away freedom, but that may not help solve the "problem" being addressed. If you want to defeat racism then you need to be able to come up with a better idea, and you need to be willing to do the work of selling it. Trying to do it instead by removing freedom is laziness, rarely will it work, and it causes a lot of other problems....for instance the growing feeling that our government is no long our government. In a lot of ways our approach to isms is a lot like our approach to anything we dont like about how our body works, pop a pill because it is easy, and by the way that pill that might or might not help with some minor irritation has as one of its side effects that it might ruin your liver and kill you.

Racism does not kill, people kill. Racism annoys some people, but trying tio solve it by having the government remove our freedom is likely going to have the side effect of revolt against the government, and an unwillingness to even hear out the elite when they babble on about what they think the rest of us should do. To the extent that the elite and/or the government could possible help us solve some of the major problems that this society is accumulating that would be a bad thing. It reminds me of the jews who played chamber music to those marching off to the gas chamber, sure they help keep the gas chamber fodder sedate, but it was never going to solve the actual problem. Sure, we can make it so that your day is not disturbed by accidently seeing a flag that you dont like, but that is not going to do a damn thing about this idea that you are trying to kill.

Do the ******* work, convince people that racism is not a good idea....if you can, and stop putting so much effort into enforcing some wacked out concept of mandatory politeness by removing freedom.

I am so sick of lazy people who have no problem abusing other people in the attempt to get everyone acting and thinking as is wanted. You run your life only, stay the **** out of mine.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 05:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
WHat did Edgar say that enflamed your gizzard there HAwkee? He spoke the goddam truth. Aint no neonazis out there riding around in Beetles. They all drive Ford F250's or Dosge Rms with Stars and Bars in the bed and a "forget Hell" sticker next to their gu racks.

I dont think a neo Nazi would parade around in a VW any more than theyd carry the Mogen David Flag
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 06:02 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
WHat did Edgar say that enflamed your gizzard there HAwkee? He spoke the goddam truth. Aint no neonazis out there riding around in Beetles. They all drive Ford F250's or Dosge Rms with Stars and Bars in the bed and a "forget Hell" sticker next to their gu racks.

Neo Nazis have as much right to drive what they want as I do. We need to stop obsessing about the trivial, stop using our fear of ideas that we dont like to justify degrading freedom. We need to start attacking bad ideas with better ideas.

Over the years we Americans have gotten supremely self righteous and lazy....it is time to snap out of it.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 06:29 pm
@hawkeye10,
but you were the one who blew up at EDgar by being trivial . Edgar merely responded to another member.
I think you havent come down from last nights partying Either that or youve been hanging around Ionus too much, youre beginning to adopt his "debate skills"
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 06:39 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

but you were the one who blew up at EDgar by being trivial . Edgar merely responded to another member.
I think you havent come down from last nights partying Either that or youve been hanging around Ionus too much, youre beginning to adopt his "debate skills"

you are hung up on personalities. While I understand the entertainment value of that I am here to talk about ideas, and dont care who is speaking them
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 06:44 pm
@hawkeye10,
well then , why not get started on some "Ideas" rather than call everyone names or yell trivialities.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Reply Sun 28 Jun, 2015 06:46 pm
@edgarblythe,
Agreed, but there are people alive who suffered under the nazi brutality.
Their feelings must be taken into consideration.


If you want to ban the confederate flag even though there is not one person alive today that was a slave or owned slaves, at least here in the U.S., then it makes sense, using that same logic, to bN something that represents a regime that caused and is still causing hatred, fear, and suffering to people still alive today.
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:54:07