http://www.counterquo.org/assets/files/reference/The-Use-and-Misuse-of-Data-on-Rape.pdf
Prevalence of rape in the military is another area in which media misstatements often
occur. Perhaps this is because research reports on the military commonly report on a range
of conduct, from rape to unwanted sexual attention, sexual coercion, or sexist behavior.
Unfortunately, it is altogether common to find the larger percentages for sexual harassment
incorrectly cited as rape prevalence figures.
The erroneous one-in-three figure is commonly
cited by journalists writing about rape in the military (Wright, 2008).In addition, some research on sexual assault in the military reports that large numbers of
recruits are victims of sexual assault before they enter the military (a provocative finding).
That, however, should not be confused with a percentage of those who are rape victims
while in the military. Data from medical and mental health providers that large percentages
of women patients were victims of sexual assault should also not be confused with general
prevalence figures. For example, one recent piece on the subject of rape in the military
(Harman, 2008), began with data that 41% of female veterans seen at a VA health center
T H E U S E ( A N D M I S U S E ) O F D A T A O N R A P E :
R E S T OR I N G S E X U A L A S S A U L T T O T H E N A T I O N A L A G E N D A
P A G E 1 6
D O C UME N T T I T L E
said they were victims of sexual assault while in the military. Although this is important and
interesting data, and some indication of a problem, it should not be cited as proof for the
prevalence of sexual assault in the military, since it reports on a subset of women who are
seeking help for a problem that may have been directly related to the sexual assault.
III. Strategies of the Rape Denial Campaign
A. Attacking