Gay Marriage Vote Passes in DC City Council

My side, the majority side, the vast majority side, is hamstrung because we can't use the words we would like to use. We have to discuss these matters in the terms the minority won't be offended by. We are censored. Free speech has been set aside.

More than just women support homosexuals.

Supporters of gay rights are supporting the rights of both male and female homosexuals, so your statement is once again, half-assed.

Actually, it was a man...

we know that gay marriage has had no effect on the institution.

The idea that if we let gays get marriage the institution will collapse is the most half-witted attempt to mask bigotry ever.

Totally bored with your posts.

you are perfectly free to use whatever words you like here. In fact, I can't understand why you don't.

Quote:

More than just women support homosexuals.

If you draw a diagram with circles, you will see that the big circle has homosexual supporters in it, whilst the two smaller circles has men and women. Addressing one of the smaller circles does not affect the other smaller circle. Quite simple, really.

Quote:

Supporters of gay rights are supporting the rights of both male and female homosexuals, so your statement is once again, half-assed.

Again, I refer you to the circles you had to draw to understand the first part.

Quote:

Actually, it was a man...

You think the woman's movement was started in 2009 by a man ? Now THAT is half arsed.

Quote:

we know that gay marriage has had no effect on the institution.

You can qoute a study that shows this ? If you cant, I understand.

Quote:

The idea that if we let gays get marriage the institution will collapse is the most half-witted attempt to mask bigotry ever.

The idea that if we let homosexuals (they stopped being gay when aids thinned their ranks) get marriage the institution will improve is the most half-witted attempt to glorify sticking a cock in an arsehole ever.

we can observe for ourselves that conservatives claim was false.

Your default to male homosexuality and specifically the intercourse aspect of their relationship is gross reduction of individuals to single dimensions.

a pretend diagram

this has nothing to do with a women's movement

Quote:

we can observe for ourselves that conservatives claim was false.

No we cant. Your assumption is that all damage done to marriage is observable even to the not married. This is like saying all white ant damage can be seen from the street, even by a blind person.

Quote:

this has nothing to do with a women's movement

I dont give a damn what you think it is about. That was what I was talking about. If you dont like it, go talk to someone else.

You know why so many women support homosexuals ? Most women at some stage experiment with other women. If there is anything wrong with it, then they might develop a guilty conscience..we cant have improper acts followed by a guilty conscience.
Women also want protection and if men are going to draw the line at anyone who has sex with men, then it could be the thin end of the wedge. Better to fight the war on someone else's turf. Women want protection AND equality...you can tell this policy was designed by a woman.

Once again, the bill was not about a women's movement, and it was submitted by a man and it was about same sex marriage.

nor do they demonstrate any weakening in their marriage

You can not be bothered turning back a page so I present it here again where you can not continue your stupid ignorance of what I said and go on in your own direction like a druggy.

Quote:

You know why so many women support homosexuals ? Most women at some stage experiment with other women. If there is anything wrong with it, then they might develop a guilty conscience..we cant have improper acts followed by a guilty conscience.
Women also want protection and if men are going to draw the line at anyone who has sex with men, then it could be the thin end of the wedge. Better to fight the war on someone else's turf. Women want protection AND equality...you can tell this policy was designed by a woman.

Perhaps you are not aware that a bill is a political piece of paper ? I was talking about the politics of women in voting for a bill and you have been on a tangent about ...well I am not sure..probably you dont know either.

Quote:

Once again, the bill was not about a women's movement, and it was submitted by a man and it was about same sex marriage.

??????

Quote:

nor do they demonstrate any weakening in their marriage

You are avoiding answering questions on this very point. How do you know ? What weaknesses are people looking for ? Are you leading a survey team or are you making it up ?

A male member of the DC city council submits a bill to have the same sex marriage recognized. The bill is successfully passed. Simple.

The onus is on the people who claim it does affect marriage to demonstrate a state's compelling interest in keeping marriage to just heterosexuals. Being that the bigots fail completely at demonstrating this, there's nothing left to prove.

You know why so many women support homosexuals ? Most women at some stage experiment with other women. If there is anything wrong with it, then they might develop a guilty conscience..we cant have improper acts followed by a guilty conscience.

Women also want protection and if men are going to draw the line at anyone who has sex with men, then it could be the thin end of the wedge. Better to fight the war on someone else's turf. Women want protection AND equality...you can tell this policy was designed by a woman.

How do you know ?Are you leading a survey team or are you making it up ?

More women " particularly those in their late teens and 20s " are experimenting with bisexuality or at least feel more comfortable reporting same-sex encounters, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The survey, released Thursday by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, found that 11.5 percent of women, ages 18 to 44, said they’ve had at least one sexual experience with another women in their lifetimes, compared with about 4 percent of women, ages 18 to 59, who said the same in a comparable survey a decade earlier.

For women in their late teens and 20s, the percentage rose to 14 percent in the more recent survey.

“Instead of just anecdotes and stories that raise people’s anxieties, I think it’s best to have real numbers,” said William Mosher, the statistician who oversaw the report. “And now we have those.”

A rite of passage?
When it comes to women and same-sex relationships, Mosher said it would be worth studying why young women seek such relationships, and whether they may be trying to avoid diseases more commonly spread through sex with men.

But some experts who study sexuality say it’s even more likely that many college students simply see experimentation as a rite of passage.

“It’s very safe in the academic community; no one thinks anything of it,” said Elayne Rapping, a professor of American studies at the University of Buffalo who has written about sexuality.

“But to some extent there’s more talk than action,” she added, noting that the bisexuality label has become a “badge of courage” for some college women, even those who only date men. Meanwhile, she said, men who have same-sex experiences are often less likely to talk about it publicly.

The trend among college women has prompted some sexual behavior experts to light-heartedly refer to the term “LUG,” or “lesbian until graduation,” said Craig Kinsley, a neuroscientist at the University of Richmond who studies the biology of sexual orientation and gender.