Amanda Knox

After what he said about my kids, you're having a laugh.

Izzythepush, there is no one more opposed to Oralloy's hateful abnormal rhetoric than I, and so I place him on ignore.

For instance, by all accounts one can see Oralloy is not 100% sound....like what normal person would belittle or denigrate the parents (Kerchers) whose child was brutally murdered?

Or slander the murder victim beyond description because people refer Amanda Knox as a SLUT?

As civilized human beings, supposedly with all our faculties, why would we lower ourselves to making fun of someone who is obviously troubled mentally?

Are we so INSECURE that in our anger we lash out at people who deserve our compassion and understanding?

Oralloy is who he is. His "certainty" regarding the Amanda Knox trial, especially since he was not an eye witness or given classified evidence by both sides of the isle (the Defense and the Prosecutor) regarding said case,

One's certainty means without doubt and there are so still so many questions regarding Knox that might never be resolved.

Oralloy is merely displaying the role he was born into.

Stop your sanctimonious drivel. I'm not going to sit back while a low life piece of crap like Oralboy insults the memory of a beautiful British girl.

You may feel sorry for him because his existence is so miserable, no friends, no chance of ever having a lover and a general fear of going into town, but he decided to be a low life piece of crap so the gloves are off.

Amanda Knox alibi threatened as Raffaele Sollecito abandons her in ‘new’ defence strategy

Amanda Knox’s former boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito has made a fresh appeal that could undermine her alibi for what happened on the night the British student Meredith Kercher was killed in Italy.

In a further bid to distance his defence from that of his former lover, Sollecito told a press conference in Rome that he was unable to say where Knox had been during the early part of the that evening in Perugia.

Lawyers speaking for the Italian said that when he had previously described being with Knox that day he “always meant he spent the night with Amanda”.

“But for the entire first part of the evening, they were not together. It’s this first part of the evening that’s new [to his defence],” his lawyer Giulia Bongiorno was reported as saying.

Prior to the press conference, various members of the Italian press had quoted sources in Sollecito’s legal team as saying he had been “home alone that night” or that he was “only sure about the fact that he was at home”, clearly opening up the possibility that Knox was not there.

You're the one projecting your sick fantasies onto other people's children.

You're a pathetic hate filled piece of excrement with absolutely no redeeming features, and an object lesson in how never feeling the embrace of another human being can turn someone into a festering bag of malice.

You're the most disgusting creature on A2K, which is why most people have you on ignore.

It's pretty clear what you are.

After what he said about my kids, you're having a laugh.

Stop your sanctimonious drivel. I'm not going to sit back while a low life piece of crap like Oralboy insults the memory of a beautiful British girl.

You may feel sorry for him because his existence is so miserable, no friends, no chance of ever having a lover and a general fear of going into town, but he decided to be a low life piece of crap so the gloves are off.

Oralloy not only insults Meredith Kercher, he insults all of Italy, and those posters who criticize Israel.

No one is spared in Oralloy's eyes who attack Amanda.

Astonishingly enough, Oralloy equates "grinding little newborn Italian babies into food for dogs to eat" as equivalent to one offering their opinion they "believe Amanda Knox to be guilty!" Oralloy's assessment of this proves he is someone with a flawed mental judgement...unable to discern the vast difference between opinion and actual deed.

Oralloy's entire defense of the seemingly pathological Amanda Knox

borders on a demonstrative derangement

and he doesn't respect any poster who oppose his PERSONAL SENSE OF JUSTICE!

Obviously, this is one poster whose judgement is peculiarly inverted.

Critizing Amanda Knox and any subject Oralloy deems objectionable, is a pure waste of time,

I don't know why you keep having to mention my teaching experience as if that has any relevance at all.

If he had said the comments about the Kerchers on twitter in Britain he would have been jailed.

If America had similar legislation outlawing hate speech and deliberately causing unnecessary distress I would not have to take him to task.

Amanda Knox alibi threatened as Raffaele Sollecito abandons her in ‘new’ defence strategy

You have a really miserable, pathetic life.

How do you cope with the fact that almost everyone you have any dealings with finds you disgusting?

Don't expect an answer from MIT, she's put you on ignore, like most people.

She thinks that's the best way to deal with someone who clearly has substantive mental health issues.

I take the opposite approach, just because you're a sad, friendless loser with no chance of ever getting laid, doesn't mean that we should let the filth you spout go unchallenged.

In the words of Edmund Burke, All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

She's entitled to her opinion of course, but I think it's the same attitude that lead to rise of the Nazis.

Btw, you know Knox is guilty,

you wouldn't be quite so erotically obsessed with her.

Tick tock, tick tock.

Obviously Sollecito didn't listen to you

This morning, he told in a press conference in Rome he still believes Amanda Knox is innocent but says his defence did not depend on hers.
He claimed that his innocence was proved by the very elements which the Florence appeals court had used to convict them both.

The press conference was aired live - you really can't blame anyone for quoting what he and his lawyer actually said.

Still, unless you hear the words from his own mouth (and without editing), it is best to always have a grain of skepticism given the long history of untrue articles.

oralloy wrote:

Still, unless you hear the words from his own mouth (and without editing), it is best to always have a grain of skepticism given the long history of untrue articles.

It's still online on various sites. So no problem to verify that at all.

That depends. Did he speak in English? If he spoke in Italian, it might be hard to verify.

If he spoke in English, how do we know that "what is online" is unedited?