Amanda Knox

@Moment-in-Time,

Quote:

People who indulge in this kind of vicious slander against others appear to house a perversion, that type of behavior that deviate from normal.

Hi MIT. In my experience, Usato (oral boy) reacts somewhat better to the iggy button than to any discussion: after a year of talking to himself he almost behave like a normal human being. Then you can post to him for a couple of days before he starts going off to barbecuing babies land again...

3 Replies

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

Usato

You know, I bet it would be pretty funny if someone dug up Meredith's corpse, photographed it, and posted the pictures all over the internet so the Kercher scum could not help but be exposed to what the current state of her corpse is.

Olivier5 wrote:

(oral boy)

It's a shame you resort to childish name-calling whenever you are confronted with facts that you can't cope with.

Olivier5 wrote:

reacts somewhat better to the iggy button than to any discussion:

It is pretty silly for you to represent your childish name-calling as "discussion".

It is true that I likely react better to ignore than to your childish name-calling. Your childish name-calling might require occasional retaliation, whereas silence from you is harmless enough that no response would likely ever be required.

But I would react to discussion in an even better yet manner: I would respond in kind. But you're not capable of conducting a discussion of this topic, are you? All you want to do is revel in atrocities against the innocent.

Olivier5 wrote:

after a year of talking to himself he almost behave like a normal human being.

I always behave like a normal human being. You're the one who supports sending innocent people to prison.

And if you put me on ignore, that does not mean I'm talking to myself. You forget that there are other people besides you, and many of them possess the ethics and morality that you lack.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

. In my experience, Usato (oral boy) reacts somewhat better to the iggy button than to any discussion: after a year of talking to himself he almost behave like a normal human being. Then you can post to him for a couple of days before he starts going off to barbecuing babies land again...

Yup.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Yup.

Did you forget that it's me who has you on ignore, and it's you who is desperately begging me to pay attention to you?

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Ignore me then. I have no interest in conversing with excrement.

Your penultimate post showed there are no depths to which you will not sink.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

It is true that I likely react better to ignore than to your childish name-calling. Your childish name-calling might require occasional retaliation, whereas silence from you is harmless enough that no response would likely ever be required.

LOL. That must be why you kept posting to me dozens of times a day for months, changing ID every day to get passed the iggy function, in spite of getting no reply from me whatsoever... like an unrequited lover or a child trying to grab his mom's attention.

Beside your atrocious fantasies, your imbecility, and the lack of any interest on my side for the particular legal case that obsess you more than anything else, another reason to ignore you is that you keep repeating yourself. Is that a mark of dementia or something? In any case it is very boring. How many times can you repeat "childish name-calling" in the same paragraph? Grow up, at least lexically.

Another reason to avoid you, and let that be a warning for all, is that your serial killer tendencies may one day get acted upon. A sociopath like you, devoid of empathy, and harboring tortuous sexual and murderous fantasies, is the perfect profile. Not that you could become dangerous for any of us I think, but you could become a hazard for society.

So A2Kers, beware. You can toy with the troll as much as you'd like, you can feed it and you can loathe it and excite it if you find it funny. But in the end, is the cheap kick you get out of it worth the multiple damages done to this board moral environment, to Usato's own mental health, and to a poster's peace of mind?

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

Did you forget that it's me who has you on ignore

That's obviously a lie, or you wouldn't be writing to izzy...

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

LOL. That must be why you kept posting to me dozens of times a day for months, changing ID every day to get passed the iggy function, in spite of getting no reply from me whatsoever... like an unrequited lover or a child trying to grab his mom's attention.

I know you're a dishonest scumbag, Olivier, but try not to be so dishonest. There was almost nothing accurate about your above depiction of events.

If you post something that needs to be responded to, I will respond to it. It if happens that you have me on ignore and do not even know that I've debunked your nonsense, that is fine.

The changing IDs thing was not aimed at you (at least not you alone). You freaks at one point threatened to try to silence my defense of the innocent by subjecting me to fraudulent abuse reports. I told you guys that I had up to that point respected everyone's right to put me on ignore, but if you did as you threatened, I would take away your ability to put me on ignore.

And I did not change IDs every day. I generated a new ID for every single post.

I don't bluff. If you freaks didn't want me to deprive you of your ability to put me on ignore, you should have listened to my warning.

Olivier5 wrote:

your imbecility,

I remind you that my IQ is higher than you can count.

Olivier5 wrote:

and the lack of any interest on my side for the particular legal case

For someone who has such a supposed "lack of interest" you sure manage to come and keep posting at me about it.

Your first posts to me on A2K threatened to derail wandeljw's Syria thread with your efforts to relitigate our dispute (which I had thought we'd long since stopped arguing about). And now here you are on this thread.

At least here you'll be on topic. Maybe whatever issues you still have with me on this issue, you can get it out of your system so you can go back to posting somewhat civilly?

Olivier5 wrote:

another reason to ignore you is that you keep repeating yourself. Is that a mark of dementia or something? In any case it is very boring.

It's called "telling the truth".

The truth does not change from post to post, believe it or not.

Olivier5 wrote:

How many times can you repeat "childish name-calling" in the same paragraph?

Well, when the subject turns to your childish name-calling....

Olivier5 wrote:

Another reason to avoid you, and let that be a warning for all, is that your serial killer tendencies may one day get acted upon. A sociopath like you,

Now that is just as outrageous as when izzythepush falsely accuses me of his worst tendencies.

The only sociopath here is YOU.

Olivier5 wrote:

devoid of empathy,

And again. It is quite egregious for a monster who supports sending innocent people to prison to accuse me of lacking empathy.

Olivier5 wrote:

harboring tortuous sexual and murderous fantasies,

Liar.

Olivier5 wrote:

troll

Liar.

Olivier5 wrote:

But in the end, is the cheap kick you get out of it worth the multiple damages done to this board moral environment,

The only damage to the board's moral environment comes from you thugs cheering on atrocities against innocent people.

Don't blame me for the impact of your evilness.

Olivier5 wrote:

Usato

You know, I bet it would be pretty funny if someone dug up Meredith's corpse, photographed it, and posted the pictures all over the internet so the Kercher scum could not help but be exposed to what the current state of her corpse is.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

oralloy wrote:
Did you forget that it's me who has you on ignore

That's obviously a lie, or you wouldn't be writing to izzy...

Wrong. I have a long-standing (and very well publicized) policy of making an exception to ignore on all Amanda Knox threads.

If there is a particularly appalling lie about Amanda or Raffaele, I don't want to miss debunking it just because I have the freak who posted it on ignore.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

There was almost nothing accurate about your above depiction of events.

"Almost", huh? LOL...

Quote:

I generated a new ID for every single post.

Frankly I stopped counting. Fortunately, my mind could shut you up even if Yahoo couldn't.

By the way, Amanda says "Hello!"... Or rather, she says something like "mwellow" 'cause she's got a big, hard piece of French flesh in her mouth at the moment.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

And therefore you're NOT ignoring izzy. You're just pretending...

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

oralloy wrote:
There was almost nothing accurate about your above depiction of events.

"Almost", huh? LOL...

Correct.

Olivier5 wrote:

oralloy wrote:
I generated a new ID for every single post.

Frankly I stopped counting. Fortunately, my mind could shut you up even if Yahoo couldn't.

You were counting? Laughing

Olivier5 wrote:

By the way, Amanda says "Hello!"... Or rather, she says something like "mwellow" 'cause she's got a big, hard piece of French flesh in her mouth at the moment.

You wish. You forget that it was Meredith who was on a one-woman quest to "do" every degenerate bum on the streets of Europe. Just because Amanda and Meredith were flatmates doesn't mean that Amanda was a classless whore like Meredith.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

And therefore you're NOT ignoring izzy. You're just pretending...

Nope. He is very much on ignore. I will not see a single thing he posts outside an Amanda Knox thread unless someone bothers to quote it.

(I actually don't like the idea of ignore, but certain freaks are just so lowbrow that if you respond to them it demeans A2K, so I put them on ignore for the good of the site.)

1 Reply

@oralloy,

I don't give myself to classless whores... which is why I'm done with you now. Smile

0 Replies

@oralloy,

I really appreciate the irony of being called a freak by an inbred hillbilly, with a penchant for porcine orientated zoophilia, who can't have broadband because he thinks it's the work of Satan.

You are such an atavist, and regressing further every day.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

who can't have broadband because he thinks it's the work of Satan.

I can't have broadband because the flipping internet companies don't bother to offer it where I am. The moment it is offered here, I'm going to be the first to sign up.

(The rest of your lies were silly.)

0 Replies

@ossobuco,

Quote:

@ossobuco,
By the way, if I die, look him up.

My fellow poster, Ossobuco, your humorous statement is well received, at least by me. BTW, I find you one of the least offensive posters on this a2k site. There is something uniquely goodnatured about you, your attempt to understand those who appear incapable of sound judgment.

Quote:

I'm probably kidding.

Many a truth is spoken in jest; however, I understand where you're coming from. Wink

Frankly, the poster in question is probably only a danger to himself...From years of reading Oralloy's posts on Yahoo message boards, I believe this is the poster's natural way of striking back at those who do not see things the way he does.

One thing most observant people might realize is that Oralloy is accusing us of "sending innocent people to prison." How can this be so?! We were not eyewitnesses to said murder. We certainly did not serve on the jury....and many of us were on different continents!....Our voicing our personal opinion in no way had an effect on whether Amanda Knox went to prison or not. So why would Oralloy set himself this arduous repetitive task of saying over and over and over that I, you, and others are "sending innocent people to prison"? It's most transparent the poster is unable to distinguish the difference, the contrast between "opinion" (thinking one is guilty) and serving on the jury where there is POWER to send Amanda to prison. The jurors on these Amanda trials are the ones he should attack....if he must....not anonymous posters on the web.

Most of us realize by now that Oralloy has a challenging problem communicating on this forum(s) and most understanding people like you are trying to be more patient, understanding and tolerant, even though one feels like shooting the messenger and putting him out of his misery; realizing the poster feels besieged and is striking out the only way he understands....Oralloy simply does not know any other way.

I refuse to take advantage of one who is a troubled soul because in reality, Oralloy is his worse enemy.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Quote:

He fantasises about killing babies, and who knows what else

Personally, I'm unable to say factually what he fantasizes about because I'm not inside his mind.

izzythepush wrote;

Quote:

His limited vocabulary and love of guns shows a very primitive creature.

His vocabulary seems fine...quite extensive in fact as I've known him nearly 10 years or more....it's just that in his rage over Amanda one is blindfolded to any talents he might possess. His love fetish of guns reveal a deeper emotional problem, one that would require the services of a fully-fledged psychiatrist as I don't for one moment believe Oralloy to be like the rest of us....he is indeed *different.*

Quote:

I feel sorry for his neighbours, especially those with children, because he is a danger to those around him. He needs to be incarcerated in a secure mental facility before he starts to act out his sick fantasies.

I don't really understand the "pecularities" of Oralloy, but I suspect all his inner anger is directed exclusively via the Internet. I'll be willing to bet if we were to meet Oralloy face-to-face, we would find a most timid soul and nothing of the abnormality we witness of this poster every day. The computer might offer a form of escapism for him, allowing him to vent even those to whom he strikes at, seemingly are horrified.

1 Reply

@Moment-in-Time,

Moment-in-Time wrote:

Frankly, the poster in question is probably only a danger to himself...

I'm a danger only to people who wish to spout evil and hatred, and who can't handle having their atrocities being challenged by one of the good guys.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

From years of reading Oralloy's posts on Yahoo message boards, I believe this is the poster's natural way of striking back at those who do not see things the way he does.

???

Striking back?

Because I defend the innocent and condemn atrocities against them?

You don't make a lot of sense here.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

One thing most observant people might realize is that Oralloy is accusing us of "sending innocent people to prison." How can this be so?! We were not eyewitnesses to said murder. We certainly did not serve on the jury....and many of us were on different continents!....Our voicing our personal opinion in no way had an effect on whether Amanda Knox went to prison or not. So why would Oralloy set himself this arduous repetitive task of saying over and over and over that I, you, and others are "sending innocent people to prison"? It's most transparent the poster is unable to distinguish the difference, the contrast between "opinion" (thinking one is guilty) and serving on the jury where there is POWER to send Amanda to prison.

Nonsense!

The accusation is that you SUPPORT sending innocent people to prison.

And since you've protested that accusation for years, you know very well that is what the accusation is.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

The jurors on these Amanda trials are the ones he should attack....if he must....not anonymous posters on the web.

I still remember the horrified whining on Yahoo when I posted the names and personal information of all the jurors. Mr. Green

That said, Italy is mostly a tribunal system, so it is the judges who bear primary blame (and not only the judges in the show trial: also the judges responsible for the illegal decision to hold Amanda and Raffaele in prison during the trial process).

But this does not absolve "anonymous posters on the web" for their support of what those judges did.

And frequently "anonymous posters on the web" will take it upon themselves to spout outrageous lies about Amanda. In that case, those anonymous web posters deserve the primary blame for what they've written.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

Most of us realize by now that Oralloy has a challenging problem communicating on this forum(s)

???

I think I've been very clear in my denunciations.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

and most understanding people like you are trying to be more patient, understanding and tolerant, even though one feels like shooting the messenger and putting him out of his misery;

You guys have posted cruelty after cruelty. You aren't seriously going to pretend that any of you have any interest in tolerance or understanding?

Moment-in-Time wrote:

realizing the poster feels besieged and is striking out the only way he understands....Oralloy simply does not know any other way.

Well, it is certainly true that you guys are nothing but a lynch mob trying to besiege innocent people. And it is certainly true that I would never be capable of doing anything other than standing in your path and defending the innocent from your attacks.

But your characterization of me as lashing out is a bit inaccurate. Every blow I strike is directly in defense of the innocent. I'm not exactly lashing out.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

I refuse to take advantage of one who is a troubled soul because in reality, Oralloy is his worse enemy.

My soul couldn't be less troubled. I'm proud of what I've done here.

For my posts here in this thread, I count myself alongside the people who helped to shelter Jewish families from the Nazis, and the people who stood up against the KKK and helped to force desegregation on the South.

Can you imagine the horror that this thread would be if these monsters had posted all their hate and no one had bothered to speak out against them?

0 Replies

@Moment-in-Time,

Moment-in-Time wrote:

His love fetish of guns reveal a deeper emotional problem, one that would require the services of a fully-fledged psychiatrist

Belief in freedom is not a fetish, and is not a sign of any emotional problem.

Moment-in-Time wrote:

I don't really understand the "pecularities" of Oralloy, but I suspect all his inner anger is directed exclusively via the Internet. I'll be willing to bet if we were to meet Oralloy face-to-face, we would find a most timid soul and nothing of the abnormality we witness of this poster every day.

Well since it is only online that I come across people supporting atrocities, that is the only venue I am using to condemn those atrocities.

But I will always do the right thing in the real world as well. I don't just play a moral and ethical person online. I'm also a moral and ethical person away from the internet.

1 Reply

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know