@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:I'm not passive aggressive, I don't buy much of what anyone says in all this. At the same time, I'm in no place to know.
The problem is, there is VERY CLEAR EVIDENCE that Amanda and Raffaele are completely innocent in all respects. And this has been true from the very beginning of the case.
Your refusal to address this evidence, when combined with your continued posture that "the truth is unknown", amounts to a denial of the truth, and it does an injustice to the victims of this horrible crime.
I can see starting with a "the truth is unknown" posture when you first hear of the case and have yet to learn. But the normal thing is to then learn, and to listen when people point out facts and evidence to you.
What you are doing is refusing to listen when people present you with overwhelming evidence, all while continuing to say "the truth is unknown".
ossobuco wrote:Sorry you don't like this.
Well, you aren't nearly as bad as the others. But still, this attitude of "the truth is unknown" is causing harm to innocent people, because the truth
is in fact known.
ossobuco wrote:On Amanda quotes, I'm sure they are available if you look.
Amanda has a history of having been completely truthful aside from the interrogation where the Italians were beating false statements out of everyone (which she is hardly to blame for), so I'm sure that any quotes you have of hers are completely truthful.
That said, instead of listening to quotes (no matter who from), what about looking at
the evidence?