@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:It is often said, "Live by the sword, die by the sword" (re inflammatory statements that divert threads.)
... but, OTOH, your particular brand of vitriolic attacks and thread diversion are morally acceptable.
When I condemn evil people who are inflicting cruelty on the innocent, that is not in any way a diversion.
But yes. When I defend innocent people from cruel attacks, that is indeed morally acceptable.
Ragman wrote:And you pull the plug on the diversion when and as you see fit? I'm just sayin' - trying to understand the rules.
It was inappropriate of you to try to make the thread "about me" right in the moments before the verdict was read.
However, I am now willing to discuss and defend my behavior if you are still interested.
Ragman wrote:oralloy wrote:I suspect you are not able to understand right vs wrong
So..let's see...how can you question legitimately whether or not I understand right from wrong when I've made no statement that could indicate otherwise?
You
did make a statement that indicated otherwise.
You waded through tons of malevolent and cruel posts dedicated to inflicting pain on the innocent, without having a single objection to any of them.
But the moment you see me defending the innocent and fighting back against the cruelty, suddenly you object.
Back when I originally made my post, that seemed a strong indicator of a complete inability to understand right from wrong.
It still seems that way today.