20
   

Amanda Knox

 
 
Ragman
 
  2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:16 pm
@oralloy,
So let me understand something: what you think as ethical and moral is viciously attacking others here calling them evil and wishing torture on them....when they simply disagree with you?

So justice, morality and ethics have rules consisting of whatever you make them up to be in your head?
wandeljw
 
  1  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:18 pm
This thread was started by ossobuco and could have been interesting. There was no reason for oralloy to be inflammatory.

The verdict on the appeal will be made public in about two hours.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:20 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Your sense of ethics and justice seems to be ... well, low, to say it mildly.


Yes, but you have no sense of ethics or justice, and therefore are in no position to be making such a judgement.

You also are still making posts about me, when today should really be about freedom for Amanda and Raffaele.

Here is a cut-n-paste of an earlier post, in case it didn't sink in the first time:

Today should be about Amanda and Raffaele going free.

We can talk about my much-justified anger tomorrow.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:33 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:
So let me understand something: what you think as ethical and moral is viciously attacking others here calling them evil and wishing torture on them....when they simply disagree with you?


Vermin who support sending innocent people to prison are not merely "disagreeing with me".



Ragman wrote:
So justice, morality and ethics have rules consisting of whatever you make them up to be in your head?


I suspect you are not able to understand right vs wrong.

However, I am also not very willing to let you or others derail the thread by making it about me instead of about Amanda and Raffaele.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:34 pm
@wandeljw,
wandeljw wrote:
This thread was started by ossobuco and could have been interesting. There was no reason for oralloy to be inflammatory.


Your characterization is wildly inaccurate.

If anyone prevented the thread from being interesting, it was ossobuco, with her dishonest efforts to derail any discussion of the evidence.

And there was plenty of reason to be inflammatory. I was confronted by a bunch of thugs who had (and still have) little interest in facts or discussion.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  4  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:36 pm
I sure hope the **** they throw out the guilty bitches appeal. Mainly so I can type HAHAHAHA for Oralloy to read. Tee hee.

Ragman
 
  1  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:41 pm
@oralloy,
It is often said, "Live by the sword, die by the sword" (re inflammatory statements that divert threads.)

... but, OTOH, your particular brand of vitriolic attacks and thread diversion are morally acceptable. And you pull the plug on the diversion when and as you see fit? I'm just sayin' - trying to understand the rules.

Quote:
I suspect you are not able to understand right vs wrong

So..let's see...how can you question legitimately whether or not I understand right from wrong when I've made no statement that could indicate otherwise?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:45 pm
@contrex,
contrex wrote:
I sure hope the **** they throw out the guilty bitches appeal. Mainly so I can type HAHAHAHA for Oralloy to read. Tee hee.


And instead of everyone complaining about my replying to the vermin with exactly the right degree of hostility, how about complaining about the vermin itself (for example, the post I'm responding to).

Hypocrisy much?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:47 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:
... but, OTOH, your particular brand of vitriolic attacks and thread diversion are morally acceptable.


Error one: Subject about me when it should be about Amanda and Raffaele.

Error two: Subject is premised on fiction.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:48 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

However, I am also not very willing to let you or others derail the thread by making it about me instead of about Amanda and Raffaele.


Who are you to tell anybody here such? You are a normal A2K-member as far as I know. And certainly not the creator of this thread.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 12:58 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
oralloy wrote:
However, I am also not very willing to let you or others derail the thread by making it about me instead of about Amanda and Raffaele.


Who are you to tell anybody here such? You are a normal A2K-member as far as I know. And certainly not the creator of this thread.


Who I am is someone who will refuse to cooperate with any attempts to make the thread about me.

If you want to discuss me on some other day, fine. Today I'll not be engaging in any more discussions about me.

Note the verdict time may be pushed back to 9:45 Italy time; 3:45 eastern time.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:03 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Note the verdict time may be pushed back to 9:45 Italy time; 3:45 eastern time.


Your Italian seems to be a bit rusty: "La sentenza della Corte di Appello per il processo ad Amanda Knox e Raffaele Sollecito imputati della morte di Meredith Kercher, slittera' di oltre un'ora, attorno alle 21,30."

21,30 = 09:30pm.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:06 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Note the verdict time may be pushed back to 9:45 Italy time; 3:45 eastern time.


Your Italian seems to be a bit rusty: "La sentenza della Corte di Appello per il processo ad Amanda Knox e Raffaele Sollecito imputati della morte di Meredith Kercher, slittera' di oltre un'ora, attorno alle 21,30."

21,30 = 09:30pm.


That's the time I gave on the previous page.

It has since been pushed back 15 minutes.
0 Replies
 
eurocelticyankee
 
  2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:29 pm
@oralloy,
Oralboy said

Quote:
If you want to discuss me on some other day, fine. Today I'll not be engaging in any more discussions about me.


But that's all you do, you make the thread all about you and your opinion
and anybody who remotely disagrees with you is wrong and evil.
You then proceed to abuse them and come out with outrageous statements
which are sickening to normal people.
What's it like to live in a world where you're never wrong?, your crazy world.
So stop fooling yourself with your self righteous statements about staying
focused on the subject of the thread because you're not fooling anybody else.
The thread is ruined as soon as you get on board and start telling everybody
else their all wrong and evil and you're the only one with any right to an opinion.
Silly boy, can you imagine having to sit at a table and discuss this subject
face to face with other people, just how long do think it would be before
you were asked to leave?


0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  3  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:38 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
As the thread starter, I ceased feeding Oralloy responses a long time ago.

I do still read the thread when anyone else posts; thank you all for keeping it going, all but Oralloy.



<Pouring myself some Vino Cheapo Collapso Rosso on ice while I await the verdict. Maybe I'll make some nice Brutto ma Buono cookies to go along with it.>
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:51 pm

innocent

finally

But they still stuck her with the slander of the bar owner.

I suppose that can be appealed though.
0 Replies
 
eurocelticyankee
 
  2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:55 pm
@ossobuco,
Quote:
Silly boy, can you imagine having to sit at a table and discuss this subject
face to face with other people, just how long do think it would be before
you were asked to leave?
Or kicked out on your ass more likely

Enjoy your Vino Cheapo Collapso Osso Razz
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 01:58 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:
I do still read the thread when anyone else posts; thank you all for keeping it going, all but Oralloy.


I note the fact that I've posted more facts and links to evidence in this thread than everyone else combined.

I also note the fact that ossobuco has done nothing but try to derail the discussion whenever it turned to facts and evidence.

In any case, it's a pretty good verdict. Hopefully they'll appeal and the scumbag bar owner won't see a dime.
eurocelticyankee
 
  2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 02:06 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
scumbag bar owner


Do you know this barman?. How is it you have formed an opinion the man is a scumbag?.

Stupid boy
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 3 Oct, 2011 02:28 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
eurocelticyankee wrote:
How is it you have formed an opinion the man is a scumbag?.


Because of the horrible way he has slandered Amanda in the media. And also his disgraceful attacks against her in court.

I really hope Amanda appeals that (from Seattle of course). Lumumba doesn't deserve a dime. And Amanda deserves a lot.



eurocelticyankee wrote:
Stupid boy


Point of information: My IQ is ten times higher than yours and ossobuco's combined.
 

Related Topics

Guilty murderer Amanda Knox - Question by contrex
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
The Trial that JUST WON'T END - Question by michellesings
Amanda Knox conviction thrown out - Discussion by gungasnake
Multinational Murder Mystery - Discussion by wandeljw
Who killed Meredith Kercher? - Discussion by DylanB
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Amanda Knox
  3. » Page 36
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 09:31:39