@Merry Andrew,
David wrote:I sincerely marvel at your stupidity, Andy,
in implying that men who 'd commit 4 murders of armed, uniformed police,
in front of everybody, will obay severe, discriminatory gun control laws.
HOW do u propose to convince quadruple murderers
of police to do that?? Will u explain THAT to me?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Merry Andrew wrote:I neither said nor meant to imply anything of the sort.
I am on record as being opposed to any more restrictive gun laws.
Even the ones that we have on the books can't be enforced.
That's a straw man you're fighting there, David.
U called ME out, by name, accusing me of being an idiot,
PRESUMABLY,
because of my libertarian support of the 2nd Amendment, as interpreted
by the USSC in
D.C. v. HELLER.
Merry Andrew wrote:My point was that these were four well-armed, well-trained (we must assume) professional peace officers who became victims in spite of the fact that they were well-armed. Your constant inane prattling about the necessity of going around armed was the point of addressing my post to you. Being armed certainly didn't help in this case, did it?
Your argument woud be valid
IF I had alleged that possession of guns will render
a person
IMMUNE from any subsequent injury, regardless of whether he is attentive or not.
My guns will not protect me while I sleep; after I awaken: that is another story.
I believe that everyone KNOWS that in a life-threatening emergency,
it is best to have emergency equipment (for instance, a life jacket on a ship),
but sometimes even people perish in the ocean while thay wear the life jacket,
but on ships n planes, thay
STILL tell u to put on a life jacket in such an emergency.
Next time thay say that, will u tell them to shut up and call them idiots, as u did with me?
Will u refuse to wear a seatbelt in a car, Andy,
because people get killed in collisions even
with seatbelts?
Merry Andrew wrote:
And if it didn't help save the lives of pros why do you keep insisting
that it is good self-defense for the average civilian with no urban combat training?
I do so because I know that
when propely used emergency equipment can rescue u (sometimes).
I have repeatedly posted here of how while driving at around
1 a.m., I was alone on the road, except for an old car
that was tailgating me for a while. My attention was directed
forward, deflected c.30 degrees to the right, as I drove slowly.
After a while, I heard a shot and a bullethole opened up
in my driver's door window. I then saw that the old car
was driving, holding exactly abreast of mine, until I withdrew
my 2 inch stainless steel mirror .44 revolver, whereupon
I heard a scream and the old car showed new life, departing apace.
I did not even have time to line up a shot.
The mere visible display of defensive firepower ended the emergency.
According to Andy, I shoud now be unarmed because of
what happened with this hit in the coffeeshop.
I don 't understand the reasoning of that.
NO SALE, Andy.
I refuse to pay for other people's mistakes.
David