@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
Limbaugh also suggested that racism itself was acceptable.
“If homosexuality being inborn is what makes it acceptable, why does racism being inborn not make racism acceptable?” the talk show host asked. “I’m sorry " I mean, this is the way my mind works. But apparently now we don’t choose racism, we just are racists. We are born that way. We don’t choose it. So shouldn’t it be acceptable, excuse " this is according to the way the left thinks about things.”
To answer the above point, I believe the statement, "If homosexuality being inborn is what makes it acceptable," is a red-herring. Homosexuality being supposedly inborn, I believe, is not what makes it acceptable. What I believe makes it acceptable is that homosexuality is not based on a dominant gene, as we know genetics today. In effect, if one's daughter married a homosexual, one can have heterosexual grandchildren, even if conception was with the help of a laboratory. However, if one's (White) daughter married a Black man, one's grandchildren will not be White. And, most parents, Black or White, would like to think that their eventual grandchildren will be carrying on the lineage that they themselves came from.
So, in this context racism is not an evil (for the above example), I believe, it is just how we as humans want to believe our only chance at immortality, through granchildren, will transpire.
The problem is that the word racism has many dimensions. Plus, we should also remember that when many White soldiers joined to fight the Confederacy, it was not to end slavery. It was to make sure that the western territories would be admitted to the Union as non-slave states, so specifically, the western states could be sans plantations, and therefore White males could find employment. So, racism seems to have a component of the realization, that as big as this country is, we are all competing AGAINST other groups, based on where one is located. A less inflammatory word might be raciocentric. Perhaps, we are. We are also ethnocentric, as I can testify to. So, should we admit that the King might be naked, in the way of allegory, and many are raciocentric, as part of the way we have been socialized in society. Can we put the onus on society's socialization, and stop blaming individuals that had no control of their own socialization?