@JTT,
Quote:I can't answer this question, because I think its premise is wrong. I disagree that prescriptive linguists are, ipso facto, peddling myths.
I suppose it's possible that you can't, Thomas, but that would be mostly because you're not willing to try. In fact, forgive me, you seem afraid to try. I've never seen you - a highly intelligent fella - exit a discussion faster than the one on language.
Your "disagreement" is no more credible than what you pointed up as Ebrown's "failings"; "You are not entitled to a historic reality that makes you happy; none of us is".
I'm sure all of us have it in one respect or another, but it puzzles me why you seem so bent on believing a series of falsehoods.