@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:
Quote:My teenage sons and their friends refer to each other as "niggers".
(I don't believe white kids in their social circles would use the term.)
I 'm reminded of a (strange?) experience of mine in the 1990s.
There were about 6 male blacks aged around 20 in an elevator,
of whom one was highly and vocally enraged toward another one, not present.
The angry one raged on and on in his complaints,
addressing the others, and repeatedly referring to the object
of his ire by the word that is the subject matter of this thread.
He raised his voice in emphasis every time he attributed this
racial description to the perpetrator of his discontent (whose race he shared).
His denunciations were the only voice in the elevator.
ebrown p wrote:
Quote:The term is used as a typical teen irreverent and defiant social ritual.
I don't know if this is healthy or not; teen rituals have their own strange logic.
On one sense, casual use of a historically painful word probably diminishes its effect.
Forbidden words are endowed with a sense of mysticism and power.
As a parent, I do not focus on words. I want my kids to be decent compassionate people.
You do this by understanding other people's feeling and thinking about what you say.
You don't do this by banning words.
I think explaining why a word is hurtful to other people is a good idea.
That sounds reasonable.
My own vu, of explaining the applicable history
has already been posted by others.
I need not be redundant.
There are at least 2 "B words";
one can be explained as pertaining to dogs
and their sons who, presumably r also dogs.
The other concerns wedlock or its absence.
It seems
odd that
cruelty is ofen ascribed to people
who 've been born of parents "without benefit of clergy."