@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:do stop with the dumbassery.
I do not share the opinion that facts and logic are dumbassery.
MontereyJack wrote:it's the gun not the grip. since you persistently mistake the part for the whole,
Your word games are silly. Banning a gun whenever it has a pistol grip on it, is banning pistol grips on that gun.
MontereyJack wrote:I don't think anyone in the world takes your arguments serously.
"Appeal to the crowd" is a logical fallacy.
MontereyJack wrote:And I did read2A closely, and it's obvious that SCOTUS blew it badly in Heller, with its ludicrous conservative wild-eyes.
I doubt that you really want to go there.
They did in fact get Heller wrong. The Second Amendment actually says that we have the right to have
grenades, bazookas, and full-auto weapons.
Do let me know when you are ready to let the entire nation have access to
true machine guns.
MontereyJack wrote:Someoen iss just as dead run thru with a pike as they are shot with an ar-15, sl a pike is all we need and all 2A would actually require,
Under Heller we have the right to enough firepower for effective self defense.
Under the Second Amendment we have the right to have weapons that are appropriate for repelling a foreign invasion.
Either way, a pike is not a sufficient weapon.
MontereyJack wrote:I'm right, you're wrong. What a surprise <cynical>.
The Second Amendment says otherwise.