Guns: how much longer will it take ....

See?

Of course you don't.

I see that you are lying about me to cover up your failure.

If you had honor and integrity you would not do that.

Not at all. When a person can't be convinced of anything - that is where things stop - they can't be convinced of anything. This is not a failure on other peoples part, for no-one else is responsible for how an individual's mind works, just the individual themself.

You are lying about me being unable to be convinced. People who use facts and logic are easily able to convince me.

Your failure to ever use facts or logic is indeed your failure, and it is your failure alone.

Dude, you were just shown in another thread where your definition of lynching was wrong, and still denied being wrong. If multiple dictionaries can't convince you of an error of yours - absolutely nothing and no-one can.

It's the same pattern running through all your posts - no-one can convince you of anything, once you've made your mind up.

No I wasn't.



I'm not wrong.



Your logic sucks. My disagreement with limited specific sources is NOT evidence that no source can convince me.

And, aside from the above catastrophic logic failure, there is the small fact that some of your definitions agreed with me.



No offense, but you are not qualified to draw conclusions.

Exhibit A

It sucks for you that you're wrong and I'm right, but there is no harm in my acknowledgement of reality.

Exhibit B

I often wonder if Ollie isn't Trump in drag.

Umm...wow...I can almost picture that...fluffed up hair and all

The exhibits all show that you don't have the integrity to admit that you are wrong.

tell another whopper, why don't you.

The only liars here are you and vikorr.

It is really dishonorable of you to falsely accuse me of your own dishonesty and lack of integrity.

POT AND KETTLE.

Nope. I'm not a phony like you and vikorr.

I can back up all of my claims, and I have always done so when cites have been requested of me.

Hardly. When pressed for evidence you tend to wimp out and claim your posts were merely your opinnions, and opnions are neither true nor false, but just opinons, which pretty much vitiates yaur whole argument. You've spent years trying to force your opiniobs down our throats as facts, which they are not; they have no valdity beyond your own skull.

While this appears to be you projecting - I don't think anyone here actually thinks you're phony - you are quite consistent. Most just think you're deluded in many areas of your thinking. There's a definate difference between deluded (which can be a reason you fool yourself) and phony. I personally think the wiring is the main issue. Largely normal, with some odd wires that affect many areas. It the right setting, you'd probably be largely normal (gun toting, trump singing, white lord type settings, but hey)

You're lying. You cannot provide any examples of me ever failing to provide a cite for any of my facts.



When you ask for a cite for an opinion, it is appropriate to explain the difference between facts and opinions to you.

Explaining the difference between facts and opinions to you is hardly wimping out.



No. My arguments are just fine. You're afraid to even challenge them.

Instead you either lie about me or ask for a cite for an opinion. The one thing you will never do is address any of my factual arguments.



You're lying again. You cannot provide any examples of me ever trying to claim that my opinions are facts.

Note that when you ask for a cite for my opinions as if they were factual claims, that is not me confusing my opinions for factual claims. That is you confusing my opinions for factual claims.

It appears to be nothing of the sort. You have all of the traits that I accuse you of. I have none of them.



That's the trouble with you. You are not capable of drawing accurate conclusions about others (and especially not people who are vastly smarter than you are). Yet you keep trying to do it anyway.



Leave the thinking to those of us who can actually do it.