@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:It is pretty implicit. We need strong gun control.
I deny what "we" "need" but for the nonce,
for the sake of argument, if we were to assume what u claim:
be advised that I (for one)
absolutely refuse to relinquish
my natural right and my constitutional right to the means of effective self-defense.
In other words, altho I am confident that we will have less crime
if each citizen is defensively well armed,
even if u
actually convinced me that in the nation
as a whole,
there 'd be less crime with the victim disarmament
that results from discriminatory licensure of guns
I woud still
ADAMANTLY REFUSE to co-operate.
In other words, in that circumstance, I 'd say:
"let the public be damned! I will defend
MY individual rights to self-defense."
I 'd say that
each of the 300 000 000 + American citizens
shoud exalt his own
personal well being above the "common welfare."
Individual,
personal, defensive armament sets the tone of self-reliance
and of
contempt for
docile collectivism. That rejection is fundamentally American.
America is supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave
David