Guns: how much longer will it take ....

intolerance and ego, joints pot and kettle routine again.

How come you ain't never see no black or Arab men proudly carrying assault rifles in public to celebrate their open carry liberty? If white hillbilly redneck yokels can do it, everyone should have the same fun. Hey gays, let's get assault rifles, paint them rainbow colors, and stand outside some churches. It's apparently protected free speech.

That's true, She's rational.

Wrong again. Glitterbag is not capable of rationality. All she does is spout childish name-calling.

Coldjoint is highly rational however.

She was the dangerous thug. And he did protect himself from her by filming the encounter and virtualy smoking her arse. Niw she's jobless and I suspect more than a little lonely for a while. Should give her some time to think about her behaviour and her prejudice.

No but false testimony does.

He didn't have any right to threaten her for not having the dog on its leash.

She had every right to protect herself from him.



She didn't lie about anything at all. Everything that she said was the truth.



That is incorrect. He did threaten her.



That doesn't give you the right to attack people who break the rules.

If you attempt vigilante action against someone for committing a minor infraction, they have the right to defend themselves from you.



The fact that he was making threats made him pretty threatening.



She sounded like she wanted him to go away and stop menacing her.



It doesn't matter what his point was. He threatened her. She had the right to protect herself from him.



Her description of the situation was completely accurate. She was right to feel panic considering the way he was menacing her.



It doesn't matter why he was threatening her. She still had the right to protect herself from him.



He was the one who threatened her.



Not when they lose their jobs for doing so.

People who feel threatened by a minority are not going to want to involve the police when it will result in the loss of their job. They are going to take care of the problem themselves.

And when some innocent person ends up being killed because someone perceives them as a threat, that's going to be your fault.



I would think that you'd find that situation preferable to her gunning the guy down in self defense.

But by making it impossible for people to call the police, you don't leave them any other option.



He would have likely have gotten a stern lecture about how dumb it is to threaten women in secluded areas.



There was nothing false in her report.



People do not deserve to lose their job for calling the police when they have been threatened.



She was protecting herself from the thug who was menacing her.



She called the police on him for threatening her.



There is nothing whatsoever wrong about her protecting herself from a dangerous thug.



Sure there is. He threatened her. She has the right to protect herself.



I won't blame anyone who shoots perceived threats instead of calling the police.

It is reasonable for people to not want to lose their job.



If people don't want to get into trouble, they shouldn't threaten women in secluded areas.



You've done more harm to the world than she has.

Misperceived threats are likely to be killed now because you've made people afraid to call the police when they feel threatened.

Here's one for our resident racist oralloy/yellow cake...



Enjoy!

Not the self defense. your posts,

All my posts do is point out that people have the right to defend themselves.

@justaguy2,
You engage in childish name-calling because you aren't capable of saying anything intelligent.