Guns: how much longer will it take ....

@oralloy,

blahblahblah.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

blahblahblah. the ONLY thing he was trying to do was get her dog restrained. Which she unlawfully refused tok do, which clearly she was not going to like. She was wrong. He was right.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Wrong again. That thug attacked her pet and she should have shot him in self defense and then walked away.

I hear that there have been some people killed in these protests. Likely it was people eliminating possible threats and then walking away.

And rightfully so. People have the right to protect themselves from dangerous thugs.

0 Replies

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

Conservstive bullshit is what it is.

Progressives really hate facts and reality, but no. Facts and reality are not BS.

MontereyJack wrote:

Racist conservative bullshit as well.

Falsely accusing everyone of racism really makes you look silly.

I know it's a crutch for progressives since they have no facts or logic, but it's still silly.

MontereyJack wrote:

Amy broke the law and refused to follow the law.

Be serious. She let her dog off the leash. Since when is that a capital offense?

MontereyJack wrote:

Chris's actions were totally consistent with what he asked under the law to happen and she refused, ,so he took action to restrain the dog himself. No evidence anything else there. No threat. She wasn't going to like his lawful attempt to restrain the dog . No threat on his part, simply a lawful attempt to restrain the dog when its owner wouldn't.

Wrong again. That thug told her that she was not going to like what he was about to do and then tried to lure her pet away from her.

The proper response was to shoot and kill him, not to call the police.

MontereyJack wrote:

Her unlawful reaction was to choke the dog, jerk it around and off its feet, quite possibly unlawful cruelty tok animals,

There is nothing illegal about trying to keep your pet away from someone who is trying to harm it.

Although as I said, the better option would be to shoot the thug who is trying to harm your pet.

MontereyJack wrote:

and to make racist inflammatory statements to the 911 or cops call she made,

There is nothing racist or inflammatory about calling the police when a thug tries to kill your pet.

MontereyJack wrote:

Amy was illegal, totally out of control, and society has shamed her for it.

And now everyone knows to not call the police when a minority threatens them. People need to start handling threats themselves and then make sure that no one can connect them to the body.

MontereyJack wrote:

And conservatives as usual upend reality and blame the black guy rether than the white perp.

The black guy was a thug who tried to kill her pet.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

The proper response was to shoot and kill him, not to call the police.

And you honestly wonder why your country is going to hell ?

Quote:

There is nothing illegal about trying to keep your pet away from someone who is trying to harm it.

And since when is asking someone to restrain their pet attempting to "harm" someone's pet ?? In that case, nearly, if not, every local government is "harming" people's pets...

Quote:

There is nothing racist or inflammatory about calling the police when a thug tries to kill your pet.

Again, how's asking someone to restrain their pet attempting to "harm" their pet ??

Quote:

And now everyone knows to not call the police when a minority threatens them. People need to start handling threats themselves and then make sure that no one can connect them to the body.

Again, and you wonder why your country is going to hell ? You're clearly a complete idiot, and it doesn't inspire much hope for your country with people like you living in it...

1 Reply

@justaguy2,

justaguy2 wrote:

And you honestly wonder why your country is going to hell ?

The nation is doing just fine. Just instruct the National Guard to smash the rioters.

justaguy2 wrote:

And since when is asking someone to restrain their pet attempting to "harm" someone's pet ?? In that case, nearly, if not, every local government is "harming" people's pets...

That is hardly an accurate description of the events.

This thug told her that she was not going to like what he was about to do, and then he tried to lure her pet away from her.

justaguy2 wrote:

Again, how's asking someone to restrain their pet attempting to "harm" their pet ??

Again, that is hardly an accurate description of the events.

This thug told her that she was not going to like what he was about to do, and then he tried to lure her pet away from her.

justaguy2 wrote:

You're clearly a complete idiot, and it doesn't inspire much hope for your country with people like you living in it...

I suppose the reason why you engage in childish name-calling is because you are incapable of composing an intelligent argument.

That's not really much of an excuse though.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

False. What he was trying to do was lawfully trying to put her pet on a leash, which she illegally refused to do, and he knew she was not going to like it because she refused pointblank to obey the law. You are as usual trying to hyperspin the narrative to blame the black guy and exonerate the white person for her misdeeds.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

The nation is doing just fine. Just instruct the National Guard to smash the rioters.

And I'm also the Pope too... LOL. The National Guard has already been called to restore order, they have also said they support people's right to protest. Which is a right under your countries very constitution ("right to assembly" is the phase you're looking for), I might add. That doesn't mean however that all protesters are also looting and burning down buildings - so don't lump everyone into the same basket if you have any clue about what's going on.

Quote:

That is hardly an accurate description of the events.

Really? Well funny that... as any reputable source says otherwise. And in fact, if it's the same woman (Amy Cooper) you're referring to described in the link below, then she was also fired from her job - so clearly her own employers think very differently...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52759502

In fact, she also later said the following when the s*it hit the fan...

Quote:

Ms Cooper later apologised, saying she had "overreacted". "I sincerely and humbly apologise to everyone, especially to that man, his family," she told NBC News.

Let me guess... the BBC is making s*it up ? Yeah right Rolling Eyes

Quote:

I suppose the reason why you engage in childish name-calling is because you are incapable of composing an intelligent argument.

That's not really much of an excuse though.

I maintain what I said. And you are very clearly lacking any intelligence of any kind whatsoever yourself. So clearly since it takes at least two to have an "intelligent argument", then clearly it's not much of an argument. Since for one, the very facts of the matter are very much at odds with your claims, and you're clearly a complete idiot who is _not_ in possession of the facts to begin with.

So what's your excuse then? Born that way, upbringing, something else?

2 Replies

@justaguy2,

You’re wasting your time. Oralloy is a far right gun nut who approves of racist murders and has fantasised about urinating on the bodies of dead children killed in school shootings.

He has a limited vocabulary and says the same pat phrases over and over again.

After about a page he just starts repeating himself and you end up having the same argument over and over again.

Btw, are you from the UK?

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

Yeah, kinda figured that, but some people need to be told that their views are clearly not in line with reality. And while there doesn't appear to be much hope for the very sad individual that we refer to ever getting in touch with something we call reality, at least others reading this thread can see that at least most of us haven't completely lost our minds.

I'm sure it's not only their vocabulary that is extremely limited, to say the least... Wink

No, I don't live in the UK, I live in Australia (but hoping to move somewhere else one day), but even in this nanny state at least people's minds are generally far more sound than the very sad chap that goes by the username of "oralloy". So I'd rather be here than the USA right now Wink

2 Replies

@justaguy2,

Are you capable of noticing the fact that you cannot point out any untrue statements in my posts?

Actually what others can see is how horrible you are for participating in the lynching of an innocent person.

They can also see your inability to make an intelligent argument, and your reliance on childish name-calling.

0 Replies

@justaguy2,

There’s lots of other Aussies here, you might want to check out the Australia thread.

I’m from the UK, there’s not a lot of us on A2K right now.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

False. What he was trying to do was lawfully trying to put her pet on a leash, which she illegally refused to do, and he knew she was not going to like it because she refused pointblank to obey the law. You are as usual trying to hyperspin the narrative to blame the black guy and exonerate the white person for her misdeeds.

Wrong again. That thug told her that she was not going to like what he was about to do, and then he tried to lure her pet away from her.

0 Replies

@justaguy2,

justaguy2 wrote:

The National Guard has already been called to restore order,

Now all they need to do is use the appropriate firepower to eliminate the rioters.

justaguy2 wrote:

Really?

Yes.

justaguy2 wrote:

Well funny that... as any reputable source says otherwise.

Your sources aren't nearly as reputable as you think they are if they are spouting lies like that.

justaguy2 wrote:

And in fact, if it's the same woman (Amy Cooper) you're referring to described in the link below, then she was also fired from her job - so clearly her own employers think very differently...

She made a horrible mistake by calling the police for help.

The proper course of action was to kill the guy and then slip away unnoticed before the police arrived. Her life would not have been destroyed had she done that.

justaguy2 wrote:

In fact, she also later said the following when the s*it hit the fan...

Quote:
Ms Cooper later apologised, saying she had "overreacted". "I sincerely and humbly apologise to everyone, especially to that man, his family," she told NBC News.

That your lynch mob bullied your victim into apologizing for what you falsely accuse her of is nothing for you to be proud of.

Again this is more evidence that what people should do when faced with a possible threat from a minority is NOT call the police for help.

The proper course of action is what is commonly known as: Shoot, Shovel, Shut-up.

justaguy2 wrote:

Let me guess... the BBC is making s*it up ? Yeah right

The BBC has an ugly history of lying. But in this case I believe they accurately described what your lynch mob bullied your victim into saying.

justaguy2 wrote:

I maintain what I said.

That's because you aren't capable of anything other than childish name-calling.

justaguy2 wrote:

And you are very clearly lacking any intelligence of any kind whatsoever yourself.

Actually my IQ is 170.

justaguy2 wrote:

Since for one, the very facts of the matter are very much at odds with your claims,

Wrong again. The facts agree with everything that I said.

justaguy2 wrote:

and you're clearly a complete idiot

You engage in childish name-calling because you are not capable of making an intelligent argument.

justaguy2 wrote:

who is _not_ in possession of the facts to begin with.

Wrong again. I am in full possession of all the facts.

justaguy2 wrote:

So what's your excuse then?

I don't need an excuse. I'm not the one who is unable to produce an intelligent argument.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Oralloy is a far right gun nut who approves of racist murders

Protecting yourself from a threat is neither racist nor murder.

People have the right to be safe from threats.

izzythepush wrote:

and has fantasised about urinating on the bodies of dead children killed in school shootings.

That's a lie.

izzythepush wrote:

He has a limited vocabulary

That's a lie too.

izzythepush wrote:

and says the same pat phrases over and over again.
After about a page he just starts repeating himself and you end up having the same argument over and over again.

It is certainly the case that the truth does not change from post to post, and I do tell the truth.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

Now all they need to do is use the appropriate firepower to eliminate the rioters.

Boogaloo Bois and Three Percenter you mean, I suppose.

1 Reply

@Walter Hinteler,

You'll need to translate that into English before I can say for sure, but I suspect that it's not what I mean.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

You'll need to translate that into English before I can say for sure, but I suspect that it's not what I mean.

Don't blame me how rightwings name themselves!
Boogaloo bois - Three Percenters

1 Reply

@Walter Hinteler,

I am suggesting that the National Guard eliminate the people who are stealing stuff and burning down stores.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

I have been meaning to have a look at that thread, just been busy with other things like finally building my new desktop PC, then installing the OS, apps, configuring, compiling stuff, etc. So it's drained my time of late, but like with everything, I'll get around to it sooner or later. Wink

PS: If you wanted proof about oralloy, then it looks like he's delivered...

1 Reply

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know