Guns: how much longer will it take ....

You're lying again.

Did the SC get it wrong when it didn't even review the Sixth Circuit's finding that the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 1994 didn't negatively impact a fundamental right?

Specifically, progressive ideology is all about violating people's civil liberties for sadistic pleasure.

Progressives are bad people. That's why I support removing progressives from society and placing them in labor camps.

Here's a classic example of you peddling your opinion as though it were fact.



A classic fascist move.

I did not claim that anything in that line is a fact.

Here is an example of a fact: Progressives deliberately violate people's civil liberties, and for no reason other than their own sadistic pleasure.

Nuh-uh.

Nuh-uh.

Wrong again. If a law violates the equal protection clause, that doesn't mean that strict scrutiny begins applying to the law.

If a law violates the equal protection clause, that law is outright unconstitutional right then and there, merely for violating the equal protection clause.

So far you've not provided anything to support your claims about the motivation for New York's law. Neither have you provided anything to support that finding you referenced from that old court ruling.

that so-called "fact" is purely opinion, not fact, and anyone who believes it is loopy.

That is incorrect. It's all provable fact.

That progressives deliberately violate people's civil liberties can be seen by looking at the laws that they pass. New York's law that they were recently forced to abandon is a prime example of progressives deliberately violating people's civil liberties.

That their only reason for deliberately violating people's civil liberties is "sadistic pleasure" can be seen by the fact that no one can put forward any alternative motivation for deliberately violating people's civil liberties.

Your childishness stems from you inability to make an intelligent argument.

It was never looked at by the SC or any courts for that matter based on the actual 2nd Amendment, it was always other constitutional clauses they were fighting it through. So the point is, the SC will likely rule against the 9th again in this case because it has been proven that the law has a stifling effect on the ability of legal gun owners to purchase ammo. We already know the 9th will just about always rule in favor of the anti-gun crowd or against anything that has the whiff of not being liberal and leftist.

Says the guy who supports the death and murder of cops.

Gee Baldy, I thought you were the one who supported death by gun in any circumstances.

Is that suppose to be a cheap shot?

I know bobsal supported killing cops, he said so in the old BLM threads. He didn't think there was enough dead cops even though I was able to prove that cops were dying in record numbers not related to anything other than being killed by crooks. He wasn't that upset by the 5 cops killed in Dallas by the BLM anti-cop supporter.

Its a fact you have posted on more than one occusation. Especially in referancr to school children being gunned down.

Then it should be easy for you to produce such claims, let me know what you find.

The NRA and Fox News are constantly boasting about being deep state and how they run things.

It what other country could a group of armed paedophiles demand a tribute of dead children? That’s what these protests are all about, opening up the schools so the NRA can collect its tribute of dead children.

It’s like the story of George and the dragon. America desperately needs a modern day George to slay the NRA dragon so its children can be free.

Don't be silly. The NRA are not pedophiles and do not demand a tribute of dead children.

The US police and/or military (depending on the degree of the threat) will make short work of anyone who tries to harm the NRA.