57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 03:04 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Neither one of those responses is true.

Wrong again. The corpse thing is indeed my reaction to your silly virtue signaling.

You have indeed put "your desire to violate people's civil liberties for fun" far ahead of "measures that might possibly save lives".


MontereyJack wrote:
Your egregious virtue signaling

You cannot provide any examples of me ever engaging in virtue signaling.


MontereyJack wrote:
about wrapping yourself in phony civil liberties violations

There is nothing phony about it being a civil liberties violation when progressives impose gun restrictions that cannot be justified as serving a compelling government interest.


MontereyJack wrote:
while ignoring gun violence totally is noted.

You ignore gun violence just as much as I do. All you ever focus on is trying to violate people's civil liberties for fun.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 03:17 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Your attempts at reasoning are ludicrous.

Another claim an example could prove. How about an example of attempted reason?
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 05:19 am
@coldjoint,
Read his post just previous to yours. ?Every part of it is erroneous, biased opinion masquerading as fact.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 05:26 am
@MontereyJack,
Progressives don't like facts, but that doesn't mean that facts are opinions, nor does it mean that facts are not true.

There is nothing phony about it being a civil liberties violation when progressives impose gun restrictions that cannot be justified as serving a compelling government interest.

You do avoid measures that actually try to save lives, and focus solely on measures that would violate people's civil liberties for the sadistic pleasure of demented progressives.

And you cannot provide any examples of virtue signaling on my part.


http://patcrosscartoons.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/the-facts1.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 08:27 am
@oralloy,
Repeating your nonsense does not make it sense.
Glennn
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 08:37 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
No.

Why not?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 08:51 am
@MontereyJack,
If you think that facts and reality are nonsense and do not make sense, that is a reflection of your progressivism. There are no problems with facts and reality.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 01:41 pm
@oralloy,
Only your ability to interpret them properly.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 01:53 pm
@oralloy,
The problem lies in that what you think are facts are not facts at all.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 02:17 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
The problem lies in that what you think are facts are not facts at all.

Name one. Or tell us why you cannot.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 02:57 pm
@RABEL222,
There are no problems with my ability to interpret facts. The first step in interpreting facts is to accept that they exist. That's the step that always trips up progressives.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 15 Jan, 2020 02:58 pm
@MontereyJack,
Wrong. Facts are facts no matter how much progressives dislike reality.

http://patcrosscartoons.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/the-facts1.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 07:50 am
@oralloy,
Conservatives repeat the tenets of their demented ideology over and over and over again, s0 many times they become so familiar to them that they think they are facts. They aren't. They remain merely demented ideology and opinion, and that's all they will ever be. Reality does not enter into their thinking at all.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 07:56 am
@MontereyJack,
Your inability to provide any examples of inaccurate statements in our posts shows otherwise.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 08:16 am
@oralloy,
Your years of ignoring the fact that your posts have repeatedly been wrong and purely opinion, no fact, indicates the truth of what I say.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 08:18 am
@MontereyJack,
Did you notice that you failed to provide any examples of me being wrong about anything?

I noticed. Laughing Laughing Laughing
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 08:29 am
Whiny brats sometimes have whiny parents.
https://apnews.com/6374fef7961de22f985d02924a8f95c3
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 08:32 am
Historical milestone: First attempted abuse of a red flag law.
https://apnews.com/32b767d2053059d490864033afb27eaf
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 08:42 am
@oralloy,
Did you fail to notice that you yhave been shown to be wrong many timesover the years?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2020 09:05 am
@MontereyJack,
I noticed your failure to provide any examples of someone demonstrating that I am wrong about something.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 01:25:40