57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

 
 
Glennn
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 12:28 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
No matter how often you repeat your nonsense about pistol grips it remains nonsense.

That's what we tell people who repeat their nonsense about pistol-grips making a rifle especially dangerous, and using that nonsense as justification for banning a non select-fire rifle.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 12:36 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
No matter how often you repeat your nonsense about pistol grips it remains nonsense. One would think after five years or so pushing it you would realize it.

Wrong. Facts are not nonsense.

No matter how much progressives hate facts, facts will never be nonsense.

It is a fact that progressive attempts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles have nothing to do with trying to save lives.

It is a fact that you cannot provide any alternative motivation for outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto rifles other than the sadistic joy that progressives get from violating people's civil liberties.


http://patcrosscartoons.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/the-facts1.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 12:57 pm
@oralloy,
Those aren't facts. They're stupid ubervooservative opinion nothing more.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:00 pm
@MontereyJack,
Wrong.

It is a fact that progressive efforts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles have nothing to do with trying to save any lives.

It is a fact that you cannot provide any alternative motivation for outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto rifles other than progressive sadistic joy over violating people's civil liberties.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:20 pm
@oralloy,
Wrong. Opinion. Anwd opinion with a bad fit to reality.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:22 pm
@Glennn,
No.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:25 pm
@coldjoint,
Follow NZ is what.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:39 pm
@MontereyJack,
The Constitution says no. And the NRA enforces the Constitution.

Not to mention the fact that you yourself will sabotage any attempt to follow New Zealand by making everything about pistol grips.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:40 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Wrong. Opinion. Anwd opinion with a bad fit to reality.

Nope. Facts are not opinions. And the idea that facts do not fit reality is outright delusional.

It is a fact that progressive efforts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles have nothing to do with trying to save lives.

It is a fact that you cannot provide any alternative motivation for outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto rifles other than progressives thinking that it is fun to violate people's civil liberties.


https://patcrosscartoons.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/the-facts1.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 01:58 pm
@oralloy,
Wrong. The attempt has always been to outlaw weapons not grips. And the motive has always been to save lives. Since you have no respect for life you've always tried to deflect as you are now. You mistake your illusions for facts.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:02 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Since you have no respect for life you've always tried to deflect as you are now.

If he had no respect for life he would not want civil rights for people (people being alive). Somethings make life more livable.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:15 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Wrong. The attempt has always been to outlaw weapons not grips.

"Outlawing a rifle whenever it has pistol grips on it" is exactly the same thing as "outlawing pistol grips on that rifle."


MontereyJack wrote:
And the motive has always been to save lives.

Don't be silly. How is outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto rifles an attempt to save lives?


MontereyJack wrote:
Since you have no respect for life

You're the person who thinks that it is more important to violate people's civil liberties for fun than it is to save lives.


MontereyJack wrote:
you've always tried to deflect as you are now.

Challenging your claims head-on is not even remotely deflection.


MontereyJack wrote:
You mistake your illusions for facts.

I don't have any illusions.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:26 pm
@coldjoint,
False. He wants to piss on the corpses of innocent victims of gun violence. That is his only reaction to their deaths. That is In no way respect for life. You have no respect for the vast majority of muslims who aren't jihadis or for that matter anyone whose sexual orientation or politics or religion differs from yours either for that matter, he anybody who didn't stop thinking about 1950. And yes I know that's probably about the time you were born.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:27 pm
@oralloy,
All of those are nonsense
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:30 pm
@MontereyJack,
Progressives really hate facts, but no. Facts are not nonsense.

"Outlawing a rifle whenever it has pistol grips on it" is exactly the same thing as "outlawing pistol grips on that rifle."

"Asking you to explain your claim" isn't nonsense. That's a standard reaction when people make preposterous claims. And it's pretty telling that you dodged the question.

You have in fact made "measures that might save lives" secondary to "your desire to outlaw pistol grips for no reason".

The idea that you would say that "challenging your claims head-on is not even remotely deflection" is nonsense shows that you really have no conception of reality.

And your inability to point out anything that I am wrong about is pretty strong evidence that I have no illusions.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:38 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
You have no respect for the vast majority of muslims who aren't jihadis

Every Muslim is a jihadist according to the Koran. I have always said Muslims do not define Islam. Islam defines them. I have no respect for Islam.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:39 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
False. He wants to piss on the corpses of innocent victims of gun violence. That is his only reaction to their deaths.

No. That is my reaction to your silly virtue signalling.


MontereyJack wrote:
That is In no way respect for life.

You're the one who thinks that violating people's civil liberties for fun is more important than trying to save lives.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:56 pm
@oralloy,
Neither one of those responses is true. Your egregious virtue signaling about wrapping yourself in phony civil liberties violations while ignoring gun violence totally is noted.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:59 pm
@oralloy,
Your attempts at reasoning are ludicrous.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 03:00 pm
@MontereyJack,
Your inability to point out any flaws in my reasoning says otherwise.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 02:40:14