Guns: how much longer will it take ....

@InfraBlue,

Quote:

I want you stop with your ridiculous pistol grip tangent.

Why should he, you are the one who said pistol grips were "especially dangerous" he's just trying to find out what you meant by that and how they make them so dangerous. If you want him to stop, you should retract your statement and admit you were wrong and that you don't know what you are talking about.

1 Reply

@InfraBlue,

Quote:

I want you stop with your ridiculous pistol grip tangent.

But you've stated that a pistol-grip on a rifle makes that rifle especially dangerous. And when I point out to you that you have nothing to back that claim, you tell me that you could back it up if you wanted to, but that you don't want to. And so I'm curious as to why you wouldn't want to ban rifles with pistol-grips since you believe that they make a rifle especially dangerous all by themselves. Is that too much to ask?

Also, Baldimo summed up the issue perfectly. If there's anything about his post that leaves you confused, just ask me about it, and I will straighten you out.

2 Replies

@Glennn,

Nothing like diverting a conversation from life and death to pistol grip trivia. Is that all you got?

2 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

What do you disagree with, or are you just here to complain about the world?

2 Replies

@Glennn,

I disagree with your continuous deflecting the discussion with your infinite pistol grip yammering, move on for Pete's sake.

2 Replies

@Glennn,

Glennn wrote:

What do you disagree with, or are you just here to complain about the world?

It was a drive by...

1 Reply

@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:

I disagree with your continuous deflecting the discussion with your infinite pistol grip yammering, move on for Pete's sake.

Well, if you believe I've been deflecting, then why don't you make a point if you have one. Otherwise, go cry somewhere else.

But as long as someone calls for banning a gun because it has a pistol-grip, I'm going to stick their nose into their own baseless claims. But on the off chance that you've got more under your hat than your issue with me, what feature turns a rifle into an assault weapon?

1 Reply

@McGentrix,

Quote:

It was a drive by...

And not a very well-planned one. He got shot down; took a bullet to the mouth.

0 Replies

@Baldimo,

If he hasn't figured out what I meant by now after his endless tail chasing, he's a lost cause.

I wasn't wrong. I do know what I'm talking about. So you don't accept it, understood.

1 Reply

@Glennn,

Glennn wrote:

Quote:
I want you stop with your ridiculous pistol grip tangent.

But you've stated that a pistol-grip on a rifle makes that rifle especially dangerous. And when I point out to you that you have nothing to back that claim, you tell me that you could back it up if you wanted to, but that you don't want to. And so I'm curious as to why you wouldn't want to ban rifles with pistol-grips since you believe that they make a rifle especially dangerous all by themselves. Is that too much to ask?

Also, Baldimo summed up the issue perfectly. If there's anything about his post that leaves you confused, just ask me about it, and I will straighten you out.

See what I told Baldimo about you.

1 Reply

@InfraBlue,

Even you haven't figured out what you mean. You say a pistol-grips make a rifle especially dangerous. And when someone points out that you need to prove that claim, you characterize their request for proof as them "chasing their own tail."

So . . .

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Nothing like diverting a conversation from life and death to pistol grip trivia. Is that all you got?

Glennn is not diverting anything. Glennn is addressing progressive efforts to outlaw pistol grips head on.

There never was a conversation about saving lives. Progressives do not care about saving lives. Progressives care only about the sadistic pleasure that they get from violating people's civil liberties.

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

I disagree with your continuous deflecting the discussion with your infinite pistol grip yammering,

Addressing progressive efforts to outlaw pistol grips is not a deflection. That is what the conversation is actually about.

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

move on for Pete's sake.

Request denied. We are not going to stop opposing progressive efforts to outlaw pistol grips.

0 Replies

@InfraBlue,

while Orl is worrying about people worrying about the ubiquitous pistol grip, maybe some real work can get done by more intelligent folk.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Your inability to point out anything untrue in my posts is evidence that I am smarter than you are.

And no. Your mad quest to outlaw pistol grips undermines all other gun control efforts. So there is going to be no new gun control of any sort.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

maybe some real work can get done by more intelligent folk.

Intelligent people will not give an inch to people they know that will take a mile.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Oh oh. They're sending in the little guns.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Ive never ever worried about that. Only you seem to spread the rumor of you SB score. (They change through life and I believe that, you are more like mid avg, (like 125 0r so).

You seem to need some form of validation about what a "goood boy" you are.
"Whose a gooood boy??" ( and you answer with WOOF).

Most people around here have bested you with only one of their lobes firing missing.

Your constant head beating about cosmetic features on guns is an example of your inability to cobble any kind of arguments.
Youre really a simple minded and boring dude know that?

Really smart folks have excellent senses of humor, you seem to hqve NONE. Bye for t'nite. Im goin back to the studio to work.
Im starting to develop habits like yours (the constant Frank Apisa style of wasting hundreds of pages on ONE MEASLY TEENY TOPIC)
Oh yeh, youre kinda creepy like Frank.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

Ive never ever worried about that.

Your constant commentary about my intellect shows that you worry quite a bit about the fact that I'm smarter than you are.

farmerman wrote:

Only you seem to spread the rumor of you SB score.

You are the person who raises the subject of my intellect. I merely correct your untrue statements.

farmerman wrote:

I believe that, you are more like mid avg, (like 125 0r so).

My IQ is 170. That is vastly superior to yours.

farmerman wrote:

You seem to need some form of validation about what a "goood boy" you are.
"Whose a gooood boy??" ( and you answer with WOOF).

I merely set the record straight when you lie about me.

farmerman wrote:

Most people around here have bested you with only one of their lobes firing missing.

You cannot point to any examples of people besting me.

farmerman wrote:

Your constant head beating about cosmetic features on guns is an example of your inability to cobble any kind of arguments.

The fact that you have no answer to those arguments other than childish name-calling shows that they are cobbled together quite well.

farmerman wrote:

Youre really a simple minded and boring dude know that?

I am vastly smarter than you are, as is easily demonstrated by your inability to point out anything untrue in my posts.

farmerman wrote:

Really smart folks have excellent senses of humor, you seem to hqve NONE.

That you lack the intelligence to perceive something does not mean that it is not there.

farmerman wrote:

Im starting to develop habits like yours (the constant Frank Apisa style of wasting hundreds of pages on ONE MEASLY TEENY TOPIC)

You've had those habits all along. There would not be constant discussion of pistol grips if you did not constantly demand to outlaw them.

farmerman wrote:

Oh yeh, youre kinda creepy like Frank.

You engage in childish name-calling because you are not capable of defending your position using facts or logic.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

Your constant head beating about cosmetic features on guns is an example of your inability to cobble any kind of arguments.
Youre really a simple minded and boring dude know that?

You must think that any dumbass claims about how a flash suppressor or pistol-grip or barrel-shroud makes a rifle especially dangerous should be left to stand unchallenged, and that anyone who challenges that dumbass claim should be insulted and dismissed. But that kind of dumbass thinking is about (but not quite) as intelligent as a bag of rocks, and about (but not quite) as interesting as a bag of snot.

This post is a reflection of your style when you disagree with someone. Wouldn't it be great if everyone had a personality like yours? Threads would be so full of distasteful flows from the mouths of people like you who would constantly and dumbwittedly demonstrate that they possess the communication skills of someone who hasn't any. Who wouldn't want to join and have some of that?

0 Replies

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know