@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:OK, point to where IVE said that .
When you wildly attack me for opposing a ban on pistol grips, that counts as supporting a ban on pistol grips.
Especially when it comes in a context where progressives are focusing on pistol grips to the exclusion of all other gun control, and you offer no opposition to focusing on pistol grips to the exclusion of all other gun control.
The most recent such post that I am aware of was here:
http://able2know.org/topic/131081-360#post-6927180
where you wrote:
"You and I both know Orals constant weenying about 'pistol grips' is a simple minded and quick way of denying the problem by using false 'reality')"
In other words, when
a) progressives demand that pistol grips be outlawed (and they focus on that to the exclusion of all other gun control), and
b) you offer no opposition to outlawing pistol grips, and
c) you offer no opposition to the idea of sabotaging all other gun control for the sake of an attempt to outlaw pistol grips, and
d) I oppose their demand to outlaw pistol grips, and
e) you wildly attack me for opposing their demand to outlaw pistol grips,
you are supporting a ban on pistol grips.
farmerman wrote:Stop being the one whose sounding silly and use some truth in advertising
I'm not the one who sounds silly.
I always back up my claims. Note the contrast with your own recent failure to back up your claim of having pointed out errors in my posts.