Guns: how much longer will it take ....

No they aren't. You cannot point out anything untrue in my posts.



Creativity isn't my strong point. Facts are my strength.

HMMM, they most often appear together.

So which is it? Is it "semiautomatics" or "military-appearing"? And what do you mean by "controlling"? You want to go door to door and confiscate everyone's military-appearing guns?

Just to be pedantic, you have 3 misspellings in your reply.

Secondly, If his posts are riddled with errors, why is it so difficult for any of you to actually point them out? Seems like it should be an easy process if his posts are "riddled" with them.

Ive pointed them out as weve gone on. Almost every prons rejoinder to oral is a call-out to hie error filled analyses. All hes able to do is wish violence on those who disagree with his insane points , and keep pelting us with his dumass but interminable mantras.

From his style Id think youd be a more magisterial but "kindly uncle" and try to point out his persistent lackalogic.
I suppose that When youre super glued to this president as I think many of you are, you seem to give up fact and reason. You seem to ignore his massive moats and justify them as "protecting your civil rights" or some other cobbled "logic".(Oral, like Trump, serves hizzown Civil rights and maks sure thyre at the expense of mine) Thats the Real Estate Shyster in him.

Taking property and all these draconian tortures on families who are seeking mental relief after having their kids slaughtered is certinly not the AMerican Way, (xcept under el duce's regime).

I've left a few mis spellings in so you can keep yourself entertained.

HMMM, Im getting really bad cause I only spotted 2 mis spellings. Unless youve counted GAGE as a misspell

He is showing his trumpness by talking about misspellings rather than refuting the post. Something that he believes demeans the poster. Kind of like ollie the prevacator.

he he, McG is the smart one in the pack. He doesnt go round claiming numerical scores.
Yes the GOP isnt even trying to hide the fact that process is all theyve got at this point. In reality they have NO evidence to claim the "witch hunt rule"

When I have found Oralloy to be wrong I have pointed it out. It's just not that often. You seem to be a smart fella in your field of specialty and despite your opinion, I consider Oralloy to be a specialist in gun rights and I am glad to have him on the right side of that argument.

Your rights shall not infringe upon mine and I am fine with MY rights not infringing upon yours. I will NOT, however, have my rights diminished due to a criminal action by others and I refuse to be governed to the lowest common denominator.

Hear, hear!

Your rights were diminished long before you were born and you are governed to the lowest common denominator in regard to firearms and their regulation. There will be more to come.

Really? Like what?

Probably the reinstatement or some form of The Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act.

You mean the one in which a semiautomatic rifle that looks like an assault weapon will be lumped in with actual assault weapons, even though they don't meet the standard?

Youve already drawn a conclusion that Trumps actions are legal and even if not, are not impeachable. We sit a canyon chasm apart on that kind of thinking.

If they are provably true (thats what this phase of investigation is about, its more like a Grand Jury), then the hrges are Bribery or Extortion. Im probably going to be using that now that the committee and the Speaker have named it.
At least one of those is highlighted by name in the US Constitution as originally ratified.

s far as Oral. I dont insist he stop sounding a little slow headed, but Its my option to rmind him.
When he spaks in mantras and spews two lines about
1pistol grips
2 civil rights "for un"
Both are idiotic silly, stupid phrses that hve no business in a discussion from someone so slf satisfied.
Ive found his "Knowledge" of guns to be based on one single point, and, as far as real-world experience, Gunga snake and I took him a bit apart when he failed to explain how we target with a shotgun.

You keep up your sides argumnts, at least theyre better thought out than his.
We will see how close the rel evidence presents itself. I already know our country is so polarized that , as long as the Senate is run by the GOP, he probably wont be convicted.

This is entirely different than Clinton's impeachment, 2 yars wre wasted trying to find anything on the Clinton case. Only after he delivered himself via "Happy Pants" and then ;ying about it , did he have anything impeachable. I think he should have been found guilty and removed from office. We then would perhaps have been spared the GWB years and his inability to understand macro-economics.

This president has delivered himself via his evil sidekick . He has NOT denied the phone call and the underlying story has merely to be proven to the Senate. Even if found Not guilty you really think America would trust a "walking felon" for another term???. I think the battle for thw presidency will b from the declared independents. You guys are summing up that"If hes not found guilty, hes a shoe-in for reelection".
I think the US public is not at all stupid and malleable to his Circus Act.

Wrong again. You cannot link to any post where you have ever pointed out an error on my part.



Only a progressive or a fascist would say that civil liberties are insane.



You also are not capable of providing any examples of errors in my logic.



Wrong again. The only people here who make posts without any facts or reason are progressives.



My massive moats?

Yes, it is indeed important that you be prevented from violating people's civil liberties for fun. Go find some other way to have fun.



That is incorrect. You do not have any right to violate people's civil liberties for fun. Preventing you from violating other people's civil liberties for fun does not violate your civil liberties.



Wrong again. In the American system, people who are hassled with frivolous lawsuits have every right to make the offending party pay all of their legal bills.

Actually it is progressives who like to nitpick about pointless details instead of addressing facts.



Your lack of honor and integrity is shameful. You cannot point out anything untrue in my posts.

Not unless you get the support of moderate gun rights activists. And you will have to abandon your radical extremism before you have a chance at getting that support.

That means no longer trying to violate people's civil liberties for fun.

PS McG, Im a life time gun owner and sportsman. I own everything from several pitol of all calibres and rifls (from .171 to a 45-70, that I fashion my own loads ith small mass an larger loads so I get range for varmints ).
I carry a .45 revolver into the woods .(I took advice from ol Om Sig David re the reliability of a revolver v an auto) We have 600+ [pound bears in our Northern forests (which is the same area that weve installed gas wells).

Im a well stocked hunter and I often do my own loads, Im high ranked in clays as well as a small game and waterfowl hunter.
I still insist e must do something about the availability of the kinds of guns that can do damage by virtue of being able to deliver heavy amounts of ammo downrange. (You and I both know Orals constant weenying about "pistol grips" is a simple minded and quick way of denying the problem by using false "reality")

Sticking ones head in the sand and refusing to be part of the solution makes one merely a passive member of the problem.
Having our kids killed is about the most EXTREME means of interfering with ones civil rights so your guy cannot mount a high moral ground that is believable (and hopefully will be indefensible in the long run).

Not a chance. No one is going to let you violate their civil liberties for fun.