57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 06:29 pm
New gun nut violence in Odessa, Texas. Five killed so far, 17 mo. baby shot in the face. Thanks again, gun nuts.
glitterbag
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 06:59 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

For what it's worth, there's another shooting spree ongoing in Texas right now.


Just out of morbid curiosity, what's it worth to you?
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  5  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 07:21 pm
@edgarblythe,
5 killed, 13 hospitalized with critical injuries..........there are 4 more months left in 2019....we need to sober up before this entire country goes up in flames.
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 08:32 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
Thanks again, gun nuts.

Not gun nuts; it was just one.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 08:54 pm
@oralloy,
You gonna stack up the dead bodies and piss on them, oralloy? Didn't you say that was the way to deal with gun violence?
McGentrix
 
  0  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:01 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

It was totally a political decision by a conservative activist Supreme Court:

District of Columbia v. Heller recognized an individual right to possess a firearm under the Constitution. Here’s why the case was wrongly decided.

and

The five extra words that can fix the Second Amendment

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.”


Or, we just scratch out 4 and have "Being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:09 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Read the whole statement dimwit "in a WELL REGULATED MILITIA".


That's not what it says. An you call others "dimwit"?

Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


It says the right of the PEOPLE, it doesn't say the right of the MILITIA. What is so difficult about this to understand?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:10 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Didn't you say that was the way to deal with gun violence?

You might want to review this request from neptuneblue:
http://able2know.org/topic/131081-295#post-6890527

That said.... No new gun laws. Let the slaughter continue. Have fun helplessly wringing your hands while nothing is done.

Mr. Green
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:29 pm
@Glennn,
More correctly it was another one. /but there is a multitudes of gun nuts that make these outrages more likely.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:31 pm
@McGentrix,
Misread it all you want, it says your right to bear arms in a well regulated militia shall not be abridged.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:33 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
That is incorrect. The right to keep and bear arms includes the right to have guns for private self defense.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:33 pm
@oralloy,
That must be warming the cockles of your heart.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:41 pm
@izzythepush,
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/27/marines-punished-urinating-taliban-corpses/

Marines punished for urinating on Taliban corpses

By Kristina Wong - The Washington Times - Monday, August 27, 2012

After an eight-month investigation, three Marines were punished Monday for urinating on dead Taliban terrorists in a video that spread through the Internet in January.

The Marine Corps declined to reveal the specific punishments or the names of the Marines, who were deployed with the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment from Camp Lejeune, N.C. Punishments in an administrative proceeding could include reduction in rank, restriction to base, extra duties, forfeiture of pay, a reprimand or a combination of these measures, the Corps said in a statement.

“We hold Marines to a high standard of ethical behavior. The Marine Corps takes misconduct by Marines very seriously and is committed to holding accountable those who are responsible,” the Corps said.

One of the Marines, a noncommissioned officer, pleaded guilty to wrongly posing for an unofficial photograph with human casualties and urinating on the body of a deceased Taliban militant. Another noncommissioned officer pleaded guilty to “wrongfully video-recording” the incident, as well as wrongfully posing for the photograph.

A staff noncommissioned officer admitted his guilt for failing to report the mistreatment of human casualties by other Marines and for making a false official statement to an investigator with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service concerning his knowledge of the video.

Disciplinary actions action against other Marines involved in the incident will be announced at a later date, the Corps said.


I guess ol' Oralloy wants to be a marine.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:44 pm
I personally don't care who interprets the second amendment how. It's beyond time to get these dangerous weapons away from everybody in the country.
Glennn
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:44 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
More correctly it was another one.

More correctly, we call them murderers.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 09:48 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
I personally don't care who interprets the second amendment how. It's beyond time to get these dangerous weapons away from everybody in the country.

Your term "these dangerous weapons" means what exactly?
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 10:25 pm
@oralloy,
Thank you for making it perfectly clear that while you prattle endlessly about the Constitution you really don't give a **** at the massive violations of civil rights commited every yrear by the pro-gun acrivists (that must be who's doing it because they actually actively use their guns to do it.
snood
 
  5  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 10:26 pm
@oralloy,
It doesn’t really matter what he means since you don’t believe any weapons need to be removed.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 10:36 pm
@snood,
I say that the nation must do this one thing. I'm not going to say what this one thing is, but I say that the nation must do it, and we must do it soon.

Seriously, so long as he is not calling for anything specific to be removed, he really isn't calling for anything at all.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 10:42 pm
@oralloy,
All the kinds of weapons that have ben used to murder people.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 08:00:45