Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Again with the explaining.

This is Able2Know.com, you'd be better suited to FuckedifIknow.com.

It's hardly rocket science. If you're spending an extra $48million on safeguarding your schools from the NRA your children are put at a disadvantage.

Other developed countries don't need to waste money on measures like that so the money can be spent on other things, like paying teacher's salaries.

It's not as if you're ahead of the field academically, if you were I wouldn't have to explain the flaming obvious to you.

When I was at college we hard a student exchange with American universities. The ones that came over here were in their third year, but put in with the freshers, and even then they had trouble.

I'd only just left school and two weeks into the course I had American students at least three years older than me who had already been at university for two years asking me how to write a ******* essay!

Really? Which members of the NRA have shot up some schools?

If you're spending an extra $48million on safeguarding your schools from the NRA

You still don't get it. You don't think, you don't reason,

you just reset and repeat.

One of these days you'll need to invest in an education. Every one of your "retorts" are factually incorrect.


Again, ownership of weapons is an assumed right not explicitly guaranteed by any of the Bill of rights, like freedom of the press, religion, free speech, vote, association, movement etc.

You haven't a clue about what a well regulated militia is, do you?

Again, ownership of weapons is an assumed right not explicitly guaranteed by any of the Bill of rights, like freedom of the press, religion, free speech, vote, association, movement etc.

You haven't a clue about what a well regulated militia is, do you?

In order to drive s car one has to prove to the state their capable of driving one. Why is it so hard for you to see that the same holds true for guns.

All your second amendment b s isent rational.

The supreme court hasent said that government can't regulate it for the protection of its citizens.

All you gun nuts know this

and all your arguments are b s.

Since when do we have to prove anything to use a constitutional right?

In the last three weeks US authorities have arrested at least 28 people accused of threatening acts of mass violence. What's behind this surge and could they all be convicted?

The threats ranged from posts on social media and video gaming sites to verbal comments to colleagues and friends. In at least two cases, suspects sent text messages to ex-partners. Hoards of weapons were also found in some cases.

The FBI won't say what is behind the steep bump in apprehensions, some carried out by that agency, others by local police. It's not clear if it marks a growth in threats or simply a rise in awareness and tip-offs.

But former FBI boss Andrew McCabe said on Friday there was undoubtedly a "renewed awareness" focused on the sort of threats that a few months ago might have been ignored by investigators mindful of the right to free speech as enshrined in the US Constitution.

The first amendment offers broad protection of free speech, even if that speech is racist or of a violent nature. Prosecutions in the US are further complicated by the second amendment which safeguards the right to bear arms.

So what can be done to stop a shooter before they strike?

It's the NRA that stops meaningful life saving legislation to occur.