23
   

Sarah Palin will NEVER be president.

 
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 09:08 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
My understanding is that all of the posts of freepers, tico, okie, foxfyre, gopusa and other such are going to be gathered together and archived in a huge data base known as wikitedia.

Meanwhile, the posts of blatham -- and just the posts of blatham -- have been grouped into a new database referred to as Wikiblovia.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 10:47 am
@Ticomaya,
And, coming in an embarrassingly distant second place...
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 08:12 pm
@Green Witch,
Quote:
Finn, I think my above post proves my point.


Your post proves your point?

How convenient.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 08:15 pm
Obviously, any candidate, whether man or woman, white or black, gay or straight, who advances conservative principles must be destroyed!
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 09:59 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Obviously, any candidate, whether man or woman, white or black, gay or straight, who advances conservative principles must be destroyed!


You ought not to waste time being that silly and obtuse, finn.

There were any number of Republicans who McCain might have chosen and who would not have gained derision such as Palin received. She gained it, including from many serious and experienced Republicans, because her candidacy deserved derision.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 10:09 pm
@blatham,
I think not.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Nov, 2008 10:15 pm
@blatham,
You ought not to waste time blatham by being so disingenuous.

There were any number of Republicans who would not have been derided in the way Palin was because there was any number of Republicans who the MSM would not have seen as a threat or a conservative true-believer.

What pick would have received a fair shake?



blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 07:33 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
What is a 'conservative true-believerism'? Is 'dinosaurs walked with man' a necessary component? Demon out-casting? Reagan's Earned Income Tax Credit as socialist-redistribution?

You avoid the phenomenon of lifelong Republicans and conservatives turning away from the McCain ticket because of the presence of Palin on that ticket. Because, explicitly, of her obvious unfitness for such a post. To blame the media for their perceptions of her is an inexcusable intellectual dishonesty on your part.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 07:39 am
I cannot for the life of me understand why you would ever expect intellectual honesty from Finn. He only ever has the purpose here of getting a rise out of people, of raising a stink. He cares little how he does it.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 07:58 am
@Setanta,
I've had some good (orderly, logical, give and take) conversations with finn in the past. But it would be false to suggest those instances are much evident over the last few years. Particularly in this election, as it approached and as it ended, finn has decamped from the rational.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 08:03 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
What exactly are conservative principle?

Foxfyre can't seem to give a definition of them on the conservative thread.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 08:04 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
What do you mean by "fair shake"?

Gingrich would have been attacked for his policies which seems to be fair in politics.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2008 08:43 am
Good piece from Benen...
Quote:
November 11, 2008
PALIN'S P.R. OFFENSIVE.... Christopher Orr noted that as recently as Friday, Sarah Palin told reporters that she's ready to get back to the people's business. "[E]very day is a full day here in the governor's office," Palin said. "It's gonna be busy days here just like it was busy days on the trail, being the governor full-time in addition to being a candidate. Now, of course, we get to concentrate just on one of those."

While I don't doubt that Palin is ready to focus her energies on one of the responsibilities, I'm not sure it's the one she was elected to do.

Last night, for example, was the first of a two-part interview with Fox News' Greta van Susteren, during which the Alaska governor talked about her clothes, her reported ignorance, her perspective on the political landscape, and her future plans.

Ms. Palin directed most of her media criticism at liberal bloggers, whom she twice called, "those bloggers in their parents' basement just talkin' garbage."

But she had a kind word for President-elect Barack Obama, who she said called her during the campaign to wish her luck.
Quote:

"He was cool," Ms. Palin said, with almost a giggle. "He said, 'good luck, but not that much luck.'"

On the question of whether Ms. Palin will run in 2012, she answered, "This is what I always do. I'm like, O.K., God, if there is an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like, don't let me miss the open door. Show me where the open door is. Even if it's cracked up a little bit, maybe I'll plow right on through that and maybe prematurely plow through it, but don't let me miss an open door. And if there is an open door in '12 or four years later, and if it is something that is going to be good for my family, for my state, for my nation, an opportunity for me, then I'll plow through that door."


For those keeping score, that quote included six references to an "open door," and three references to "plowing" through it. Palin, in other words, seems to have given the next presidential race quite a bit of thought.

As for "concentrating" on "being the governor full-time," Palin will appear on NBC's "Today" show this morning, will talk to CNN's Wolf Blitzer tomorrow, and will speak at the Republican Governors Conference in Miami on Thursday.

"[E]very day is a full day here in the governor's office"? Perhaps, but not for the reasons one might expect.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2008 10:43 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
You avoid the phenomenon


You avoid the question.

What pick would have received a fair shake?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2008 10:47 pm
@Setanta,
I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would perceive your bitter paranoia to be anything other than what it is.

Get thee to Wikipedia Pooch.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2008 10:49 pm
@blatham,
Well Pooch, perhaps there are those who share your shrill animosity.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2008 10:54 pm
@parados,
Parados

I'm to bed now, but will respond to you anon.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2008 10:56 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Good God, man...

shirley yer not on the Pitbull bandwagon?

(that would make this too easy..)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  0  
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 08:01 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You avoid the question.

What pick would have received a fair shake?


You protested the degree of ridicule that Palin's nomination garnered (much of it, as I noted earlier, from conservatives). No other potential VP choice would have gained such ridicule because no other potential candidate was/is so clearly unfit for such responsibilities, with the notable exception of Joe the Plumber, of course.
Jindal, Lieberman, Lugar, Graham, Warner, Sununu, Specter, Romney, Hagel, Voinovich, Guiliani, Huckabee, Hunter, Powell, McConnel, Hutchinson, Dole, Boehner, Grassley, Sessions, Martinez, Snow, Collins, Bond, thune etc etc

0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 05:26 pm
And now it seems that FOX, MSNBC, other major news outlets, the political left, and the dems have all been suckered.

There was a report on the networks that an "unnamed McCain campaign figure" claimed that Sarah Palin didnt know that Africa was a continent.

Now that appears to have been an elaborate hoax.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/arts/television/13hoax.html?_r=3&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Quote:
It was among the juicier post-election recriminations: Fox News Channel quoted an unnamed McCain campaign figure as saying that Sarah Palin did not know that Africa was a continent.

Who would say such a thing? On Monday the answer popped up on a blog and popped out of the mouth of David Shuster, an MSNBC anchor. “Turns out it was Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, who has come forward today to identify himself as the source of the leaks,” Mr. Shuster said.

Trouble is, Martin Eisenstadt doesn’t exist. His blog does, but it’s a put-on. The think tank where he is a senior fellow " the Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy " is just a Web site. The TV clips of him on YouTube are fakes.


So now I wonder, are those of you that believed the report willing to admit you got suckered?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 04:16:33