@TNTABC123,
TNTABC123 wrote:
Quote:so who is going to devise this new phonetic alphabet?
Maybe fonetic lexicografers, writing nu dictionaries.
TNTABC123 wrote:
Quote:for example how would spell 'example' in a natural way?
what would the alphabet sound like?
That wud not be among the changes, in my opinion.
I 'd leave it alone, or delete the first e:
xample.
TNTABC123 wrote:
Quote:and how is it torturing and intimidationg children?
like the history of Edgar Cayce, who was terrified of his father
who scared him into trying to memorize his spelling book,
learning unnatural, non-fonetic spelling.
That our fathers n grandfathers have been stupid and erred
is not a good cause to continue the error.
TNTABC123 wrote:
Quote:it really isn't incredibly difficult,
once you have learnt the rules and with a few exceptions,
to spell something just from hearing it.
My objections r confined mostly to those exceptions,
like adding the letters UGH to the word tho
or spelling the word enuf as enough. Senseless.
MOST of English is
ALREADY fonetic.
David