39
   

McCain is blowing his election chances.

 
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 01:37 pm
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Here you have the current message of the McCain campaign from no less an authority than Rick Davis:

    "Only celebrities like Barack Obama go to the gym three times a day, demand ?'MET-RX chocolate roasted-peanut protein bars and bottles of a hard-to-find organic brew?-Black Forest Berry Honest Tea' and worry about the price of arugula."


They really played the arugula card? For all McCain's personal qualities, we're learning that the machine behind the GOP simply re-makes the campaign in its own Coulterite image. Instead of actually fighting on the core questions - how do we get out of Iraq with the least damage? how do we get past carbon-based energy? how do we tackle al Qaeda's new base in Pakistan and within the nuclear-armed Pakistani government? how will we reduce the massive debt bequeathed us by the Bush-Rove GOP? how do we restore the Geneva Conventions? - we are debating people's cultural insecurities and food choices.

The slow collapse of conservatism as a coherent governing philosophy is not unrelated to this. If you never want to fight campaigns on policy, why bother crafting any?

That hits the nail on the head about as firmly as one could imagine.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 01:43 pm
real life wrote:
Obama's lack of experience, his tendency to dodge tough decisions, his penchant for associating with racists and terrorists and his insinuations of racism if he is not nominated probably have nothing to do with it.

To just tackle the most (or only) serious item in your list, even that does not make sense for the kind of voter Lash, Bill and I are referring to. Voters who suppported Hillary passionately, and obviously, then, support the politics and ideals she stands for.

Obama shares most all of those politics and ideals; McCain holds the opposite conviction on most. How does experience, then, rationally trump this consideration? Who would prefer someone with lots of experience who will use that experience to push through policies that you abhor, over someone who shares your views but has little experience?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 01:48 pm
This one made me LOL when I saw it in the paper:

http://roadkillrefugee.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/vader.png
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 04:37 pm
This Politico article nicely illustrates the silliness of John McCain, long-time media darling, attacking Obama as a "celebrity".

Quote:
If Obama's A "Celebrity," What's McCain?

Politico: As McCamp Camp Tries To Brand Obama A "Celebrity Politician," It's Worth Considering McCain's Own Media Status

August 3, 2008

If Barack Obama gave new meaning to the term "political celebrity," then John McCain helped define it.

He emerged as the most popular Republican in Hollywood following his 2000 presidential primary defeat, winning more screen time than the rest of Congress combined. McCain made cameos in "Wedding Crashers" and "24," saw his memoir turned into a popular biopic on A&E, and appeared more than 30 times on late night comedy shows.

So this week, when McCain cast Obama's celebrity as a disqualifier, it seemed like a curious turn.

Just one day before McCain released an advertisement interspersing pictures of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears with footage of Obama addressing 200,000 people in Berlin, actor Jon Voight told Variety that McCain had "many great, intelligent, talented Academy-winning actors standing by, awaiting a major press conference to show their support."

"[The ad] is a bit ironic given that McCain has been the most pop-culture savvy Republican candidate in quite some time," said Ted Johnson, managing editor of Variety and editor of the blog Wilshire and Washington, which monitors the intersection of celebrity and politics. [..]

It's a striking line of attack for McCain, who's accepted without complaint the "celebrity" epithet from journalists for four decades. "John's been a celebrity ever since he was shot down," former McCain strategist John Weaver told The Atlantic earlier this week, "whatever that means." [..]

Hollywood warmed to him in 2000 as he ran against one of its least favorite people, George W. Bush. He endeared himself with liberals, including Warren Beatty, by taking unconventional stances for a Republican presidential candidate, such as favoring campaign finance reform and challenging the Christian right. His open-door approach with journalists made him the darling of the media elite. "You can definitely makes the case that McCain stands out among Republicans for his associations with Hollywood and his celebrity status," Johnson said. [..]

In the years that followed, he became a near-regular on the late-night comedy circuit, appearing eight times on "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," 12 times on the "Late Show with David Letterman," 10 times on "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno," and three times on "Late Night with Conan O'Brien," according to imdb.com.

He hosted "Saturday Night Live" in 2002. "Faith of My Fathers" pulled in 3.7 million viewers on A&E in 2005, making it the network's most popular program in over a year. He appeared on "24" in 2006. And he made a brief cameo in "Wedding Crashers," offering congratulations to the father of the bride, a senator played by Christopher Walken. [..]

A liberal blog noted this week that the McCain campaign had scrubbed its website of an Associated Press story from last year that described him as a "political celebrity." [But] McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said the article was removed as part of routine housecleaning of the website several weeks ago. [..]
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 04:39 pm
And now Kathy Hilton, Paris's mother and thus far a McCain supporter, adds her 2 cents ... what a freak show.

Quote:
Kathy Hilton: McCain's Celebrity Ad: Frivolous, A Waste Of Money, A Waste Of Time

I've been asked again and again for my response to the now infamous McCain celebrity ad. I actually have three responses. It is a complete waste of the money John McCain's contributors have donated to his campaign. It is a complete waste of the country's time and attention at the very moment when millions of people are losing their homes and their jobs. And it is a completely frivolous way to choose the next President of the United States.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 10:21 pm
Ouch.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 07:36 am
Obama blows his chances at getting elected by ducking debates with McCain.

One Week, 9-Point Lead Lost for Obama in Tracking Poll Laughing
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:44 am
H2O_MAN wrote:
Obama blows his chances at getting elected by ducking debates with McCain.

One Week, 9-Point Lead Lost for Obama in Tracking Poll Laughing

Scheduled debates:

Sept. 6, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS (presidential candidates)
Oct. 2, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (vice presidential candidates)
Oct 7, Belmont, University, Nashville, TN (presidential candidates)
Oct, 15, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY (presidential candidates)
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:08 am
nimh wrote:
This Politico article nicely illustrates the silliness of John McCain, long-time media darling, attacking Obama as a "celebrity".


The celebrity issue is more than a campaign issue.

The media will continue to handle Obama with kid gloves far into his first term, if he gets the nod.

It will only be when the wheels come off that some will dare leave the reservation to take an honest look at 'Present' Obama.

Look how the media treated Clinton even after his non-responses to four terrorist attacks on America, even after he committed perjury, even after he was FORCED to sign a balanced budget AND welfare reform by a Republican congress, even after Hilly's attempt at nationalizing the health care industry and mandating criminal penalties for those who paid for health care out of their own pocket, even after the Arkansas scandals such as the prisoner blood/HIV scandal were too obvious to ignore, even after burning women and children alive in Waco Texas, even after .............

.........shall I continue?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:11 am
real life wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
nimh wrote:
Lash wrote:
I guess most people see Obama and Hillary so close in their views that it does make one wonder how someone could heartily support Hillary and not transfer that support easily to Obama...unless race is a factor.


Yep
Yep. It is both stunning and disappointing how many here are able to deny the seemingly obvious merit in this observation.


Obama's lack of experience, his tendency to dodge tough decisions, his penchant for associating with racists and terrorists and his insinuations of racism if he is not nominated probably have nothing to do with it.

Haven't read to see if anyone else responded to this, but I'll tell you--I don't think any of this is accurate.

Hillary has no more experience than Obama.
All politicians dodge tough questions, including Hillary.
You're kidding about the racists and terrorists... Hillary paid for black support by a guy who said some really raunchy race-based things (in South Carolina, was it?)
Race seems to factor heavily in your reasoning... Are you saying Obama has accused people who aren't voting for him of being racists?

I'd enjoy seeing your actual evidence for these accusations. I'm not even saying it doesn't exist---but so many times, we project hearsay and our own preconceived attitudes onto others... I know I've done it. Wondering if maybe you have.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  2  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:11 am
Every time I heard/hear Bill Clinton speak, I get sick to my stomach.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:23 am
real life wrote:
nimh wrote:
This Politico article nicely illustrates the silliness of John McCain, long-time media darling, attacking Obama as a "celebrity".


The celebrity issue is more than a campaign issue.


No, right now it's a campaign issue. And McLiar has long been getting free passes from the media, still does when he has clearly shown himself to be nothing more than a lying two-faced panderer, who can't keep the issues straight from one sentecne to the next.

He will be slaughtered in any debate. It will be the most embarrassing thing TV has ever shown. They'll have to rig him up so that someone with a joystick can control every movement, every gesture, everything that issues from his mouth.

Even then there'll be these "real life" repuglicans who'll support this dismal failure that is McCain. Those same "real life" repuglicans who have supported the mess of the last eight years.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:24 am
cjhsa wrote:
Every time I heard/hear Bill Clinton speak, I get sick to my stomach.


Must be the carrion that you eat.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:31 am
Lash,

Obama's comments in SF ( just a few days before the PA primary) made reference to those 'who cling to their guns and their religion and their antipathy to those who aren't like them'.

This is a slick way of saying those who don't support him are racist.

And no, I'm not kidding about racists and terrorists. You surely are aware of Obama's friendship with Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, James Meeks.

My reference to dodging tough decisions was not about dodging tough questions (like in an interview) . It was a reference to his habit of voting 'Present' in the Illinois legislature when a tough vote would occur.

I'll grant you that experience is definitely lacking with Hillary AND Obama, but I'd say that her experience (and more importantly her connections due to her marriage to Bill) , would give her much more leverage in getting things done with Congress. She's been a public figure much longer, including her tenure on the board of Walmart, her experience as first lady of AR where she was a force to be reckoned with.

I just think blowing off all criticism with 'you're just racist' is not legit. But that doesn't keep the O team from continuing to play the race card over and over again.

It's much easier than addressing the issues.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 11:38 am
JTT wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Every time I heard/hear Bill Clinton speak, I get sick to my stomach.


Must be the carrion that you eat.


No, it's the carrion coming out of Bill's mouth....
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 12:53 pm
McCain is Forgetting the First Rule of Fight Club

An old political adage says, "He who sets the debate wins the election."

If the presidential election was held tomorrow, it would be hello President Barack Obama because, so far, John McCain is handing him a victory.

McCain is better than the campaign he has run so far. Most people admit that McCain is an inspirational figure - even Obama has admitted that - so why isn't McCain telling voters where he wants to lead them?

Instead, his campaign is all about his opponent.

"He himself is reinforcing that this campaign is all about Obama," says Democratic strategist Mark Siegel. "His ads and his message are all negatives. The problem with that is, it is driving his own negatives up as well."

GOP strategist David Carney disagrees; he says the McCain campaign has no choice but to do what it can to bring down Obama by constantly introducing him to voters through his flaws. "There is no positive that will help McCain," he insists.

Obama's critics say there is no substance behind his rhetoric - but McCain's critics and supporters alike are wondering where is the rhetoric and the substance?

They know McCain is bigger than the campaign he is running, and wonder why he is acting so small.

Siegel points to Bob Dole's campaign against Bill Clinton in 1996, when "the message that Dole was running on against Clinton was, ?'Where is the outrage?'

"Dole had nothing positive to say," he adds. "He came across as a snarling, angry old man and, frankly, McCain is looking snarlier, angrier and older than Dole."

McCain is very smart; his political instincts generally are very good when he is confident and on firm ground. But they are terrible when he feels things are out of control and when he loses faith in himself or the people around him.

Today's close opinion polls have everything to do with Obama. He has not pulled ahead of McCain because he still is an unknown, he's black - and pollsters have not expanded their universes to include the baseline of the new black and youth voters.

Another reason the polling should offer little comfort to Republicans is that the numbers mirror 1980's closeness between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.

That race was not about Carter in the same way this race is not about McCain. Reagan's biggest hurdle was passing the commander-in-chief test; while remaining tied with Carter, Reagan went the entire summer and into the fall passing threshold after threshold. By the end of October, it all broke Reagan's way.

This race has that same feel to it for Obama.

Most of the game of a presidential election is mental; it is, literally, all inside a campaign's head. To remain competitive, the McCain campaign should set the agenda, stop reacting to what Obama does - and let McCain be the bigger guy.

Hard as this is to implement, the McCain campaign should ignore the polls and allow a McCain narrative, with his kind of message, to run its course.

Traditionally, campaigns that are ahead in the polls can't help but be smug. Once McCain actually has a message that is about him, it will force Obama to react to it and to McCain's core values.

What the McCainiacs should stop doing is using their man as a prop in a supermarket, as if he is somebody's grandfather in a suit and tie shopping for groceries. That is not who John McCain is to Americans.

And McCain just looks plain uncomfortable attacking Obama day in and day out. Isn't that what a surrogate should be doing?

For his own good, he should stop talking about Obama. It's like the first rule of Fight Club: Never talk about Fight Club.

As Democrat Siegel says, all that accomplishes is to trivialize the campaign.

McCain must get back to talking about reforming Washington and how that applies to average Americans and how he will lead the way.

McCain Reform can trump Obama Change. In fact, reform means change with stability attached to it, and stability is the one thing that can undercut change.

The choice right now is change with a guy who is running through the forest followed by blue birds and unicorns - and with a grumpy old man shouting at him.

Sort of like a Grimm's fairy tale on steroids.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 01:00 pm
Quote:


McCain Favoring Local Reporters As National Press Sour On One-Time Straight Talker

KANSAS CITY While the traveling press corps was shipped off to a barbecue restaurant here, John McCain charmed his way through an interview with a local TV reporter. Surae Chinn of KCTV posed such less-than-penetrating questions as "How important is Missouri?" and "Have you chosen a running mate?" and -- addressing the candidate's wife, Cindy -- "How do you make your marriage work?"

Moments later, though, the Republican candidate seemed to grow annoyed with the Kansas City Star's Steve Kraske, who pressed him on his recent comment that "nothing is off the table" when it comes to strengthening Social Security.

When Kraske said that McCain presumably wasn't ruling out a payroll tax hike, McCain interrupted: "That's presuming wrong." When the reporter rephrased the question, McCain said: "If you want to keep asking me over and over again, you're welcome to."

It was a brief moment of friction that highlighted how the captain of the Straight Talk Express is having a bumpier ride with journalists than when he ran for president eight years ago. The popular image of the campaign -- McCain bantering with national journalists in the back of his bus -- has, in reality, all but vanished. The traveling press is now routinely stiffed in favor of five-minute sit-downs with local reporters.


Rerouting McCain's Bus
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 02:07 pm
McGentrix wrote:
McCain is better than the campaign he has run so far. Most people admit that McCain is an inspirational figure - even Obama has admitted that - so why isn't McCain telling voters where he wants to lead them?

Instead, his campaign is all about his opponent.

I suppose the obvious answer is that McCain's campaign strategists must feel that attacking Obama will be more successful in the end, than presenting McCain's own viewpoints and plans.

Personally, I would prefer it if both candidates would just talk about the issues and their own plans for solving things and I would decide from that. But I may not represent the "normal" voter.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 02:09 pm
real life wrote:
Lash,

Obama's comments in SF ( just a few days before the PA primary) made reference to those 'who cling to their guns and their religion and their antipathy to those who aren't like them'.
Yeah. I remember that. I thought it was pretty bad, too...
This is a slick way of saying those who don't support him are racist.
...although I think the link to the racial angle is unproven. Maybe I should find the quote in context.
And no, I'm not kidding about racists and terrorists. You surely are aware of Obama's friendship with Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, James Meeks.
I think all the candidates rub elbows with racists. I did not know about the people you mention other than Wright. I'll have to educate myself about them before commenting further. I do know the Wright story, and I just don't give it the weight you do. You don't think there are people with similar viewpoints in McCain's and Clinton's lives?
My reference to dodging tough decisions was not about dodging tough questions (like in an interview) . It was a reference to his habit of voting 'Present' in the Illinois legislature when a tough vote would occur.
This is a major thing to me. The worst thing about Obama. Good point.
I'll grant you that experience is definitely lacking with Hillary AND Obama, but I'd say that her experience (and more importantly her connections due to her marriage to Bill) , would give her much more leverage in getting things done with Congress. She's been a public figure much longer, including her tenure on the board of Walmart, her experience as first lady of AR where she was a force to be reckoned with.
Again, noted.
I just think blowing off all criticism with 'you're just racist' is not legit. But that doesn't keep the O team from continuing to play the race card over and over again.

It's much easier than addressing the issues.


Thank you so much for fleshing out your opinion. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 02:11 pm
Lash wrote:
real life wrote:
Lash,

Obama's comments in SF ( just a few days before the PA primary) made reference to those 'who cling to their guns and their religion and their antipathy to those who aren't like them'.
Yeah. I remember that. I thought it was pretty bad, too...
This is a slick way of saying those who don't support him are racist.
...although I think the link to the racial angle is unproven. Maybe I should find the quote in context.
And no, I'm not kidding about racists and terrorists. You surely are aware of Obama's friendship with Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, James Meeks.
I think all the candidates rub elbows with racists. I did not know about the people you mention other than Wright. I'll have to educate myself about them before commenting further. I do know the Wright story, and I just don't give it the weight you do. You don't think there are people with similar viewpoints in McCain's and Clinton's lives?
My reference to dodging tough decisions was not about dodging tough questions (like in an interview) . It was a reference to his habit of voting 'Present' in the Illinois legislature when a tough vote would occur.
This is a major thing to me. The worst thing about Obama. Good point.
I'll grant you that experience is definitely lacking with Hillary AND Obama, but I'd say that her experience (and more importantly her connections due to her marriage to Bill) , would give her much more leverage in getting things done with Congress. She's been a public figure much longer, including her tenure on the board of Walmart, her experience as first lady of AR where she was a force to be reckoned with.
Again, noted.
I just think blowing off all criticism with 'you're just racist' is not legit. But that doesn't keep the O team from continuing to play the race card over and over again.

It's much easier than addressing the issues.


Thank you so much for fleshing out your opinion. Very Happy


Lash, you oughta research the 'present' votes Obama did; it was a procedural tool, not an unwillingness to take a position.

Of course, idiot trolls see no such distinctions, but I think it's pretty clearly documented.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/25/2026 at 02:57:18