FreeDuck wrote:Foxfyre wrote:For some it is a matter of partisanship and for some it is a matter of observation and perception.
For many, yourself included, the partisanship colors the perception. You paint a picture of someone who practically has to be tortured with the comfy chair to begrudgingly admit that he loves this country, when in fact I've heard him say repeatedly that he loves this country, that he owes it a debt of service, etc... and without being forced. Now I don't doubt that this is your perception but I think it is skewed by partisanship and other influences that, thankfully, I don't believe most Americans share.
I think that the issue is a manufactured and false issue. When was the last time that the number, tone, and frequency of professions of love for one's country was even considered in a national election?
Well I have listened to a LOT of Obama speeches, interviews, town hall meetings, and read a lot of stuff, and I'm sorry, but my perception is that he has a hard time saying that he loves this country. Perhaps you could refer me to a few sources in which he volunteers that he loves his country and that would change my perception about that particular issue no matter how partisan or biased I might be.
And also intellectual honesty sometimes requires that we acknowledge that perception is sometimes the source of a bias rather than bias always being the cause of perception.
It is a personal bias perhaps that I resent not being able to use a Presidential candidate's full name without being accused of being racist. And I prefer a President who does love his country, sees it as basicly good, and seeks to improve on that. Call me as biased as you want but my bias does make that a personal preference.
The thread title is Obama's Electability. Dismissing negative perceptions out of hand instead of using reasoned arguments to change them will not increase his electability.