Didn't see your latest post, BPB, but looked like I answered it anyway.
Meanwhile I thought this was an interesting... slip, or something, in an article in the Style section of the NYT about Jenna Bush's upcoming wedding in Crawford rather than in the White House:
Quote:On Jan. 20, 2009, the Bushes will be leaving 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue ?- a compelling reason for them to have picked the Western White House over the real thing, said Doug Wead, a former Bush family adviser and the author of "All the Presidents' Children: Triumph and Tragedy in the Lives of America's First Families" (Atria, 2003).
"We can look at it and say, ?'Gee, they practically own the place, they've been there so long,' " Mr. Wead said. "But they've had that bitter feeling of looking in the gates from the outside, and why should the Obamas be walking around the place where they were married? Why not be able to go back to that ranch and hold hands and walk in the moonlight and have it forever?"
"Why should the Obamas..." Not "the McCains" or "the Clintons"...
I'm telling you, BPB, Republicans know they can't beat Obama.
(Leaving alone for now the "ew" factor in that quote...)