hawkeye10 wrote:Chai wrote:There's one of your problems hackeye, you don't see connections.
Ya, for instance I don't see where Hawkeye's problem's according to Chai is relevant to the thread topic, but maybe in in your mind it is. Does this mean that you are done with the topic?? Do you have anything to offer besides drive bys?
You have suffficiently chastised me that I may never be able to show my face on this forum again.
Before I go (yeah, right), the topic is sensitivity to your mate. Although, no man is an island, none of us live in a vacuum etc., the presidential candidates relationship with his/her spouse cannot completely be compartmentalized from anything else going on in his/her life.
Anyone who would say something like "he needs to put his wife on a lease" is so concerned about how the wife makes him look, there wouldn't seem to be a lot of room for "allowing" her to be the individual she wants to be.
Where do you draw the line at putting someone on a leash? Is is just below the level of running for the presidency of the US?
That reminds me of the man who asked a woman if she would sleep with him for $1,000,000. She said yes.
He asked her is she'd sleep with him for $5.00.
"what kind of woman do you think I am?!!", she said.
Well, we're already ascertained that, now we're negotiating.