hamburger wrote:maporsche wrote :
Quote:YOU might be able to defend yourself, but what about that 105lb teacher down the hall being attacked by a 140lb women's volleyball player who just got a C- on her test.
Should that 105lb teacher fear for her life everytime she administer's a bad grade?
so how about allowing everyone to be armed with a concealed book instead of a gun ?
would that be an acceptable solution ?
I think you missed my point. Or you just chose not to address it.
Quote:
i would still be interested to know how you would defend yourself against an assailant shooting you in the back or who'd shoot you with a powerful rifle from some distance ? would your concealed handgun be of much use ?
If I were shot in the back I would not have been able to defend myself. If I were shot from some distance I would not have been able to defend myself.
However, this was not the case in either of the two most recent shootings. So, I'm curious why you bring it up.
Quote:
there is also the question of armed police officers being shot ; care to answer that question ?
Sure, no where does anyone mention or say that just because someone carry's concealed that they are impervious to being harmed. Police officers are actually at a disadvantage here because they have to wear uniforms which paints a large target on their back.
Carrying a concealed weapon simply gives someone a fighting chance, as opposed to having little to no chance.
Why do you bring up these amateur questions?