0
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread V

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 10:18 am
After math

Quote:
THE Iraq war has cost the US 50-60 times more than the Bush administration predicted and was a central cause of the sub-prime banking crisis threatening the world economy, according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.
The former World Bank vice-president yesterday said the war had, so far, cost the US something like $US3trillion ($3.3 trillion) compared with the $US50-$US60-billion predicted in 2003.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23286149-2703,00.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 02:07 pm
Quote:
How Good People Turn Evil, From Stanford to Abu Ghraib
By Kim Zetter 02.28.08 | 12:00 AM
As an expert witness in the defense of an Abu Ghraib guard, Philip Zimbardo had access to many images (NSFW) of abuse taken by the guards. His TED presentation puts together a short video of some of the unpublished photos, with sound effects added by Zimbardo. Many of the images are explicit and gruesome, depicting nudity, degradation, simulated sex acts and guards posing with corpses. Viewer discretion is advised.

MONTEREY, California -- Psychologist Philip Zimbardo has seen good people turn evil, and he thinks he knows why.

Zimbardo will speak Thursday afternoon at the TED conference, where he plans to illustrate his points by showing a three-minute video, obtained by Wired.com, that features many previously unseen photographs from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq (disturbing content).
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/ted_zimbardo
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 02:13 pm
I know there were experiments done at both Stanford and Yale that showed how "regular, intelligent, people" can turn to violence when given the order by a superior. They had to stop the experiments, because it was going too far.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 10:20 am
President Bush; what a guy! Christians, stand up and be counted.


Bush Vetoes Bill That Would Limit Interrogations
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
President Bush announced his veto on a bill that would require intelligence services to abide by the same rules on torture as the military.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 11:19 am
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20080308/lnq080308.gif

Same kooks, different medium.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 01:43 pm
McGentrix wrote:


Same kooks, different medium.


You lack the intellect necessary to seek, and if that were to ever happen, to understand. You are limited to being a slavish follower.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 02:57 pm
Foxfyre on one of the older threads wrote:
On the theory that this thread has effectively run its course, I propose all the GOPers, Conservatives, moderates, fence sitters, and those who find Conservative topics interesting, resume the discussion HERE
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 03:30 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre on one of the older threads wrote:
On the theory that this thread has effectively run its course, I propose all the GOPers, Conservatives, moderates, fence sitters, and those who find Conservative topics interesting, resume the discussion HERE


Walter, I'm sure the anti-Bush folks would have found it without your help.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 03:43 pm
Ticomaya wrote:

Walter, I'm sure the anti-Bush folks would have found it without your help.


Sorry for posting it. I will ask the mods to dlete that response.

Excuse me very much again for that post!
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2008 07:18 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre on one of the older threads wrote:
On the theory that this thread has effectively run its course, I propose all the GOPers, Conservatives, moderates, fence sitters, and those who find Conservative topics interesting, resume the discussion HERE


Walter, I'm sure the anti-Bush folks would have found it without your help.


It isn't remotely possible that there are any other kind of folk, is it?.

Notice how Foxy left out any mention of what's his face.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 06:45 am
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 06:58 am
I thought this was squashed a few years ago.

I hope the Democrats do not bring it up again. Well, maybe I do so we can continue to expose their hypocrisy.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 10:00 am
Good luck trying to drum up interest; so far not too many keep up with the issue. Believe it or not; I kind of lean towards you all's view in that I don't think the government should involved with these things. But then neither do I think the government should get involved with a lot of other things such as Regulation of Obscenity, Indecency and Profanity on entertainment and things like that and people's marriages... or censure the internet news...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 10:47 am
Bush as political philosopher...I've always loved him in this role...

Quote:
"We know who these advocates of so-called balance really have in their sights: shows hosted by people like Rush Limbaugh or James Dobson, or many of you here today. By insisting on so-called balance, they want to silence those they don't agree with. The truth of the matter is, they know they cannot prevail in the public debate of ideas. They don't acknowledge that you are the balance … The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we're strengthened by diversity of opinions."

"If Congress truly supports the free and open exchange of ideas, then there is a way they can demonstrate that right now. Republicans have drafted legislation that would ban reinstatement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine.


There's a good possibility something like the FD might again come up the pike. You chaps will piss about it and repeat the cliches that Bush repeats above rather than go to the trouble of getting yourselves educated. Pity, because you're hurting yourselves, your families and your neighbors.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 10:56 am
blatham wrote:
Bush as political philosopher...I've always loved him in this role...

Quote:
"We know who these advocates of so-called balance really have in their sights: shows hosted by people like Rush Limbaugh or James Dobson, or many of you here today. By insisting on so-called balance, they want to silence those they don't agree with. The truth of the matter is, they know they cannot prevail in the public debate of ideas. They don't acknowledge that you are the balance … The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we're strengthened by diversity of opinions."

"If Congress truly supports the free and open exchange of ideas, then there is a way they can demonstrate that right now. Republicans have drafted legislation that would ban reinstatement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine.


There's a good possibility something like the FD might again come up the pike. You chaps will piss about it and repeat the cliches that Bush repeats above rather than go to the trouble of getting yourselves educated. Pity, because you're hurting yourselves, your families and your neighbors.


How so? You agree with the fairness doctrine? Why?
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:21 am
blatham wrote:
Bush as political philosopher...I've always loved him in this role...

Quote:
"We know who these advocates of so-called balance really have in their sights: shows hosted by people like Rush Limbaugh or James Dobson, or many of you here today. By insisting on so-called balance, they want to silence those they don't agree with. The truth of the matter is, they know they cannot prevail in the public debate of ideas. They don't acknowledge that you are the balance … The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we're strengthened by diversity of opinions."

"If Congress truly supports the free and open exchange of ideas, then there is a way they can demonstrate that right now. Republicans have drafted legislation that would ban reinstatement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine.


There's a good possibility something like the FD might again come up the pike. You chaps will piss about it and repeat the cliches that Bush repeats above rather than go to the trouble of getting yourselves educated. Pity, because you're hurting yourselves, your families and your neighbors.


What part of what Bush said would the "Chaps" "piss about"?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:31 am
Isn't this rich?

That Bush could state such a thing with a straight face.

"The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we're strengthened by diversity of opinions."

The problem for people like this is that they don't want diversity of opinions, they are petrified of having to put forward their ideas in a competing environment. All they want is an audience of dittoheads.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:37 am
JTT wrote: All they want is an audience of dittoheads.


Yup! Those who disagreed with Bush lost their jobs. Look at all the generals that became "yes" men, because they feared for their own skins, and sacrificed the soldiers is such despicable ways such as not providing the proper training or equipment to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. When Bush and this administration kept repeating that when the generals asked for more troops, they will get them was never challenged even though most knew there were no more troops to be had. Look at the results; many are serving multiple duty in war zones that endangers their lives even though the generals know that is not good for the soldiers.

It's disgusting!
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:41 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
JTT wrote: All they want is an audience of dittoheads.


Yup! Those who disagreed with Bush lost their jobs. Look at all the generals that became "yes" men, because they feared for their own skins, and sacrificed the soldiers is such despicable ways such as not providing the proper training or equipment to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. When Bush and this administration kept repeating that when the generals asked for more troops, they will get them was never challenged even though most knew there were no more troops to be had. Look at the results; many are serving multiple duty in war zones that endangers their lives even though the generals know that is not good for the soldiers.

It's disgusting!


What does any of that have to do with the Fairness Doctrine?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:44 am
woiyo wrote: What does any of that have to do with the Fairness Doctrine?


Are you for real? Bush is the most secretive president of modern times, and he talks about "free speech" as if he understands its meaning. Give me a break!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 06:48:15