0
   

Hillery, Obama, Edwards and the Democrates

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 03:48 pm
In the thread on the Republican race, Realjohnboy raised a relevant point about the Iowa caucuses a bit ago:

realjohnboy wrote:
We all know that Iowa's event is not a primary but a caucus. There is a big difference.

As I understand it, the Dems and Repubs will have their respective gatherings and at some point hands will be raised in support of the various candidates.

If I lived in Iowa, my hand would go up for Bill Richardson. [..] But my say doesn't end there. The supporters of the various third tier candidates in both parties would be courted to switch our votes and go for someone else the next time hands are raised.

So when the media reports that Hillary-Obama are virtually tied, as are Romney-Huckabee, they are only looking at the first round.

Is my understanding of the process in Iowa correct?


And I replied:

nimh wrote:
Right. People who in the first round at their district's caucusing support a candidate that gets less than 15% are then asked to switch to another candidate in the next round.

In 2004 this helped Edwards, who got a lot of switch-overs from Kucinich (after having diligently established links with that constituency beforehand). Now, too, Edwards could stand to benefit especially: the Edwards camp was touting a poll this week (or might have been last week) that showed that while Hillary and Obama only had about 20% of second-choice preferences (Obama doing only marginally better than Hillary), Edwards had about 40% [correction: about 30%].

An earlier poll I remember that asked about second choices, a month or two ago, also had Edwards at the top of second choices, but with Obama narrowly trailing - and again, Hillary in last place, at a sizable distance. [..]


OK, so I came upon some more info about second preferences.

Newsweek published a new poll about the Iowa caucuses this weekend. The poll should be approached with ambivalence: it has Huckabee and Obama up much higher than other recent polls, and Romney and Edwards considerably lower than other recent polls.

Moreover, as pollster.com remarks, it identifies a far larger proportion of Iowans as "likely cacus-goers" than other polls, and than the proportion that actually turned out in previous elections.

However, the Newsweek poll is interesting in one respect: it has info on what people's second choices would be.

Here are those numbers for the Democratic race:

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/593/newsweek071207iowademhh1.png
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 04:14 pm
Less than a year before Americans go to the polls to choose the next president and the 111th Congress, Gallup finds the Democrats holding a considerable advantage over the Republicans in public perceptions of which party can handle a variety of national issues.

Overall, the Democratic Party is perceived as better able to handle 6 of 10 issues that are likely to be heavily debated in the 2008 campaigns, and they roughly tie with the Republican Party on another 2. The Republicans lead on illegal immigration and terrorism, but their previously substantial advantage on terrorism has been cut by two-thirds since 2004.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/103102/Democratic-Party-Winning-Issues.aspx
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 08:27 pm
Edwards released a plan to help students pay for college and reduce student debt:

Quote:
The Edwards campaign, which has been in policy overdrive in the past few weeks, released a plan on Tuesday on helping students pay for college and reducing student debt. The plan includes initiatives like creating a "College for Everyone" program that would pay for one year of tuition, fees, and books for 2 million students each year; allowing all students to borrow directly from the Department of Education; eliminating bank subsidies on student loans; stream-lining the application for federal student aid; and helping low-income school districts provide college counseling and prep courses.

Source

From the horse's mouth:

John Edwards 08: Edwards Outlines Plan To Help Students Pay For College And Reduce Student Debt
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 08:30 pm
Barack Obama releases a plan for "universal, voluntary citizen service":

Quote:
Barack Obama came out with his plan for "universal, voluntary citizen service." The plan would fund an additional 250,000 AmeriCorps posts and double the size of the Peace Corps, create service-learning programs at more schools and universities, and create a Craigslist-like online network for volunteer opportunities. The plan, he says, offers an expanded vision of patriotism, service and common purpose.

(Same source as above)

From the horse's mouth:

Barack Obama '08: Helping All Americans Serve Their Country; Barack Obama's Plan For Universal Voluntary Citizen Service
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 08:39 pm
John Edwards releases a plan to address racial disparities in the US:

Quote:
John Edwards, still in policy overdrive, released his "Plan for Opportunity for all Americans" on Friday, to address racial disparities in the United States. The plan integrates some of his previous policy statements on universal health care, ending poverty, making housing more affordable, and improving schools with additional measures to address disparities in the criminal justice system, protect voting rights, and enforce existing civil rights laws.

Source

From the horse's mouth:

John Edwards '08: African-American Leaders Discuss Edwards' "Plan For Opportunity For All Americans"
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 09:19 pm
nimh wrote:
Barack Obama releases a plan for "universal, voluntary citizen service":

Quote:
Barack Obama came out with his plan for "universal, voluntary citizen service." The plan would fund an additional 250,000 AmeriCorps posts and double the size of the Peace Corps, create service-learning programs at more schools and universities, and create a Craigslist-like online network for volunteer opportunities. The plan, he says, offers an expanded vision of patriotism, service and common purpose.

(Same source as above)

From the horse's mouth:

Barack Obama '08: Helping All Americans Serve Their Country; Barack Obama's Plan For Universal Voluntary Citizen Service


Outside of specifics on how to do this right, this is an idea I like a lot.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 9 Dec, 2007 09:28 pm
I posted Obama's speech and some highlights of his Call to Service plan several pages back on the Obama thread but it got lost in the "Hillary, is she a meanie or only labeled as one" debate.


I like Obama's plan a lot.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Mon 10 Dec, 2007 06:11 pm
I couple of points that make sense to me. The die has been cast in the media, and more so by the day, that the Dem nomination is between two candidates...Hill and Obama. This leaves the others further behind and quickly...especially Edwards who aims at Hill all the time which helps Obama's case. And as nimh brought up Obama gets the good press already.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 05:19 pm
Signs of a desperate Hillary camp?



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/13/bill-shaheen-resigns-as-h_n_76715.html



Bill Shaheen, Hillary Clinton's New Hampshire Co-Chair, has announced he will step down from that position. His resignation comes in the wake of remarks he made concerning Clinton rival Barack Obama's past drug use, and his insinuation Obama not only used, but also dealt drugs.

In an email statement Shaheen wrote:

"I would like to reiterate that I deeply regret my comments yesterday . . . . I have made the personal decision that I will step down as the Co-Chair of the Hillary for President campaign . . . . we must all get back to electing the best qualified candidate who has the record of making change happen in this country."

Bill Shaheen is the husband of former New Hampshire governor and 2008 U.S. Senate candidate Jeanne Shaheen.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 05:24 pm
I'm pretty sure they are in anxiety mode. Canning the fellow was the only alternative.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 06:55 pm
While I havent made any type of decision about who I am going to vote for, I am about to shock some of you.

Of all the dems running, Obama is the only one I would consider supporting.
Not because I agree with all of his positions, but because he does have some fresh ideas and he does seem to actually believe what he is saying.

Having read that, I can hear some of you hitting the floor in shock.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 06:58 pm
More like hitting the ceiling in happiness.

:-)

Not because of you, specifically, mysteryman, but I think it's great that a person LIKE you would consider supporting Obama, because that probably means many other people like you probably are doing the same.

All in "who knows" territory for another month or so though... we'll start to find out some things in Iowa...

And thanks for saying so by the way, I'm always curious about what the swingier voters are thinking.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 07:06 pm
sozobe wrote:
More like hitting the ceiling in happiness.

:-)

Not because of you, specifically, mysteryman, but I think it's great that a person LIKE you would consider supporting Obama, because that probably means many other people like you probably are doing the same.

All in "who knows" territory for another month or so though... we'll start to find out some things in Iowa...

And thanks for saying so by the way, I'm always curious about what the swingier voters are thinking.


I have said before that my choice for President was Evan Bayh (D.-IN) but he decided not to run.
In many ways Obama reminds me of him.
There are still far to many voices in the choir for me to say with any certainty who I will support, but on the dem side my choice would be Obama.

That does not mean I have given up on the repub candidates, nor does it mean that I am giving up my conservative values.

It does however mean that I would consider Obama the only dem candidate that I would support.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 07:21 pm
Yeah.
If I vote for a republican, it will be Mike Huckabee.

If I vote for a moose, it will be Bullwinkle.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 08:48 pm
Sources close to the Bullwinkle campaign want to make it very clear that they refuse utterly to dignify any rumors as to Mike Huckabee's purported inappropriate behavior with farm animals in the far distant past when he was young.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 09:08 pm
mysteryman wrote:
That does not mean I have given up on the repub candidates, nor does it mean that I am giving up my conservative values.

It does however mean that I would consider Obama the only dem candidate that I would support.

mysteryman wrote:
Having read that, I can hear some of you hitting the floor in shock.


I'm not surprised at all. Obama appears to be every conservative's favourite Democrat nowadays. :wink:
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 09:11 pm
snood wrote:
Yeah.
If I vote for a republican, it will be Mike Huckabee.

If I vote for a moose, it will be Bullwinkle.

Yeah Smile

Among the Republicans, I'd still opt for McCain, but Huckabee would be my second choice. But yeah, no way on earth I'd be voting Republican anyhow.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 09:38 pm
nimh wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
That does not mean I have given up on the repub candidates, nor does it mean that I am giving up my conservative values.

It does however mean that I would consider Obama the only dem candidate that I would support.

mysteryman wrote:
Having read that, I can hear some of you hitting the floor in shock.


I'm not surprised at all. Obama appears to be every conservative's favourite Democrat nowadays. :wink:


And isn't that interesting? Why would that be so? He's bright and personable, certainly, rather like the early Mr Clinton (or Huckabee). Another factor, I think, is that all three of them don't come across as idealogues or as set-in-their-ways partisans. Of course, perceptions or ideas about them of that sort can increase (through revelation, behavior or effective smear campaigns). Being a long time in the political limelight does the same sort of damage as years of UV rays.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 10:04 pm
Since neither of you guys can vote here why are you so concerned?

The Democrat slate will likely be Clinton and Richardson. If they instead choose either Obama or Edwards they will run the risk of losing the election - something I doubt they will do.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 13 Dec, 2007 10:14 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Since neither of you guys can vote here why are you so concerned?

The Democrat slate will likely be Clinton and Richardson. If they instead choose either Obama or Edwards they will run the risk of losing the election - something I doubt they will do.


Did you ever sit and watch a National Geographic special on the Gombi chimps? Why bother? It's not as if you could have saved Frodo.

That's the "interest" answer.

Did you notice that this administration has made the world a much much worse place?

That's the "self interest" answer.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 10:45:11