1
   

FIRST A2K STRAW POLL White House 2008

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 10:12 am
Dghs48 wrote:
I'm going with Gingrich for now.....he is the only one, in my opinion, in either party, who has some workable ideas about how to get the country back on track.


What track is that?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 10:29 am
I have to hand it to Newt, he is an expert on ghettoes.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 10:38 am
Cross Caligula and the home shopping channel and you get Newt.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 11:25 am
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 11:33 am
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 11:55 am
woiyo wrote:
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.


Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:02 pm
Blatham
You dont understand that its ok if your a godly republican. Its only wrong if your a goodless democrat.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:14 pm
Blatham


Quote:
Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


The fact that he is a degenerate does not make him wrong about bi-lingual education. Millions came from all over the world and succeeded in turning out a better product than we have with it.

Necessity is a better motivator than indulgence
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:36 pm
au1929 wrote:
Blatham


Quote:
Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


The fact that he is a degenerate does not make him wrong about bi-lingual education. Millions came from all over the world and succeeded in turning out a better product than we have with it.

Necessity is a better motivator than indulgence


Gingrich is an amoral and power-thirsting demagogue. He's as bad as american politics gets (he's smarter than McCarthy).

He is not expressing a rational argument here, he is merely counting on a deep vein of racism and xenophobia present in American culture to raise fears and hatred for his own political gain.

Canada, as you may know, is bilingual as a matter of law. I have not met a European who does not speak at least three languages fluently. Vancouver now is close to 50% of Asian descent and all the ATM machines, for example, have Mandarin as well as English while the can of peas you buy is french on one side and english on the other.

The quintessential comment by an American on this English matter was a Congresswoman from the last century who stated, "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me."
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:38 pm
blatham wrote:
woiyo wrote:
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.


Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


Or maybe 700 is the number of mindless post you make.

Bottom line is printing any US document in any number of languages more than 1 (english) is too many and a waste of my tax dollars.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:43 pm
woiyo wrote:
blatham wrote:
woiyo wrote:
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.


Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


Or maybe 700 is the number of mindless post you make.

Bottom line is printing any US document in any number of languages more than 1 (english) is too many and a waste of my tax dollars.


Well, if economic efficiency is your argument, very soon it will be the case that Spanish speakers outnumber English speakers. It follows as night follows day that you will then argue for the economic efficiencies of a single Spanish government document.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 12:44 pm
woiyo wrote:
blatham wrote:
woiyo wrote:
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.


Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


Or maybe 700 is the number of mindless post you make.

Bottom line is printing any US document in any number of languages more than 1 (english) is too many and a waste of my tax dollars.


Um, it doesn't cost any more money to print in a different language than it does English, yo.

The amount that we spend to print ADDITIONAL documents in foreign languages is negligible. And the gains to society are tremendous; do we or don't we want the most accurate results possible on documents filled out by our citizens? On voting?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 01:23 pm
Bernie, I love that line about Jesus. May I have it?

Our government publishing in other languages is often self-serving. For instance, the IRS publishes a number of documents in Spanish, which urge the readers to file returns, and instructs them on how to do this. The IRS feels it is important to get, and keep, these people in the system.

On another matter, I thought for a while that the Republicans had, for perhaps the first time, a moronless field of candidates. After listening to McCain's statements while in Iraq, I changed my mind.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 01:48 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
woiyo wrote:
blatham wrote:
woiyo wrote:
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly show up to vote... The American people believe English should be the official language of the government... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in the ghetto... Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English."


Could not agree any more with this.


Like that "700" figure up there. But it is a good round number and is, by coincidence, the same number of times Newt has told wives suffering cancer that its time for a divorce because he's humping his secretary.


Or maybe 700 is the number of mindless post you make.

Bottom line is printing any US document in any number of languages more than 1 (english) is too many and a waste of my tax dollars.


Um, it doesn't cost any more money to print in a different language than it does English, yo.

The amount that we spend to print ADDITIONAL documents in foreign languages is negligible. And the gains to society are tremendous; do we or don't we want the most accurate results possible on documents filled out by our citizens? On voting?

Cycloptichorn


What I want is an America that's has a specific culture that made us the great nation we are today. That means controlled immigration, common language, common culture.

this "diversity" trend is bullsh!t and an excuse to seperate people into groups rather than bring people together.


That's how we built this nation.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 01:57 pm
You are 100% wrong. The 'we' you discuss was an amalgam of people from many, many different cultures. There was no one group who 'built' this nation.

The strength of America has always been in our open nature, not in closing off and denying. I too believe that we need closed borders, but that has nothing to do with people speaking whatever language they like to speak.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 02:04 pm
blatham wrote:
Canada, as you may know, is bilingual as a matter of law. I have not met a European who does not speak at least three languages fluently. Vancouver now is close to 50% of Asian descent and all the ATM machines, for example, have Mandarin as well as English while the can of peas you buy is french on one side and english on the other.


It is interesting that you mention Vancouver and it's Asian population in your screed againt Gingrich. Vancouver's own Electoral Reform Commission determined that ballots must be printed using western characters.

"It is not certain whether multilingual ballots are permissible under the Charter. It is at least arguable that the Charter's requirement that names be listed alphabetically suggests that names on ballots must employ the Western alphabet. Several speakers at our public meetings
have suggested that multilingual ballots would increase participation of minority groups in political life.

I think, however, the advantages of multilingual ballots are outweighed by the problems that might be associated with them.

Given that only citizens of Canada have a right to vote, it can be expected that the overwhelming majority of voters, immigrants and otherwise, will have acquired facility with the English language."


http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/erc/pdf/verc_report.pdf (page 122)

So yes, they can be multilingual - as long as that other language uses the western character set. I wonder how much that helps that Asian polulation in Vancouver?

It is also interesting to note that in a footnote on the bottom of that same page they mention "Section 5(1)(d) of the federal Citizenship Act requires that the citizenship applicant possess an adequate knowledge of one of the official languages of Canada. The associated Regulations say that the applicant should be able to comprehend basic spoken statements and questions in past, present and future tenses."

How dare Gingrich suggest that the U.S. have a similar requirement! And shame on those Canadians for being so racist and xenophobic!
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 02:26 pm
The diversity movement is BS. It divides people, and even celebrates their differences. The USA got great because it was a melting pot, which included a common language and, in general, common goals and interests.

When you look around the world where there are distinctly different languages you often find strife. In Quebec, language issues have to some degree separated the province from the rest of Canada, and has been costly. There have been problems, and some riots, in Belgium between those who want to speak French and those who prefer Dutch. There are many other places with similar problems.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Apr, 2007 03:04 pm
And don't forget Italy. And Spain. And Luxembourg. And Switzerland. If they had only started to mandate one language, one culture and one nation under...

Anyways. They could be so successful. Instead, they choose multiculturalism.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 07:36 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You are 100% wrong. The 'we' you discuss was an amalgam of people from many, many different cultures. There was no one group who 'built' this nation.

The strength of America has always been in our open nature, not in closing off and denying. I too believe that we need closed borders, but that has nothing to do with people speaking whatever language they like to speak.

Cycloptichorn


Wrong AGAIN.

This nation was built by people who came here TO BE AN AMERICAN. They WANTED to blend into our culture and speak out language.

Except for MY forefathers (who had their land taken from them), every single one of your ancestors came from somewhere else to BE AN AMERICAN.

Many, and ALL the illegals, are coming here to be in America. There is a big difference (which apparently you can not grasp).
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 08:01 am
woiyo wrote:
This nation was built by people who came here TO BE AN AMERICAN. They WANTED to blend into our culture and speak out language.


Really? But what about, let's say, the Amish? Did they want to be Americans? Did they want to blend into the culture? Did they want to speak English? And today, would you say they are less American than you are, woiyo? What about the Italians? Many American cities which have a distinctly Italian quarter. Did the Italians really want to be Americans? Did they want to blend into the culture, and want to speak English? Or what about the famous Chinatown parts of so many cities. You see nothing but Chinese street signs, shop signs... even the subway signs are Chinese. Would you say these people wanted to be Americans, blend into the culture and speak English? If your answer would be no, would you say that they are less American than you are?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 06:20:41