4
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread IV

 
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Jun, 2007 03:05 pm
mysteryman wrote:
maporsche wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Whats funny is that the people crowing about how low Bush's poll numbers are going seem to be ignoring the fact that congress as a whole,and Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi individually,all have lower poll numbers then Bush.


Congress always has low poll numbers, falling from 30% to 20% is not quite as impressive as falling from 70% to 30%. Sure, 20% is lower than 30%, but it's a 50% drop compared to a 10% drop.

And besides, the country elects the President, individual Congress members only have to answer to their own districts. There is nothing I personally can do about Reid or Pelosi, but I do have a voice in voting for the President.


What's funny is that you keep trolling this out.


Whats even funnier is that you cant read.

This is the first time I have mentioned it at all.


Not sure why you're saying that I can't read, but I apologize for stating that it was "you" that kept trolling this out. It has come up several times though.
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Jun, 2007 03:18 pm
Do check your numbers, mystery. Actually Pelosi is rated higher than Bush. And if you go beyond the first question and look at the analysis, Congress' low numbers are due to their not getting us out of Bush's lost war in Iraq. That's why they were elected. Unfortunately they don't have a bulletproof majority, so Bush can still thwart the will of the people. But as Reid said, the vote that Bush vetoed was just the first vote of many. It took a couple years of chipping away at it to finally get us out of Vietnam. The anger is greater this time, so the chipping away is gonna go a lot quicker. Republicans are scared spitless of what's gonna happen when the military has to report on "progress" in Iraqw in July and August. And there is none. You might also look at approval ratings for parties. Repubs are mired around 40%. Dems are in the low 50s. People who consider themselves Repubs have dropped from the high 30s to the low 30s. Doesn't look good for the right.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Jun, 2007 10:40 pm
From the White House (you must read it to understand our president):


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030604-3.html
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 12:43 am
The "Leader of the free world", who should not be in charge of a corner store.

No, correction, perhaps that would be better, then he wouldn't last four weeks.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jun, 2007 09:21 am
Veep Cheney also believes he's above the laws of our land.These are examples of how this administration continues to destroy the laws that protects America from our own government.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 01:40 am
DUBYA! Rah!

DUBYA! Rah!

DUBYA DUBYA DUBYA! Rah Rah Rah!


Where have all the Dubyas gone
Long time passing
Where have all the Dubyas gone
Long time ago.....
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 12:06 pm
This is the sort of thing that Bush supporters are actually supporting.

http://harpers.org/subjects/NoComment

Quote:


The Siegelman prosecution was commenced as the result of a plan hatched between senior figures in the Alabama Republican Party and Karl Rove. This connection is not coincidental, because Rove was once fired by the first President Bush and then had to rehabilitate himself. Rove did this in spades, and the place where he worked his political magic was in Alabama. He put together a campaign to engineer the Alabama GOP's capture of the state's judicial machinery. It worked brilliantly. And Rove has retained tight connections with the Alabama GOP ever since. Rove and the Alabama GOP leaders set out to destroy Siegelman's political career and thus smooth the path by which the Republican Party could secure and retain political control of the Alabama statehouse. It was crafted in such a way as to retard the ability of Democrats to raise money from campaign donors so that they might contest office in Alabama. Each of these purposes is "corrupt." Key to this plan was the use of the machinery of the Department of Justice for its completion - involving the U.S. attorneys offices in Birmingham and Montgomery, and the Department of Justice in Washington. Rove was in a position to make this work and he did so.

The curtain was pulled back on this plan when Dana Jill Simpson, a Republican lawyer who previously worked on a campaign against Siegelman, decided to blow the whistle. Her affidavit described William Canary, a legendary figure in the Alabama GOP, bragging that "his girls" would take care of Siegelman. Canary's wife is Leura Canary, the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama. Alice Martin, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama is a close confidante of Canary's. He referred repeatedly to "Karl," assuring that "Karl" had worked things out with the Justice Department in Washington to assure a criminal investigation and prosecution of Siegelman. Canary is a close friend of Karl Rove, and I have documented their long relationship in another post.

The response to Simpson's affidavit has been a series of brusque dismissive statements - all of them unsworn - from others who figured in the discussion and the federal prosecutor in the Siegelman case, who has now made a series of demonstrably false statements concerning the matter. She's been smeared as "crazy" and as a "disgruntled contract bidder." And something nastier: after her intention to speak became known, Simpson's house was burned to the ground, and her car was driven off the road and totaled. Clearly, there are some very powerful people in Alabama who feel threatened. Her case starts to sound like a chapter out of John Grisham's book The Pelican Brief. However, those who have dismissed Simpson are in for a very rude surprise. Her affidavit stands up on every point, and there is substantial evidence which will corroborate its details.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 12:25 pm
This is the sort of thing that Bush supporters are supporting.

Quote:
GELLMAN: It's been often speculated that 9/11 exerted a profound psychological change on the Vice President. But we did not find evidence that that's true.

There's a moment in the story in which we've got witnesses who are watching him watch the World Trade Center collapse. Everyone else in the room is groaning. And he doesn't blink his eyes. He turns around and starts working the phones again.

And what he's doing is he's finding that 9/11 confirms some long-held beliefs of his. And it gives him the opportunity to press through some long-desired changes. He has not changed his views very much over the years. What has changed is he has a greater opportunity to put them into action.


The '9/11 changed everything' line is bullshit. It didn't change anything. All it did was give an opportunity to those who already had ideas about how American freedoms were to expansive, the ability to actively work to change our system.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2007 01:36 am
From Australia:


In September 2000, when asked what he meant by "leadership", this is what the future president of the United States said:
A leadership is someone who brings people together.
And they still voted for the drongo!
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2007 01:49 am
I'm beginning to feel sorry for GWB.

Everyone is turning on him. Crying or Very sad :wink:

But I will never

never never never

ever feel sorry for Dick Cheney.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2007 05:19 am
McTag wrote:
I'm beginning to feel sorry for GWB.

Everyone is turning on him. Crying or Very sad :wink:

But I will never

never never never

ever feel sorry for Dick Cheney.


Perhaps the reason is Bush gives the impression of being dumb, weak and manipulated into a position he has never fully understood. Not so Cheney. He's the evil manipulator.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 04:31 am
Well surprise, surprise. Libby's crony helps him out.

This from the ex-Governor of Texas who refused to excercise his prerogative of leniency in the execution of dozens, because he had "no alternative under the Law".
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 07:12 am
The conservatives want Libby pardoned. Their argument is if Sandy Burger can sneak classified documents out of the National Archives and not do jail time than Libby shouldn't as well.

If this is going to be the standard than any high ranking government official may commit a crime and not be punished. All one has to do is say there is precedent.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 10:20 am
And "precedence" has the support of Chief Justice Roberts. At least, that's what he said during his interview with congress.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 01:51 pm
xingu wrote:
The conservatives want Libby pardoned. Their argument is if Sandy Burger can sneak classified documents out of the National Archives and not do jail time than Libby shouldn't as well.

If this is going to be the standard than any high ranking government official may commit a crime and not be punished. All one has to do is say there is precedent.


The conspiracy theory is that Bush didn't 'pardon' Libby because if he did then he could no longer plead the 5th and would be forced to give complete sworn testamony with no fear of self-incrimination. By simply commuting this sentence, the appeals process still has to contine and Libby has 5th amendment rights.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 02:41 pm
And rich conservative donors will pay all the expenses.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 03:19 pm
McTag wrote:
Well surprise, surprise. Libby's crony helps him out.

This from the ex-Governor of Texas who refused to excercise his prerogative of leniency in the execution of dozens, because he had "no alternative under the Law".


You need to learn about Texas law.

A prisoner on death row in Texas can only appeal to the office of the governor 1 time.
That is not one time to each governor,but 1 time, period.

If a governor denies clemency,then no subsequent governor can grant clemency.

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/vlibrary/outlines/deathpenprint.html

Here is an interesting fact about the death Penalty...
Quote:
Texas holds the record for the largest number of executions since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Virginia has executed a larger percentage of its population than any other state over 1 million in population.


http://www.religioustolerance.org/execut3.htm
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2007 06:37 am
Scholars urge Bush to ban use of torture

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- President Bush was presented with a letter Monday signed by 50 high school seniors in the Presidential Scholars program urging a halt to "violations of the human rights" of terror suspects held by the United States.

The White House said Bush had not expected the letter but took a moment to read it and talk with a young woman who handed it to him.

"The president enjoyed a visit with the students, accepted the letter and upon reading it let the student know that the United States does not torture and that we value human rights," deputy press secretary Dana Perino said.

The students had been invited to the East Room to hear the president speak about his effort to win congressional reauthorization of his education law known as No Child Left Behind.

The handwritten letter said the students "believe we have a responsibility to voice our convictions."

"We do not want America to represent torture. We urge you to do all in your power to stop violations of the human rights of detainees, to cease illegal renditions, and to apply the Geneva Convention to all detainees, including those designated enemy combatants," the letter said.

The designation as a Presidential Scholar is one of the nation's highest honors for graduating high school students. Each year the program selects one male and one female student from each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Americans living abroad, 15 at-large students, and up to 20 students in the arts on the basis of outstanding scholarship, service, leadership and creativity.

"I know all of you worked hard to reach this day," Bush told the students in his education speech. "Your families are proud of your effort, and we welcome your family members here. Your teachers are proud of your effort, and we welcome your teachers. And our entire nation is proud to call you Presidential Scholar."

The scholars travel to Washington each June for seminars, lectures and workshops with government officials, elected representatives and others.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2007 08:10 am
This is rich. Not Marc Rich, but still rich.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2007 08:37 am


If it was wrong for Clinton to do it (plenty Republicans said it was) is it right for Bush?

And Clinton's was about personal donations. The Libby case was about more important issues than that.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/21/2024 at 08:07:30