mysteryman wrote:maporsche wrote:mysteryman wrote:Whats funny is that the people crowing about how low Bush's poll numbers are going seem to be ignoring the fact that congress as a whole,and Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi individually,all have lower poll numbers then Bush.
Congress always has low poll numbers, falling from 30% to 20% is not quite as impressive as falling from 70% to 30%. Sure, 20% is lower than 30%, but it's a 50% drop compared to a 10% drop.
And besides, the country elects the President, individual Congress members only have to answer to their own districts. There is nothing I personally can do about Reid or Pelosi, but I do have a voice in voting for the President.
What's funny is that you keep trolling this out.
Whats even funnier is that you cant read.
This is the first time I have mentioned it at all.
Not sure why you're saying that I can't read, but I apologize for stating that it was "you" that kept trolling this out. It has come up several times though.
Do check your numbers, mystery. Actually Pelosi is rated higher than Bush. And if you go beyond the first question and look at the analysis, Congress' low numbers are due to their not getting us out of Bush's lost war in Iraq. That's why they were elected. Unfortunately they don't have a bulletproof majority, so Bush can still thwart the will of the people. But as Reid said, the vote that Bush vetoed was just the first vote of many. It took a couple years of chipping away at it to finally get us out of Vietnam. The anger is greater this time, so the chipping away is gonna go a lot quicker. Republicans are scared spitless of what's gonna happen when the military has to report on "progress" in Iraqw in July and August. And there is none. You might also look at approval ratings for parties. Repubs are mired around 40%. Dems are in the low 50s. People who consider themselves Repubs have dropped from the high 30s to the low 30s. Doesn't look good for the right.
The "Leader of the free world", who should not be in charge of a corner store.
No, correction, perhaps that would be better, then he wouldn't last four weeks.
Veep Cheney also believes he's above the laws of our land.These are examples of how this administration continues to destroy the laws that protects America from our own government.
DUBYA! Rah!
DUBYA! Rah!
DUBYA DUBYA DUBYA! Rah Rah Rah!
Where have all the Dubyas gone
Long time passing
Where have all the Dubyas gone
Long time ago.....
This is the sort of thing that Bush supporters are actually supporting.
http://harpers.org/subjects/NoComment
Quote:
The Siegelman prosecution was commenced as the result of a plan hatched between senior figures in the Alabama Republican Party and Karl Rove. This connection is not coincidental, because Rove was once fired by the first President Bush and then had to rehabilitate himself. Rove did this in spades, and the place where he worked his political magic was in Alabama. He put together a campaign to engineer the Alabama GOP's capture of the state's judicial machinery. It worked brilliantly. And Rove has retained tight connections with the Alabama GOP ever since. Rove and the Alabama GOP leaders set out to destroy Siegelman's political career and thus smooth the path by which the Republican Party could secure and retain political control of the Alabama statehouse. It was crafted in such a way as to retard the ability of Democrats to raise money from campaign donors so that they might contest office in Alabama. Each of these purposes is "corrupt." Key to this plan was the use of the machinery of the Department of Justice for its completion - involving the U.S. attorneys offices in Birmingham and Montgomery, and the Department of Justice in Washington. Rove was in a position to make this work and he did so.
The curtain was pulled back on this plan when Dana Jill Simpson, a Republican lawyer who previously worked on a campaign against Siegelman, decided to blow the whistle. Her affidavit described William Canary, a legendary figure in the Alabama GOP, bragging that "his girls" would take care of Siegelman. Canary's wife is Leura Canary, the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama. Alice Martin, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama is a close confidante of Canary's. He referred repeatedly to "Karl," assuring that "Karl" had worked things out with the Justice Department in Washington to assure a criminal investigation and prosecution of Siegelman. Canary is a close friend of Karl Rove, and I have documented their long relationship in another post.
The response to Simpson's affidavit has been a series of brusque dismissive statements - all of them unsworn - from others who figured in the discussion and the federal prosecutor in the Siegelman case, who has now made a series of demonstrably false statements concerning the matter. She's been smeared as "crazy" and as a "disgruntled contract bidder." And something nastier: after her intention to speak became known, Simpson's house was burned to the ground, and her car was driven off the road and totaled. Clearly, there are some very powerful people in Alabama who feel threatened. Her case starts to sound like a chapter out of John Grisham's book The Pelican Brief. However, those who have dismissed Simpson are in for a very rude surprise. Her affidavit stands up on every point, and there is substantial evidence which will corroborate its details.
Cycloptichorn
This is the sort of thing that Bush supporters are supporting.
Quote:GELLMAN: It's been often speculated that 9/11 exerted a profound psychological change on the Vice President. But we did not find evidence that that's true.
There's a moment in the story in which we've got witnesses who are watching him watch the World Trade Center collapse. Everyone else in the room is groaning. And he doesn't blink his eyes. He turns around and starts working the phones again.
And what he's doing is he's finding that 9/11 confirms some long-held beliefs of his. And it gives him the opportunity to press through some long-desired changes. He has not changed his views very much over the years. What has changed is he has a greater opportunity to put them into action.
The '9/11 changed everything' line is bullshit. It didn't change anything. All it did was give an opportunity to those who already had ideas about how American freedoms were to expansive, the ability to actively work to change our system.
Cycloptichorn
From Australia:
In September 2000, when asked what he meant by "leadership", this is what the future president of the United States said:
A leadership is someone who brings people together.
And they still voted for the drongo!
I'm beginning to feel sorry for GWB.
Everyone is turning on him.
:wink:
But I will never
never never never
ever feel sorry for Dick Cheney.
McTag wrote:I'm beginning to feel sorry for GWB.
Everyone is turning on him.
:wink:
But I will never
never never never
ever feel sorry for Dick Cheney.
Perhaps the reason is Bush gives the impression of being dumb, weak and manipulated into a position he has never fully understood. Not so Cheney. He's the evil manipulator.
Well surprise, surprise. Libby's crony helps him out.
This from the ex-Governor of Texas who refused to excercise his prerogative of leniency in the execution of dozens, because he had "no alternative under the Law".
The conservatives want Libby pardoned. Their argument is if Sandy Burger can sneak classified documents out of the National Archives and not do jail time than Libby shouldn't as well.
If this is going to be the standard than any high ranking government official may commit a crime and not be punished. All one has to do is say there is precedent.
And "precedence" has the support of Chief Justice Roberts. At least, that's what he said during his interview with congress.
xingu wrote:The conservatives want Libby pardoned. Their argument is if Sandy Burger can sneak classified documents out of the National Archives and not do jail time than Libby shouldn't as well.
If this is going to be the standard than any high ranking government official may commit a crime and not be punished. All one has to do is say there is precedent.
The conspiracy theory is that Bush didn't 'pardon' Libby because if he did then he could no longer plead the 5th and would be forced to give complete sworn testamony with no fear of self-incrimination. By simply commuting this sentence, the appeals process still has to contine and Libby has 5th amendment rights.
And rich conservative donors will pay all the expenses.
McTag wrote:Well surprise, surprise. Libby's crony helps him out.
This from the ex-Governor of Texas who refused to excercise his prerogative of leniency in the execution of dozens, because he had "no alternative under the Law".
You need to learn about Texas law.
A prisoner on death row in Texas can only appeal to the office of the governor 1 time.
That is not one time to each governor,but 1 time, period.
If a governor denies clemency,then no subsequent governor can grant clemency.
http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/vlibrary/outlines/deathpenprint.html
Here is an interesting fact about the death Penalty...
Quote:Texas holds the record for the largest number of executions since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Virginia has executed a larger percentage of its population than any other state over 1 million in population.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/execut3.htm
If it was wrong for Clinton to do it (plenty Republicans said it was) is it right for Bush?
And Clinton's was about personal donations. The Libby case was about more important issues than that.