Advocate wrote:Foxy, what bugs me about you, and a lot of other conservatives, is that you continue to assert pro-conservative arguments that have been totally discredited. For instance, you continue to assert that Bush had valid intelligence supporting the invasion of Iraq. You also continue to assert that Plame was not covert. There is, as you know full well, massive evidence to the contrary. It seems that you and your fellow rightwingers have no regard for your credibility.
And it bugs us conservatives just as much for anti-Bush people to keep asserting that he lied or intentionally misrepresented the evidence, etc. etc. etc. when we have presented HUGE amounts of data disputing that.
I think you have not discredited the evidence used in the decision to invade Iraq in the least. And whether it bugs you or not, I'll keep saying what I believe to be true about that.
Whether certain intelligence was valid is certainly a subject worthy of being debated. But so many liberals don't want to debate that. They want to discredit Bush and they aren't about to evaluate whether the accusations against him are credible, accurate, or reasonable. And they aren't willing to acknowledge how many people thought the evidence was credible at the time decisions were made.
And even the special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame case has stated she was not covert at the time we was outed and frankly it only makes people who say she was look uninformed or to be deliberately misrepresenting the facts there. But it sure doesn't stop them from going right ahead and condemning Bush for 'outing' a covert CIA agent even though a CIA employee now admits being the one who did it.
Every single one of us on the conservative side have acknowledged valid reasons to criticize our President. But we also are able to see facts for what they are and are not willing to be silent when those facts are intentionally or ignorantly mistated, misrepresented, and/or facts are manufactured to falsely accuse him.
