ican711nm wrote:Ramafuchs wrote:Ican
with high respect and due regard may i humbly request you to wait for a while ( few days) to pour forth my views about this barbaric unprovoked criminal iraq war?
Await please.
Quote not Encyclo Brit.( mine is 1996).
Irrespective of our intellectual inadequacies let us uphold the rare product which is called TRUTH.
If I understand you correctly, you are requesting that I not respond to any of your posts about the USA invasion of Iraq until you complete your argument that the USA invasion of Iraq was a "barbaric unprovoked criminal" act. And you make this request in the name of upholding "the rare product which is called TRUTH."
I'm intrigued by the uniqueness of your request. I shall comply with
your request until whichever comes first: Saturday; or you post you have completed pouring forth your views on this topic. At either time I shall repeat my last post and expect a truthful relevant response to it from you.
OK, Ramafuchs! Now it's time for you to respond to my post:
___________________________________________________________________________
From Encyclopedia Britannica Books of the Year, as of December 31, 2002, Total Iraq Violent Deaths since January 1, 1979 = 1,229,210.
From IBC
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/ as of December 31, 2007, Total Iraq Violent Deaths since January 1, 2003 = 88,585.
___________________________________________________________________________
Daily Average, Iraq Violent Deaths, PRE and POST January 1, 2003:
PRE = 1/1/1979 - 12/31/2002 = 1,229,210/8,766 days = 140 per day;
POST = 1/1/2003 - 12/31/2007 = 88,585/1,826 days = 49 per day;
PRE / POST = 140/49 = 2.9.
___________________________________________________________________________
If the IBC numbers were half the actual true numbers then:
PRE = 1/1/1979 - 12/31/2002 = 1,229,210/8,766 days = 140 per day;
POST = 1/1/2003 - 12/31/2007 = 177,170/1,826 days = 97 per day;
PRE / POST = 140/97 = 1.4
.___________________________________________________________________________