revel wrote:Let me just ask you this, Ican; if in three or four years there has not been any significant improvement in either fxing Iraq or getting all the so called al-Qaeda in Iraq; would you then decide that perhaps western nations are not meant to fix or occupy (in all but name) middle east nations?
NO! I would not decide western nations were not
"meant" to fix or occurpy middle east nations--not even if the elapsed time were 30 to 40 years.
However, in your hypothetical 3 to 4 year period, I probably would decide western nations were not ABLE to fix or occurpy middle east nations!
I think that a majority in the West will probably soon prematurely decide we aren't ABLE. As a consequence of that decision we will quickly become unable.
--------------------------
The standard criticism by most of the anti-war crowd is that Bush and Maliki are incompetent. Their evidence is our current failure to succeed in Iraq after more than 4 years of trying. That implies to me that they think competent replacements of these two leaders exist and could succeed in Iraq. I wish they would make that explicit.