9
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, ELEVENTH THREAD

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 08:41 pm
ican, You're the one who doesn't understand anything. We have dummy Bush as president, and he doesn't listen to any advice. You probably didn't notice all these years, but some people can grasp these things after a year or two - it's been five years.

Bush supports Maliki; that's the only support Maliki has in the whole wide world. He can't do anything in Iraq for the Iraqi people. The Iraqi government is nonfunctional. Do you understand what "nonfunctional" means?

The civil war in Iraq is country-wide. It's not an isolated city/county problem; it's a national problem. No national government, no national agreements. It's real simple logic, but people like you have your head up your arse. Try to breathe some fresh air sometime; you need it.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 12:36 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican, You're the one who doesn't understand anything. We have dummy Bush as president, and he doesn't listen to any advice. You probably didn't notice all these years, but some people can grasp these things after a year or two - it's been five years.

Please pay attention and try hard to understand.

I have at least a half-dozen times in this thread agreed that Bush and his administration are incompetent. However, their incompetence does not relieve us of our responsibility to our progeny and to each other to solve the Iraq problem Bush et al have thus far failed to solve.


Bush supports Maliki; that's the only support Maliki has in the whole wide world. He can't do anything in Iraq for the Iraqi people. The Iraqi government is nonfunctional. Do you understand what "nonfunctional" means?

Please pay attention and try hard to understand.

YES, the Maliki government is also incompetent (e.g., "non-functional"). However, their incompetence does not relieve us of our responsibility to our progeny and to each other to solve the problem the Maliki government has thus far failed to solve.


The civil war in Iraq is country-wide. It's not an isolated city/county problem; it's a national problem. No national government, no national agreements. It's real simple logic, but people like you have your head up your arse. Try to breathe some fresh air sometime; you need it.

Please pay attention and try hard to understand.

YES, the civil war (as well as the al-Qaeda war) in Iraq is countrywide and is a national problem. However, none of these facts relieve us of our responsibility to our progeny and to each other to solve the problem we have has thus far failed to solve.



I sure hope that I have finally cleared all that up for you.

The debatable issues are:

(A) Is it true that we have a responsibility to our progeny and to each other to solve the Iraq problem we have thus far failed to solve?

(B) Can the problem be solved?

(C) How can the problem be solved?

(D) What are the consequences of not solving the problem?

(E) Are the consequences of not trying to solve the problem worse or better than the consequences of trying to solve the problem?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 05:05 pm
Let me just ask you this, Ican; if in three or four years there has not been any significant improvement in either fxing Iraq or getting all the so called al-Qaeda in Iraq; would you then decide that perhaps western nations are not meant to fix or occupy (in all but name) middle east nations?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 05:07 pm
Iraqi power grid nearing collapse
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 05:56 pm
revel wrote:
Let me just ask you this, Ican; if in three or four years there has not been any significant improvement in either fxing Iraq or getting all the so called al-Qaeda in Iraq; would you then decide that perhaps western nations are not meant to fix or occupy (in all but name) middle east nations?

NO! I would not decide western nations were not "meant" to fix or occurpy middle east nations--not even if the elapsed time were 30 to 40 years.

However, in your hypothetical 3 to 4 year period, I probably would decide western nations were not ABLE to fix or occurpy middle east nations!

I think that a majority in the West will probably soon prematurely decide we aren't ABLE. As a consequence of that decision we will quickly become unable.

--------------------------

The standard criticism by most of the anti-war crowd is that Bush and Maliki are incompetent. Their evidence is our current failure to succeed in Iraq after more than 4 years of trying. That implies to me that they think competent replacements of these two leaders exist and could succeed in Iraq. I wish they would make that explicit.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 06:48 pm
ican, You're hot paying attention; Bush's incompetence and mismanagement in Iraq brought Iraq to a point that no outside solution is possible. He ignored all the expert advise from day one until about two weeks ago - and finally "talked" to Syria and Iran. Too little, too late.

There is no military or political expert who thinks that the Iraqi government can accomplish anything. That said, any more military sacrifice by the US is only to sacrifice more of our men and women to a lost cause.

Only Bush, some GOP members of congress, and Petraeus are the only ones talking about "progress." Don't you ever wonder why? We've been having "progress" for the last five years, and it's gotten unbearable for the Iraqis. Over 25 percent of children are starving. Don't they count at all?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 07:08 pm
ican, I do not believe you even understand what's going on in Iraq.

Iraqi power grid nearing collapse


By STEVEN R. HURST, Associated Press Writer
29 minutes ago



BAGHDAD - Iraq's power grid is on the brink of collapse because of insurgent sabotage, rising demand, fuel shortages and provinces that are unplugging local power stations from the national grid, officials said Saturday.

What do you think our military or the Iraqi government can do to turn this around?
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 07:18 pm
ican wrote :

Quote:
Quote:
revel wrote:
Let me just ask you this, Ican; if in three or four years there has not been any significant improvement in either fxing Iraq or getting all the so called al-Qaeda in Iraq; would you then decide that perhaps western nations are not meant to fix or occupy (in all but name) middle east nations?


NO! I would not decide western nations were not "meant" to fix or occurpy middle east nations--not even if the elapsed time were 30 to 40 years.


so are we to understand that "western nations are meant to fix and occupy the middle eastern nations" ?

perhaps my knowledge of the english language is insufficient to properly understand ican .

i won't go any further into this until i understand what ican truly meant .
hbg
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 01:51 pm
hamburger wrote:
ican wrote :

Quote:
Quote:
revel wrote:
Let me just ask you this, Ican; if in three or four years there has not been any significant improvement in either fxing Iraq or getting all the so called al-Qaeda in Iraq; would you then decide that perhaps western nations are not meant to fix or occupy (in all but name) middle east nations?


NO! I would not decide western nations were not "meant" to fix or occurpy middle east nations--not even if the elapsed time were 30 to 40 years.


so are we to understand that "western nations are meant to fix and occupy the middle eastern nations" ?

perhaps my knowledge of the english language is insufficient to properly understand ican .

i won't go any further into this until i understand what ican truly meant .
hbg

I'm unsure what revel meant by the phrase: 'perhaps western nations were not "meant" to fix or occurpy middle east nations.' I just assumed she meant "not fated" (i.e., not "decreed, controlled, or marked by fate") to solve the problem.

My point was: just because a problem has not been solved after a very long time, does not mean it is not meant or not fated to ever be solved. On the other hand, I think because a problem has not been solved after a very long time, probably those trying to solve it are unable to solve it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:08 pm
ican, Try to learn a little bit about reality concepts. The US represents only five percent of the world's population. We can't illegal attack all countries that do not have a democracy to force democracy on them. You see, it's a simple matter of logic called logistics.

We don't have the manpower or the treasure to force our will on the rest of the world. Most people already hate us for our occupation of Iraq.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:11 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican, I do not believe you even understand what's going on in Iraq.

Iraqi power grid nearing collapse


By STEVEN R. HURST, Associated Press Writer
29 minutes ago



BAGHDAD - Iraq's power grid is on the brink of collapse because of insurgent sabotage, rising demand, fuel shortages and provinces that are unplugging local power stations from the national grid, officials said Saturday.

What do you think our military or the Iraqi government can do to turn this around?

The US can temporarily reduce the current load on the Iraq power grid; build more power stations; stop sabotage by stopping saboteurs; stop saboteurs by doing a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure; do a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure by delegating that job to a more competent Iraq government; get a more competent Iraq government by refusing to do the current Iraq government's job for them.

Meanwhile our military should continue capturing or exterminating al-Qaeda.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:17 pm
ican wrote :

Quote:
My point was: just because a problem has not been solved after a very long time, does not mean it is not meant or not fated to ever be solved. On the other hand, I think because a problem has not been solved after a very long time, probably those trying to solve it are unable to solve it.


now that sounds MUCH better to me !
diplomacy , patience , persuasion - and other NON violent means - could probably be given a chance . of course those things usually are much more time consuming - they often don't provide the "quick fix" , but perhaps they might work in the end and leave much less resentment (even perhaps result in gratitude ?) .
hbg
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:21 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican, Try to learn a little bit about reality concepts. The US represents only five percent of the world's population. We can't illegal attack all countries that do not have a democracy to force democracy on them. You see, it's a simple matter of logic called logistics.

We don't have the manpower or the treasure to force our will on the rest of the world. [Maybe] Most people already hate us for our occupation of Iraq.

I agree! I agree! I agree! I agree! I agree! I agree! ...
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:31 pm
are we in some agreement after all Razz Laughing Question
let's make sure we don't become TOO conformist !!!
we need someone to lob some arguments into this sedate crowd now and then !
hbg
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:34 pm
ican711nm wrote:

The US can temporarily reduce the current load on the Iraq power grid; build more power stations; stop sabotage by stopping saboteurs; stop saboteurs by doing a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure; do a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure by delegating that job to a more competent Iraq government; get a more competent Iraq government by refusing to do the current Iraq government's job for them.

Meanwhile our military should continue capturing or exterminating al-Qaeda.


Do you really expect any of those things to happen?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:37 pm
hamburger wrote:
are we in some agreement after all Razz Laughing Question
let's make sure we don't become TOO conformist !!!
we need someone to lob some arguments into this sedate crowd now and then !
hbg

Smile Never fear as long as ican is here.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 02:42 pm
realjohnboy wrote:
ican711nm wrote:

The US can temporarily reduce the current load on the Iraq power grid; build more power stations; stop sabotage by stopping saboteurs; stop saboteurs by doing a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure; do a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure by delegating that job to a more competent Iraq government; get a more competent Iraq government by refusing to do the current Iraq government's job for them.

Meanwhile our military should continue capturing or exterminating al-Qaeda.


Do you really expect any of those things to happen?

No! Not with the current US leadership in office. Competent US leadership would make it happen. I hope we will not be too late in 2008. Sigh
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 09:57 am
Another good reason why our soldiers need to leave Iraq ASAP. Not only is Bush incompetent, but the generals running this show are endangering our soldiers lives unnecessarily.



190,000 weapons 'missing in Iraq'

AK-47 assault rifles might have ended up in insurgents' hands
The US military cannot account for 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to the Iraqi security forces, an official US report says.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) says the Pentagon cannot track about 30% of the weapons distributed in Iraq over the past three years.


It was bad enough we didn't secure the weapons after major combat operations were over, but to continue this stupid irresponsibility to increase danger for our soldiers and the Iraqis is unforgivable.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 10:03 am
c.i. wrote :

Quote:
190,000 weapons 'missing in Iraq'


remember the weapons given by the U.S. to the taleban in afghanastin to fight the soviets ?
many are still still being used by the taleban to fight U.S. , afghan and other forces .
hbg
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 10:13 am
realjohnboy wrote:
ican711nm wrote:

The US can temporarily reduce the current load on the Iraq power grid; build more power stations; stop sabotage by stopping saboteurs; stop saboteurs by doing a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure; do a better job protecting Iraq infrastructure by delegating that job to a more competent Iraq government; get a more competent Iraq government by refusing to do the current Iraq government's job for them.

Meanwhile our military should continue capturing or exterminating al-Qaeda.


Do you really expect any of those things to happen?


Of course, all you have to do is click your heels and repeat:

"I do believe, I do believe, I do believe, I do..."

Ican has even drunk the Al-Qaeda kool-aid as if Al-Qaeda is the major obstacle in Iraq. The fact is that there is no military solution in Iraq and the prospects of some kind of political solution are bleak at best.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 07:35:45