Butrflynet wrote:This might be a silly question, but aren't most maps duplicates of each other with a little embellishment and added specialized detail here and there?
dyslexia wrote:"It appears that at least two maps that came out of the Carter book were or are very closely similar, or unusually similar, to maps that were produced and published in Dennis Ross' book 'The Missing Peace,' " Stein said.
That book, published in 2004, is also about the search for peace in the Middle East. "This could be incredibly coincidental, or it could not," Stein said. "But it goes to the way history books should be written, and the way citations should be made when material is borrowed."
butrflynet's question is not a silly one. indeed, since everyone seems to have agreed on the size and shape of the world in geographic terms, maps will be generally similar with the differences mentioned etc.
in terms of copyright, it either is or it is not
the same map(s).
also, there could be another factor relevant before spanking jimmy...
if the ross maps were created while working for the government or the clinton administration and copyrighted as a "work for hire", then the ross would not necessarily own the work. so, if say, bill clinton owned the copyrights, he could allow carter to use the work, and if so inclined, without credits.
bottom line is that ross will need, as was said in another post, to produce the certified copy of his copyright to pursue this. of course, he'll have one for the entire book, but from what the previous post said, i think it does sound like a commissioned work as far as the maps go.
in which there are some cases where a company(or whoever) will declare that anything produced while you are in they're employ is automatically considered the property of the employer.
most likely, though, the guy is just making a fuss to bolster a sagging book performance....