Ut Oh, Could Nancy Be Facing....

dlowan wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Oh, i see, well, since you seem to be expert at what TOS rules are....
I got nasty right back, right back, back being the operative word. I explained that I will meet anybody half way but if someone wants to throw mud, I can accomodate.

I have seen you do little BUT throw mud.

This thread is possibly the most degenerate of your efforts...since, as even you appear to acknowledge, accusing someone of supporting paedophilia is an extremely serious accusation, and one which ought to be made only with real evidence.

You, however, have shown yourself happy to promulgate the worst of vapid, lying slime.

Madam, people who live in **** houses ought not to be accusing others of throwing mud until they have scrubbed their own dwelling.

The stuff you post, as with a number (fortunately few) of other posters here, degrades the entire process of political discourse.

I know you dredge slime publications for your material, and do not create it yourself, but you promulgate it more widely than it would otherwise reach, and so you are an active agent in the harm.

None that wasn't deserved, & speaking of **** houses, yours has never been cleaned, little boy.

And so begins another day in oblivion for LoneStarMadam...

kickycan wrote:

And so begins another day in oblivion for LoneStarMadam...

Aww, what a shame, you didn't choke on your little kernals.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

dlowan wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Oh, i see, well, since you seem to be expert at what TOS rules are....
I got nasty right back, right back, back being the operative word. I explained that I will meet anybody half way but if someone wants to throw mud, I can accomodate.

I have seen you do little BUT throw mud.

This thread is possibly the most degenerate of your efforts...since, as even you appear to acknowledge, accusing someone of supporting paedophilia is an extremely serious accusation, and one which ought to be made only with real evidence.

You, however, have shown yourself happy to promulgate the worst of vapid, lying slime.

Madam, people who live in **** houses ought not to be accusing others of throwing mud until they have scrubbed their own dwelling.

The stuff you post, as with a number (fortunately few) of other posters here, degrades the entire process of political discourse.

I know you dredge slime publications for your material, and do not create it yourself, but you promulgate it more widely than it would otherwise reach, and so you are an active agent in the harm.

None that wasn't deserved, & speaking of **** houses, yours has never been cleaned, little boy.

So...you stand by your claim re Pelosi and nambla?


Evidence.

Now.

mysteryman said that George W. "Bush has won every election he has run in, both at the state and federal level."

what level is congress?

dlowan wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

dlowan wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Oh, i see, well, since you seem to be expert at what TOS rules are....
I got nasty right back, right back, back being the operative word. I explained that I will meet anybody half way but if someone wants to throw mud, I can accomodate.

I have seen you do little BUT throw mud.

This thread is possibly the most degenerate of your efforts...since, as even you appear to acknowledge, accusing someone of supporting paedophilia is an extremely serious accusation, and one which ought to be made only with real evidence.

You, however, have shown yourself happy to promulgate the worst of vapid, lying slime.

Madam, people who live in **** houses ought not to be accusing others of throwing mud until they have scrubbed their own dwelling.

The stuff you post, as with a number (fortunately few) of other posters here, degrades the entire process of political discourse.

I know you dredge slime publications for your material, and do not create it yourself, but you promulgate it more widely than it would otherwise reach, and so you are an active agent in the harm.

None that wasn't deserved, & speaking of **** houses, yours has never been cleaned, little boy.

So...you stand by your claim re Pelosi and nambla?


Evidence.

Now.

Of course I do, she has never bad mouthed them like she did Foley, she never bad mpouthed Gary Studds ([/I]Studds, what an appropriate name for a dIm liberal child molestor heehee) she marched in the parade with ol harry, damn near holding his hand. She isn't bashful about sending other child molesrors to hell, why does she protect NAMBLA by keeping her mouth shut.?

You'd know better KK had you been born rather than pooped out on a fence post.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

You'd know better KK had you been born rather than pooped out on a fence post.

I can't quite remember which chapter of scripture the "Oh yeah you were pooped out on a fence post" rejoinder comes from. LSM as a decent Christian woman can you enlighten us on that point?

LSm is actually an 8 year old....apparently.

candidone1 wrote:

LSm is actually an 8 year old....apparently.

Just right for you, huh

LoneStarMadam wrote:

candidone1 wrote:

LSm is actually an 8 year old....apparently.

Just right for you, huh

Apparently my hypothesis was correct.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

candidone1 wrote:

LSm is actually an 8 year old....apparently.

Just right for you, huh

Apparently my hypothesis was correct.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

You'd know better KK had you been born rather than pooped out on a fence post.

I can't quite remember which chapter of scripture the "Oh yeah you were pooped out on a fence post" rejoinder comes from. LSM as a decent Christian woman can you enlighten us on that point?

candidone1 wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

candidone1 wrote:

LSm is actually an 8 year old....apparently.

Just right for you, huh

Apparently my hypothesis was correct.

Possibly.

Or, her greatest joy seems to be in accusing people of paedophilia.


I suspect she just tried to slime you.